Cargando…

Stated Choice design comparison in a developing country: recall and attribute nonattendance

BACKGROUND: Experimental designs constitute a vital component of all Stated Choice (aka discrete choice experiment) studies. However, there exists limited empirical evaluation of the statistical benefits of Stated Choice (SC) experimental designs that employ non-zero prior estimates in constructing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iles, Richard A, Rose, John M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-014-0025-3
_version_ 1782341256928559104
author Iles, Richard A
Rose, John M
author_facet Iles, Richard A
Rose, John M
author_sort Iles, Richard A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Experimental designs constitute a vital component of all Stated Choice (aka discrete choice experiment) studies. However, there exists limited empirical evaluation of the statistical benefits of Stated Choice (SC) experimental designs that employ non-zero prior estimates in constructing non-orthogonal constrained designs. This paper statistically compares the performance of contrasting SC experimental designs. In so doing, the effect of respondent literacy on patterns of Attribute non-Attendance (ANA) across fractional factorial orthogonal and efficient designs is also evaluated. The study uses a ‘real’ SC design to model consumer choice of primary health care providers in rural north India. A total of 623 respondents were sampled across four villages in Uttar Pradesh, India. METHODS: Comparison of orthogonal and efficient SC experimental designs is based on several measures. Appropriate comparison of each design’s respective efficiency measure is made using D-error results. Standardised Akaike Information Criteria are compared between designs and across recall periods. Comparisons control for stated and inferred ANA. Coefficient and standard error estimates are also compared. RESULTS: The added complexity of the efficient SC design, theorised elsewhere, is reflected in higher estimated amounts of ANA among illiterate respondents. However, controlling for ANA using stated and inferred methods consistently shows that the efficient design performs statistically better. Modelling SC data from the orthogonal and efficient design shows that model-fit of the efficient design outperform the orthogonal design when using a 14-day recall period. The performance of the orthogonal design, with respect to standardised AIC model-fit, is better when longer recall periods of 30-days, 6-months and 12-months are used. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of the efficient design’s cognitive demand is apparent among literate and illiterate respondents, although, more pronounced among illiterate respondents. This study empirically confirms that relaxing the orthogonality constraint of SC experimental designs increases the information collected in choice tasks, subject to the accuracy of the non-zero priors in the design and the correct specification of a ‘real’ SC recall period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4209457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42094572014-11-10 Stated Choice design comparison in a developing country: recall and attribute nonattendance Iles, Richard A Rose, John M Health Econ Rev Research BACKGROUND: Experimental designs constitute a vital component of all Stated Choice (aka discrete choice experiment) studies. However, there exists limited empirical evaluation of the statistical benefits of Stated Choice (SC) experimental designs that employ non-zero prior estimates in constructing non-orthogonal constrained designs. This paper statistically compares the performance of contrasting SC experimental designs. In so doing, the effect of respondent literacy on patterns of Attribute non-Attendance (ANA) across fractional factorial orthogonal and efficient designs is also evaluated. The study uses a ‘real’ SC design to model consumer choice of primary health care providers in rural north India. A total of 623 respondents were sampled across four villages in Uttar Pradesh, India. METHODS: Comparison of orthogonal and efficient SC experimental designs is based on several measures. Appropriate comparison of each design’s respective efficiency measure is made using D-error results. Standardised Akaike Information Criteria are compared between designs and across recall periods. Comparisons control for stated and inferred ANA. Coefficient and standard error estimates are also compared. RESULTS: The added complexity of the efficient SC design, theorised elsewhere, is reflected in higher estimated amounts of ANA among illiterate respondents. However, controlling for ANA using stated and inferred methods consistently shows that the efficient design performs statistically better. Modelling SC data from the orthogonal and efficient design shows that model-fit of the efficient design outperform the orthogonal design when using a 14-day recall period. The performance of the orthogonal design, with respect to standardised AIC model-fit, is better when longer recall periods of 30-days, 6-months and 12-months are used. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of the efficient design’s cognitive demand is apparent among literate and illiterate respondents, although, more pronounced among illiterate respondents. This study empirically confirms that relaxing the orthogonality constraint of SC experimental designs increases the information collected in choice tasks, subject to the accuracy of the non-zero priors in the design and the correct specification of a ‘real’ SC recall period. Springer 2014-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4209457/ /pubmed/25386388 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-014-0025-3 Text en Copyright © 2014 Iles and Rose; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Iles, Richard A
Rose, John M
Stated Choice design comparison in a developing country: recall and attribute nonattendance
title Stated Choice design comparison in a developing country: recall and attribute nonattendance
title_full Stated Choice design comparison in a developing country: recall and attribute nonattendance
title_fullStr Stated Choice design comparison in a developing country: recall and attribute nonattendance
title_full_unstemmed Stated Choice design comparison in a developing country: recall and attribute nonattendance
title_short Stated Choice design comparison in a developing country: recall and attribute nonattendance
title_sort stated choice design comparison in a developing country: recall and attribute nonattendance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386388
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13561-014-0025-3
work_keys_str_mv AT ilesricharda statedchoicedesigncomparisoninadevelopingcountryrecallandattributenonattendance
AT rosejohnm statedchoicedesigncomparisoninadevelopingcountryrecallandattributenonattendance