Cargando…

Quantification of right ventricular volume in dogs: a comparative study between three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with the reference method magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) volume and function are important diagnostic and prognostic factors in dogs with primary or secondary right-sided heart failure. The complex shape of the right ventricle and its retrosternal position make the quantification of its volume difficult. For that reason,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sieslack, Anne K, Dziallas, Peter, Nolte, Ingo, Wefstaedt, Patrick, Hungerbühler, Stephan O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25306140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-014-0242-3
_version_ 1782341233713086464
author Sieslack, Anne K
Dziallas, Peter
Nolte, Ingo
Wefstaedt, Patrick
Hungerbühler, Stephan O
author_facet Sieslack, Anne K
Dziallas, Peter
Nolte, Ingo
Wefstaedt, Patrick
Hungerbühler, Stephan O
author_sort Sieslack, Anne K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) volume and function are important diagnostic and prognostic factors in dogs with primary or secondary right-sided heart failure. The complex shape of the right ventricle and its retrosternal position make the quantification of its volume difficult. For that reason, only few studies exist, which deal with the determination of RV volume parameters. In human medicine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is considered to be the reference technique for RV volumetric measurement (Nat Rev Cardiol 7(10):551-563, 2010), but cardiac computed tomography (CCT) and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) are other non-invasive methods feasible for RV volume quantification. The purpose of this study was the comparison of 3DE and CCT with CMRI, the gold standard for RV volumetric quantification. RESULTS: 3DE showed significant lower and CCT significant higher right ventricular volumes than CMRI. Both techniques showed very good correlations (R > 0.8) with CMRI for the volumetric parameters end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV). Ejection fraction (EF) and stroke volume (SV) were not different when considering CCT and CMRI, whereas 3DE showed a significant higher EF and lower SV than CMRI. The 3DE values showed excellent intra-observer variability (<3%) and still acceptable inter-observer variability (<13%). CONCLUSION: CCT provides an accurate image quality of the right ventricle with comparable results to the reference method CMRI. CCT overestimates the RV volumes; therefore, it is not an interchangeable method, having the disadvantage as well of needing general anaesthesia. 3DE underestimated the RV-Volumes, which could be explained by the worse image resolution. The excellent correlation between the methods indicates a close relationship between 3DE and CMRI although not directly comparable. 3DE is a promising technique for RV volumetric quantification, but further studies in awake dogs and dogs with heart disease are necessary to evaluate its usefulness in veterinary cardiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4209227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42092272014-10-28 Quantification of right ventricular volume in dogs: a comparative study between three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with the reference method magnetic resonance imaging Sieslack, Anne K Dziallas, Peter Nolte, Ingo Wefstaedt, Patrick Hungerbühler, Stephan O BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) volume and function are important diagnostic and prognostic factors in dogs with primary or secondary right-sided heart failure. The complex shape of the right ventricle and its retrosternal position make the quantification of its volume difficult. For that reason, only few studies exist, which deal with the determination of RV volume parameters. In human medicine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is considered to be the reference technique for RV volumetric measurement (Nat Rev Cardiol 7(10):551-563, 2010), but cardiac computed tomography (CCT) and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) are other non-invasive methods feasible for RV volume quantification. The purpose of this study was the comparison of 3DE and CCT with CMRI, the gold standard for RV volumetric quantification. RESULTS: 3DE showed significant lower and CCT significant higher right ventricular volumes than CMRI. Both techniques showed very good correlations (R > 0.8) with CMRI for the volumetric parameters end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV). Ejection fraction (EF) and stroke volume (SV) were not different when considering CCT and CMRI, whereas 3DE showed a significant higher EF and lower SV than CMRI. The 3DE values showed excellent intra-observer variability (<3%) and still acceptable inter-observer variability (<13%). CONCLUSION: CCT provides an accurate image quality of the right ventricle with comparable results to the reference method CMRI. CCT overestimates the RV volumes; therefore, it is not an interchangeable method, having the disadvantage as well of needing general anaesthesia. 3DE underestimated the RV-Volumes, which could be explained by the worse image resolution. The excellent correlation between the methods indicates a close relationship between 3DE and CMRI although not directly comparable. 3DE is a promising technique for RV volumetric quantification, but further studies in awake dogs and dogs with heart disease are necessary to evaluate its usefulness in veterinary cardiology. BioMed Central 2014-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4209227/ /pubmed/25306140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-014-0242-3 Text en © Sieslack et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sieslack, Anne K
Dziallas, Peter
Nolte, Ingo
Wefstaedt, Patrick
Hungerbühler, Stephan O
Quantification of right ventricular volume in dogs: a comparative study between three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with the reference method magnetic resonance imaging
title Quantification of right ventricular volume in dogs: a comparative study between three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with the reference method magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Quantification of right ventricular volume in dogs: a comparative study between three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with the reference method magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Quantification of right ventricular volume in dogs: a comparative study between three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with the reference method magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of right ventricular volume in dogs: a comparative study between three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with the reference method magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Quantification of right ventricular volume in dogs: a comparative study between three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with the reference method magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort quantification of right ventricular volume in dogs: a comparative study between three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with the reference method magnetic resonance imaging
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25306140
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-014-0242-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sieslackannek quantificationofrightventricularvolumeindogsacomparativestudybetweenthreedimensionalechocardiographyandcomputedtomographywiththereferencemethodmagneticresonanceimaging
AT dziallaspeter quantificationofrightventricularvolumeindogsacomparativestudybetweenthreedimensionalechocardiographyandcomputedtomographywiththereferencemethodmagneticresonanceimaging
AT nolteingo quantificationofrightventricularvolumeindogsacomparativestudybetweenthreedimensionalechocardiographyandcomputedtomographywiththereferencemethodmagneticresonanceimaging
AT wefstaedtpatrick quantificationofrightventricularvolumeindogsacomparativestudybetweenthreedimensionalechocardiographyandcomputedtomographywiththereferencemethodmagneticresonanceimaging
AT hungerbuhlerstephano quantificationofrightventricularvolumeindogsacomparativestudybetweenthreedimensionalechocardiographyandcomputedtomographywiththereferencemethodmagneticresonanceimaging