Cargando…
Efficacy of Olopatadine versus Epinastine for Treating Allergic Conjunctivitis Caused by Japanese Cedar Pollen: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of olopatadine versus epinastine in healthy Japanese adults with a history of allergic conjunctivitis to Japanese cedar pollen. METHODS: This Phase IV double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial comprised three cl...
Autores principales: | Fukushima, Atsuki, Ebihara, Nobuyuki |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209092/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25269854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-014-0156-2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Efficacy of 0.05% epinastine and 0.1% olopatadine for allergic conjunctivitis as seasonal and preseasonal treatment
por: Mizoguchi, Takanori, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Topical Olopatadine Hydrochloride versus Ketotifen Fumarate for Allergic Conjunctivitis
por: Patel, Dharmistha, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Treatment of allergic conjunctivitis with olopatadine hydrochloride eye drops
por: Uchio, Eiichi
Publicado: (2008) -
Efficacy of Proactive Topical Antihistamine Use in Patients with Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis
por: Fukushima, Atsuki, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Effect of Japanese Cedar Pollen Sublingual Immunotherapy on Asthma Patients with Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Caused by Japanese Cedar Pollen
por: Ueda, Shoko, et al.
Publicado: (2022)