Cargando…
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives
Screening has a central role in colorectal cancer (CRC) control. Different screening tests are effective in reducing CRC-specific mortality. Influence on cancer incidence depends on test sensitivity for pre-malignant lesions, ranging from almost no influence for guaiac-based fecal occult blood testi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00210 |
_version_ | 1782341300484308992 |
---|---|
author | Stracci, Fabrizio Zorzi, Manuel Grazzini, Grazia |
author_facet | Stracci, Fabrizio Zorzi, Manuel Grazzini, Grazia |
author_sort | Stracci, Fabrizio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Screening has a central role in colorectal cancer (CRC) control. Different screening tests are effective in reducing CRC-specific mortality. Influence on cancer incidence depends on test sensitivity for pre-malignant lesions, ranging from almost no influence for guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) to an estimated reduction of 66–90% for colonoscopy. Screening tests detect lesions indirectly in the stool [gFOBT, fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), and fecal DNA] or directly by colonic inspection [flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CT colonography (CTC), and capsule endoscopy]. CRC screening is cost-effective compared to no screening but no screening strategy is clearly better than the others. Stool tests are the most widely used in worldwide screening interventions. FIT will soon replace gFOBT. The use of colonoscopy as a screening test is increasing and this strategy has superseded all alternatives in the US and Germany. Despite its undisputed importance, CRC screening is under-used and participation rarely reaches 70% of target population. Strategies to increase participation include ensuring recommendation by physicians, introducing organized screening and developing new, more acceptable tests. Available evidence for DNA fecal testing, CTC, and capsule endoscopy is reviewed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4209818 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42098182014-11-10 Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives Stracci, Fabrizio Zorzi, Manuel Grazzini, Grazia Front Public Health Public Health Screening has a central role in colorectal cancer (CRC) control. Different screening tests are effective in reducing CRC-specific mortality. Influence on cancer incidence depends on test sensitivity for pre-malignant lesions, ranging from almost no influence for guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) to an estimated reduction of 66–90% for colonoscopy. Screening tests detect lesions indirectly in the stool [gFOBT, fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), and fecal DNA] or directly by colonic inspection [flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, CT colonography (CTC), and capsule endoscopy]. CRC screening is cost-effective compared to no screening but no screening strategy is clearly better than the others. Stool tests are the most widely used in worldwide screening interventions. FIT will soon replace gFOBT. The use of colonoscopy as a screening test is increasing and this strategy has superseded all alternatives in the US and Germany. Despite its undisputed importance, CRC screening is under-used and participation rarely reaches 70% of target population. Strategies to increase participation include ensuring recommendation by physicians, introducing organized screening and developing new, more acceptable tests. Available evidence for DNA fecal testing, CTC, and capsule endoscopy is reviewed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4209818/ /pubmed/25386553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00210 Text en Copyright © 2014 Stracci, Zorzi and Grazzini. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Stracci, Fabrizio Zorzi, Manuel Grazzini, Grazia Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives |
title | Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives |
title_full | Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives |
title_fullStr | Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives |
title_short | Colorectal Cancer Screening: Tests, Strategies, and Perspectives |
title_sort | colorectal cancer screening: tests, strategies, and perspectives |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209818/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386553 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT straccifabrizio colorectalcancerscreeningtestsstrategiesandperspectives AT zorzimanuel colorectalcancerscreeningtestsstrategiesandperspectives AT grazzinigrazia colorectalcancerscreeningtestsstrategiesandperspectives |