Cargando…

Patient reported outcome measures for cardiac ablation procedures: a multicentre pilot to develop a new questionnaire

AIM: To assess the feasibility of administering Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) in patients treated with ablation for cardiac arrhythmias, and to conduct the first stage of development and testing of a new PROM tool. METHODS AND RESULTS: A new tool was developed by a multidisciplinary tea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Withers, Kathleen L., White, Judith, Carolan-Rees, Grace, Patrick, Hannah, O'Callaghan, Peter, Murray, Stephen, Cunningham, David, Wood, Kathryn A., Lencioni, Mauro, Griffith, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24627541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu032
_version_ 1782341227312578560
author Withers, Kathleen L.
White, Judith
Carolan-Rees, Grace
Patrick, Hannah
O'Callaghan, Peter
Murray, Stephen
Cunningham, David
Wood, Kathryn A.
Lencioni, Mauro
Griffith, Michael
author_facet Withers, Kathleen L.
White, Judith
Carolan-Rees, Grace
Patrick, Hannah
O'Callaghan, Peter
Murray, Stephen
Cunningham, David
Wood, Kathryn A.
Lencioni, Mauro
Griffith, Michael
author_sort Withers, Kathleen L.
collection PubMed
description AIM: To assess the feasibility of administering Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) in patients treated with ablation for cardiac arrhythmias, and to conduct the first stage of development and testing of a new PROM tool. METHODS AND RESULTS: A new tool was developed by a multidisciplinary team and tested alongside an adaptation of the patient perception of arrhythmia questionnaire (PPAQ) and EQ-5D-5L in a multicentre retrospective audit involving 791 consecutive cardiac arrhythmia patients treated with catheter ablation at three UK centres over 13 months. Data were recorded in the National Cardiac Rhythm Management Database, part of the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. The response rate was 71.9% (n = 569). Patients reported significant improvements across all outcomes and impacts, with reductions in symptoms of 51.7% (heart racing), 33.9% (fatigue) 31.8% (heart flutters), 43.5% (dizziness), 38.6% (breathlessness), 44.2% (chest pressure), 33.1% (trouble concentrating), 15.9% (headache), 28.3% (neck pressure), and 23.4% (fainting) (P < 0.001). The mean number of social days affected reduced by 7.49 days/month (P < 0.001); mean work/school days affected/month reduced by 6.26 (P < 0.001); mean GP/hospital visits reduced by 1.36 days/month (P < 0.001). The procedure met patient expectations in 72% of responders. CONCLUSIONS: The high response rate suggests that the use of PROMs in this patient group is feasible, with rates equalling those of the National PROMs Programme. The results showed that patients experienced significant improvements in their quality of life following ablation, while feedback allowed the tools to be improved. Further work is required to validate these tools; however, the findings suggest that PROMs could be useful in the audit of ablation techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4209127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42091272014-10-28 Patient reported outcome measures for cardiac ablation procedures: a multicentre pilot to develop a new questionnaire Withers, Kathleen L. White, Judith Carolan-Rees, Grace Patrick, Hannah O'Callaghan, Peter Murray, Stephen Cunningham, David Wood, Kathryn A. Lencioni, Mauro Griffith, Michael Europace Clinical Research AIM: To assess the feasibility of administering Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) in patients treated with ablation for cardiac arrhythmias, and to conduct the first stage of development and testing of a new PROM tool. METHODS AND RESULTS: A new tool was developed by a multidisciplinary team and tested alongside an adaptation of the patient perception of arrhythmia questionnaire (PPAQ) and EQ-5D-5L in a multicentre retrospective audit involving 791 consecutive cardiac arrhythmia patients treated with catheter ablation at three UK centres over 13 months. Data were recorded in the National Cardiac Rhythm Management Database, part of the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. The response rate was 71.9% (n = 569). Patients reported significant improvements across all outcomes and impacts, with reductions in symptoms of 51.7% (heart racing), 33.9% (fatigue) 31.8% (heart flutters), 43.5% (dizziness), 38.6% (breathlessness), 44.2% (chest pressure), 33.1% (trouble concentrating), 15.9% (headache), 28.3% (neck pressure), and 23.4% (fainting) (P < 0.001). The mean number of social days affected reduced by 7.49 days/month (P < 0.001); mean work/school days affected/month reduced by 6.26 (P < 0.001); mean GP/hospital visits reduced by 1.36 days/month (P < 0.001). The procedure met patient expectations in 72% of responders. CONCLUSIONS: The high response rate suggests that the use of PROMs in this patient group is feasible, with rates equalling those of the National PROMs Programme. The results showed that patients experienced significant improvements in their quality of life following ablation, while feedback allowed the tools to be improved. Further work is required to validate these tools; however, the findings suggest that PROMs could be useful in the audit of ablation techniques. Oxford University Press 2014-11 2014-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4209127/ /pubmed/24627541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu032 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Withers, Kathleen L.
White, Judith
Carolan-Rees, Grace
Patrick, Hannah
O'Callaghan, Peter
Murray, Stephen
Cunningham, David
Wood, Kathryn A.
Lencioni, Mauro
Griffith, Michael
Patient reported outcome measures for cardiac ablation procedures: a multicentre pilot to develop a new questionnaire
title Patient reported outcome measures for cardiac ablation procedures: a multicentre pilot to develop a new questionnaire
title_full Patient reported outcome measures for cardiac ablation procedures: a multicentre pilot to develop a new questionnaire
title_fullStr Patient reported outcome measures for cardiac ablation procedures: a multicentre pilot to develop a new questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Patient reported outcome measures for cardiac ablation procedures: a multicentre pilot to develop a new questionnaire
title_short Patient reported outcome measures for cardiac ablation procedures: a multicentre pilot to develop a new questionnaire
title_sort patient reported outcome measures for cardiac ablation procedures: a multicentre pilot to develop a new questionnaire
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24627541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euu032
work_keys_str_mv AT witherskathleenl patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcardiacablationproceduresamulticentrepilottodevelopanewquestionnaire
AT whitejudith patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcardiacablationproceduresamulticentrepilottodevelopanewquestionnaire
AT carolanreesgrace patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcardiacablationproceduresamulticentrepilottodevelopanewquestionnaire
AT patrickhannah patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcardiacablationproceduresamulticentrepilottodevelopanewquestionnaire
AT ocallaghanpeter patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcardiacablationproceduresamulticentrepilottodevelopanewquestionnaire
AT murraystephen patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcardiacablationproceduresamulticentrepilottodevelopanewquestionnaire
AT cunninghamdavid patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcardiacablationproceduresamulticentrepilottodevelopanewquestionnaire
AT woodkathryna patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcardiacablationproceduresamulticentrepilottodevelopanewquestionnaire
AT lencionimauro patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcardiacablationproceduresamulticentrepilottodevelopanewquestionnaire
AT griffithmichael patientreportedoutcomemeasuresforcardiacablationproceduresamulticentrepilottodevelopanewquestionnaire