Cargando…

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives

Screening has a central role in colorectal cancer (CRC) control. Different screening tests are effective in reducing CRC-specific mortality. Influence on cancer incidence depends on test sensitivity for pre-malignant lesions, ranging from almost no influence for guaiac-based fecal occult blood testi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stracci, Fabrizio, Zorzi, Manuel, Grazzini, Grazia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386553
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00210
_version_ 1782341300484308992
author Stracci, Fabrizio
Zorzi, Manuel
Grazzini, Grazia
author_facet Stracci, Fabrizio
Zorzi, Manuel
Grazzini, Grazia
author_sort Stracci, Fabrizio
collection PubMed
description Screening has a central role in colorectal cancer (CRC) control. Different screening tests are effective in reducing CRC-specific mortality. Influence on cancer incidence depends on test sensitivity for pre-malignant lesions, ranging from almost no influence for guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) to an estimated reduction of 66–90% for colonoscopy. Screening tests detect lesions indirectly in the stool [gFOBT, fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), and fecal DNA] or directly by colonic inspection [flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CT colonography (CTC), and capsule endoscopy]. CRC screening is cost-effective compared to no screening but no screening strategy is clearly better than the others. Stool tests are the most widely used in worldwide screening interventions. FIT will soon replace gFOBT. The use of colonoscopy as a screening test is increasing and this strategy has superseded all alternatives in the US and Germany. Despite its undisputed importance, CRC screening is under-used and participation rarely reaches 70% of target population. Strategies to increase participation include ensuring recommendation by physicians, introducing organized screening and developing new, more acceptable tests. Available evidence for DNA fecal testing, CTC, and capsule endoscopy is reviewed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4209818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42098182014-11-10 Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives Stracci, Fabrizio Zorzi, Manuel Grazzini, Grazia Front Public Health Public Health Screening has a central role in colorectal cancer (CRC) control. Different screening tests are effective in reducing CRC-specific mortality. Influence on cancer incidence depends on test sensitivity for pre-malignant lesions, ranging from almost no influence for guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) to an estimated reduction of 66–90% for colonoscopy. Screening tests detect lesions indirectly in the stool [gFOBT, fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), and fecal DNA] or directly by colonic inspection [flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CT colonography (CTC), and capsule endoscopy]. CRC screening is cost-effective compared to no screening but no screening strategy is clearly better than the others. Stool tests are the most widely used in worldwide screening interventions. FIT will soon replace gFOBT. The use of colonoscopy as a screening test is increasing and this strategy has superseded all alternatives in the US and Germany. Despite its undisputed importance, CRC screening is under-used and participation rarely reaches 70% of target population. Strategies to increase participation include ensuring recommendation by physicians, introducing organized screening and developing new, more acceptable tests. Available evidence for DNA fecal testing, CTC, and capsule endoscopy is reviewed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4209818/ /pubmed/25386553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00210 Text en Copyright © 2014 Stracci, Zorzi and Grazzini. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Stracci, Fabrizio
Zorzi, Manuel
Grazzini, Grazia
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives
title Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives
title_full Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives
title_fullStr Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives
title_short Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives
title_sort colorectal cancer screening: tests, strategies, and perspectives
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386553
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00210
work_keys_str_mv AT straccifabrizio colorectalcancerscreeningtestsstrategiesandperspectives
AT zorzimanuel colorectalcancerscreeningtestsstrategiesandperspectives
AT grazzinigrazia colorectalcancerscreeningtestsstrategiesandperspectives