Cargando…

Using clinical variables and drug prescription data to control for confounding in outcome comparisons between hospitals

BACKGROUND: Hospital discharge records are an essential source of information when comparing health outcomes among hospitals; however, they contain limited information on acute clinical conditions. Doubts remain as to whether the addition of clinical and drug consumption information would improve th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colais, Paola, Di Martino, Mirko, Fusco, Danilo, Davoli, Marina, Aylin, Paul, Perucci, Carlo Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25339263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0495-3
_version_ 1782341234870714368
author Colais, Paola
Di Martino, Mirko
Fusco, Danilo
Davoli, Marina
Aylin, Paul
Perucci, Carlo Alberto
author_facet Colais, Paola
Di Martino, Mirko
Fusco, Danilo
Davoli, Marina
Aylin, Paul
Perucci, Carlo Alberto
author_sort Colais, Paola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospital discharge records are an essential source of information when comparing health outcomes among hospitals; however, they contain limited information on acute clinical conditions. Doubts remain as to whether the addition of clinical and drug consumption information would improve the prediction of health outcomes and reduce confounding in inter-hospital comparisons. The objective of the study is to compare the performance of two multivariate risk adjustment models, with and without clinical data and drug prescription information, in terms of their capability to a) predict short-term outcome rates and b) compare hospitals’ risk-adjusted outcome rates using two risk-adjustment procedures. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study based on hospital data collected at the regional level. Two cohorts of patients discharged in 2010 from hospitals located in the Lazio Region, Italy: acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and hip fracture (HF). Multivariate logistic regression models were implemented to predict 30-day mortality (AMI) or 48-hour surgery (HF), adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbidities plus clinical data and drug prescription information. Risk-adjusted outcome rates were derived at the hospital level. RESULTS: The addition of clinical data and drug prescription information improved the capability of the models to predict the study outcomes for the two conditions investigated. The discriminatory power of the AMI model increases when the clinical data and drug prescription information are included (c-statistic increases from 0.761 to 0.797); for the HF model the increase was more slight (c-statistic increases from 0.555 to 0.574). Some differences were observed between the hospital-adjusted proportion estimated using the two different models. However, the estimated hospital outcome rates were weakly affected by the introduction of clinical data and drug prescription information. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the available clinical variables and drug prescription information were important complements to the hospital discharge data for characterising the acute severity of the patients. However, when these variables were used for adjustment purposes their contribution was negligible. This conclusion might not apply at other locations, in other time periods and for other health conditions if there is heterogeneity in the clinical conditions between hospitals. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0495-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4209232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42092322014-11-06 Using clinical variables and drug prescription data to control for confounding in outcome comparisons between hospitals Colais, Paola Di Martino, Mirko Fusco, Danilo Davoli, Marina Aylin, Paul Perucci, Carlo Alberto BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Hospital discharge records are an essential source of information when comparing health outcomes among hospitals; however, they contain limited information on acute clinical conditions. Doubts remain as to whether the addition of clinical and drug consumption information would improve the prediction of health outcomes and reduce confounding in inter-hospital comparisons. The objective of the study is to compare the performance of two multivariate risk adjustment models, with and without clinical data and drug prescription information, in terms of their capability to a) predict short-term outcome rates and b) compare hospitals’ risk-adjusted outcome rates using two risk-adjustment procedures. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study based on hospital data collected at the regional level. Two cohorts of patients discharged in 2010 from hospitals located in the Lazio Region, Italy: acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and hip fracture (HF). Multivariate logistic regression models were implemented to predict 30-day mortality (AMI) or 48-hour surgery (HF), adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbidities plus clinical data and drug prescription information. Risk-adjusted outcome rates were derived at the hospital level. RESULTS: The addition of clinical data and drug prescription information improved the capability of the models to predict the study outcomes for the two conditions investigated. The discriminatory power of the AMI model increases when the clinical data and drug prescription information are included (c-statistic increases from 0.761 to 0.797); for the HF model the increase was more slight (c-statistic increases from 0.555 to 0.574). Some differences were observed between the hospital-adjusted proportion estimated using the two different models. However, the estimated hospital outcome rates were weakly affected by the introduction of clinical data and drug prescription information. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the available clinical variables and drug prescription information were important complements to the hospital discharge data for characterising the acute severity of the patients. However, when these variables were used for adjustment purposes their contribution was negligible. This conclusion might not apply at other locations, in other time periods and for other health conditions if there is heterogeneity in the clinical conditions between hospitals. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0495-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4209232/ /pubmed/25339263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0495-3 Text en © Colais et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Colais, Paola
Di Martino, Mirko
Fusco, Danilo
Davoli, Marina
Aylin, Paul
Perucci, Carlo Alberto
Using clinical variables and drug prescription data to control for confounding in outcome comparisons between hospitals
title Using clinical variables and drug prescription data to control for confounding in outcome comparisons between hospitals
title_full Using clinical variables and drug prescription data to control for confounding in outcome comparisons between hospitals
title_fullStr Using clinical variables and drug prescription data to control for confounding in outcome comparisons between hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Using clinical variables and drug prescription data to control for confounding in outcome comparisons between hospitals
title_short Using clinical variables and drug prescription data to control for confounding in outcome comparisons between hospitals
title_sort using clinical variables and drug prescription data to control for confounding in outcome comparisons between hospitals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25339263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0495-3
work_keys_str_mv AT colaispaola usingclinicalvariablesanddrugprescriptiondatatocontrolforconfoundinginoutcomecomparisonsbetweenhospitals
AT dimartinomirko usingclinicalvariablesanddrugprescriptiondatatocontrolforconfoundinginoutcomecomparisonsbetweenhospitals
AT fuscodanilo usingclinicalvariablesanddrugprescriptiondatatocontrolforconfoundinginoutcomecomparisonsbetweenhospitals
AT davolimarina usingclinicalvariablesanddrugprescriptiondatatocontrolforconfoundinginoutcomecomparisonsbetweenhospitals
AT aylinpaul usingclinicalvariablesanddrugprescriptiondatatocontrolforconfoundinginoutcomecomparisonsbetweenhospitals
AT peruccicarloalberto usingclinicalvariablesanddrugprescriptiondatatocontrolforconfoundinginoutcomecomparisonsbetweenhospitals