Cargando…

The Use of Megaprostheses for Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects in the Extremities: A Critical Review

In the case of primary malignant tumors, extensive metastatic disease, major trauma or end-stage revision arthroplasty, the orthopaedic surgeon often has to deal with the need to reconstruct large skeletal defects, or replace bone of low quality. In the past years this was frequently impossible, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gkavardina, Anthippi, Tsagozis, Panagiotis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352933
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001408010384
_version_ 1782341259524833280
author Gkavardina, Anthippi
Tsagozis, Panagiotis
author_facet Gkavardina, Anthippi
Tsagozis, Panagiotis
author_sort Gkavardina, Anthippi
collection PubMed
description In the case of primary malignant tumors, extensive metastatic disease, major trauma or end-stage revision arthroplasty, the orthopaedic surgeon often has to deal with the need to reconstruct large skeletal defects, or replace bone of low quality. In the past years this was frequently impossible, and the only solution was amputation of the extremity. Later, the introduction of custom-made endoprostheses capable of reconstructing large skeletal defects, also known as megaprostheses, allowed for sparing of the extremity. This was especially valuable in the case of oncologic orthopaedic surgery, as advances in the medical treatment of sarcoma patients improved prognosis and limb-preserving surgery proved to have comparable patient survival rates to amputation. However, custom-made designs were implicated in frequent mechanical failures. Furthermore, they were extremely difficult to revise. The introduction of modular endoprostheses in the 1980s marked a new era in orthopaedic oncologic surgery. Modular megaprostheses consist of a number of different components in readily available sets, which can be assembled in various combinations to best address the specific bone defect. Moreover, they proved to have considerably lower rate of mechanical failures, which were also much easier to address during revision surgery by replacing only the parts that failed. The functional outcome after reconstruction with megasprostheses is often very satisfactory and the patient can enjoy a good quality of life. Nowadays, the major challenge is to eliminate the rate of non-mechanical complications associated with surgery of that magnitude, namely the risk for wound dehiscence and necrosis, deep infection, as well as local recurrence of the tumor. In our present mini-review, we attempt to make a critical approach of the available literature, focusing on the multiple aspects of reconstructive surgery using megaprostheses. We present the evolution of megasprosthetic implants, the indications for their use, and describe the outcome of surgery, so that the non-specialized orthopedic surgeon also becomes familiar with that kind of surgery which is usually performed in tertiary centers. A special interest lays in the recent developments that promise for even better results and fewer complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4209493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42094932014-10-28 The Use of Megaprostheses for Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects in the Extremities: A Critical Review Gkavardina, Anthippi Tsagozis, Panagiotis Open Orthop J Article In the case of primary malignant tumors, extensive metastatic disease, major trauma or end-stage revision arthroplasty, the orthopaedic surgeon often has to deal with the need to reconstruct large skeletal defects, or replace bone of low quality. In the past years this was frequently impossible, and the only solution was amputation of the extremity. Later, the introduction of custom-made endoprostheses capable of reconstructing large skeletal defects, also known as megaprostheses, allowed for sparing of the extremity. This was especially valuable in the case of oncologic orthopaedic surgery, as advances in the medical treatment of sarcoma patients improved prognosis and limb-preserving surgery proved to have comparable patient survival rates to amputation. However, custom-made designs were implicated in frequent mechanical failures. Furthermore, they were extremely difficult to revise. The introduction of modular endoprostheses in the 1980s marked a new era in orthopaedic oncologic surgery. Modular megaprostheses consist of a number of different components in readily available sets, which can be assembled in various combinations to best address the specific bone defect. Moreover, they proved to have considerably lower rate of mechanical failures, which were also much easier to address during revision surgery by replacing only the parts that failed. The functional outcome after reconstruction with megasprostheses is often very satisfactory and the patient can enjoy a good quality of life. Nowadays, the major challenge is to eliminate the rate of non-mechanical complications associated with surgery of that magnitude, namely the risk for wound dehiscence and necrosis, deep infection, as well as local recurrence of the tumor. In our present mini-review, we attempt to make a critical approach of the available literature, focusing on the multiple aspects of reconstructive surgery using megaprostheses. We present the evolution of megasprosthetic implants, the indications for their use, and describe the outcome of surgery, so that the non-specialized orthopedic surgeon also becomes familiar with that kind of surgery which is usually performed in tertiary centers. A special interest lays in the recent developments that promise for even better results and fewer complications. Bentham Open 2014-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4209493/ /pubmed/25352933 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001408010384 Text en © Gkavardina and Tsagozis; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Gkavardina, Anthippi
Tsagozis, Panagiotis
The Use of Megaprostheses for Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects in the Extremities: A Critical Review
title The Use of Megaprostheses for Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects in the Extremities: A Critical Review
title_full The Use of Megaprostheses for Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects in the Extremities: A Critical Review
title_fullStr The Use of Megaprostheses for Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects in the Extremities: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Megaprostheses for Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects in the Extremities: A Critical Review
title_short The Use of Megaprostheses for Reconstruction of Large Skeletal Defects in the Extremities: A Critical Review
title_sort use of megaprostheses for reconstruction of large skeletal defects in the extremities: a critical review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352933
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874325001408010384
work_keys_str_mv AT gkavardinaanthippi theuseofmegaprosthesesforreconstructionoflargeskeletaldefectsintheextremitiesacriticalreview
AT tsagozispanagiotis theuseofmegaprosthesesforreconstructionoflargeskeletaldefectsintheextremitiesacriticalreview
AT gkavardinaanthippi useofmegaprosthesesforreconstructionoflargeskeletaldefectsintheextremitiesacriticalreview
AT tsagozispanagiotis useofmegaprosthesesforreconstructionoflargeskeletaldefectsintheextremitiesacriticalreview