Cargando…
Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators
BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of the duration of exclusive breastfeeding is complicated by factors related to definitions, timing, duration of recall, methods of analysis, and sample biases. Clearly prospective methods are likely to be more accurate but are too expensive to use in most large-scal...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25349624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-9-18 |
_version_ | 1782341231364276224 |
---|---|
author | Greiner, Ted |
author_facet | Greiner, Ted |
author_sort | Greiner, Ted |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of the duration of exclusive breastfeeding is complicated by factors related to definitions, timing, duration of recall, methods of analysis, and sample biases. Clearly prospective methods are likely to be more accurate but are too expensive to use in most large-scale surveys. Internationally, most surveys use a point-in-time or current status measurement (usually 24-hour recall) and report their findings using an indicator established by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 1991 that involves combining all babies less than six months old in order to obtain a large enough sample size to result in stable proportions that can be compared over time. However, this indicator is complex to understand and explain and is widely misunderstood, even within the breastfeeding community. It is commonly cited in ways that greatly exaggerate how common exclusive breastfeeding actually is. DISCUSSION: A life-long or since birth indicator, introduced in 2000, counts infants as no longer exclusively breastfed as soon as anything else is fed to them. This is appropriate to do if for example data are being used to link infant feeding patterns with vertical transmission of HIV or later patterns of infant allergy. However, this indicator underestimates the total extent of exclusive breastfeeding, since some women interrupt but then resume it after a period of supplementation (which could for example only be a small amount of water given a single time). SUMMARY: Exactly which indicator is best to use depends on the purpose for which the data are being used. However, for surveys, the best approach, rarely used, would be to report indicators based on both point-in-time and life-long data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4209171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42091712014-10-28 Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators Greiner, Ted Int Breastfeed J Debate BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of the duration of exclusive breastfeeding is complicated by factors related to definitions, timing, duration of recall, methods of analysis, and sample biases. Clearly prospective methods are likely to be more accurate but are too expensive to use in most large-scale surveys. Internationally, most surveys use a point-in-time or current status measurement (usually 24-hour recall) and report their findings using an indicator established by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 1991 that involves combining all babies less than six months old in order to obtain a large enough sample size to result in stable proportions that can be compared over time. However, this indicator is complex to understand and explain and is widely misunderstood, even within the breastfeeding community. It is commonly cited in ways that greatly exaggerate how common exclusive breastfeeding actually is. DISCUSSION: A life-long or since birth indicator, introduced in 2000, counts infants as no longer exclusively breastfed as soon as anything else is fed to them. This is appropriate to do if for example data are being used to link infant feeding patterns with vertical transmission of HIV or later patterns of infant allergy. However, this indicator underestimates the total extent of exclusive breastfeeding, since some women interrupt but then resume it after a period of supplementation (which could for example only be a small amount of water given a single time). SUMMARY: Exactly which indicator is best to use depends on the purpose for which the data are being used. However, for surveys, the best approach, rarely used, would be to report indicators based on both point-in-time and life-long data. BioMed Central 2014-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4209171/ /pubmed/25349624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-9-18 Text en Copyright © 2014 Greiner; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Debate Greiner, Ted Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators |
title | Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators |
title_full | Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators |
title_fullStr | Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators |
title_full_unstemmed | Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators |
title_short | Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators |
title_sort | exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25349624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4358-9-18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greinerted exclusivebreastfeedingmeasurementandindicators |