Cargando…

Application of F-18-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) Dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) for Defect Healing: A Comparison of Biomaterials in an Experimental Osteoporotic Rat Model

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to measure and compare the effect of various biomaterials for the healing of osteoporotic bone defects in the rat femur using (18)F-sodium fluoride dPET-CT. MATERIAL/METHODS: Osteoporosis was induced by ovariectomy and a calcium-restricted diet. After 3 m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Caixia, Alt, Volker, Pan, Leyun, Thormann, Ulrich, Schnettler, Reinhard, Strauss, Ludwig G., Heinemann, Sascha, Schumacher, Matthias, Gelinsky, Michael, Nies, Berthold, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25317537
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.891073
_version_ 1782341357244776448
author Cheng, Caixia
Alt, Volker
Pan, Leyun
Thormann, Ulrich
Schnettler, Reinhard
Strauss, Ludwig G.
Heinemann, Sascha
Schumacher, Matthias
Gelinsky, Michael
Nies, Berthold
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia
author_facet Cheng, Caixia
Alt, Volker
Pan, Leyun
Thormann, Ulrich
Schnettler, Reinhard
Strauss, Ludwig G.
Heinemann, Sascha
Schumacher, Matthias
Gelinsky, Michael
Nies, Berthold
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia
author_sort Cheng, Caixia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to measure and compare the effect of various biomaterials for the healing of osteoporotic bone defects in the rat femur using (18)F-sodium fluoride dPET-CT. MATERIAL/METHODS: Osteoporosis was induced by ovariectomy and a calcium-restricted diet. After 3 months, rats were operated on to create a 4-mm wedge-shaped defect in the distal metaphyseal femur. Bone substitution materials of calcium phosphate cement (CPC), composites of collagen and silica, and iron foams with interconnecting pores were inserted. Strontium or bisphosphonate, which are well known for having positive effects in osteoporosis treatment, were added into the materials. Eighteen weeks after osteoporosis induction and 6 weeks following femoral surgery, dPET-CT studies scan were performed with (18)F-Sodium Fluoride. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) and a 2-tissue compartmental learning-machine model (K1-k4, vessel density [VB], influx [ki]) were used for quantitative analysis. RESULTS: k3, reflecting the formation of fluoroapatite, revealed a statistically significant increase at the biomaterial-bone interface due to the Sr release from strontium-modified calcium phosphate cement (SrCPC) compared to CPC, which demonstrated enhanced new bone formation. In addition, k3 as measured in the porous scaffold silica/collagen xerogel (Sc-B30), showed a significant increase based on Wilcoxon rank-sum test (p<0.05) as compared with monolithic silica/collagen xerogel (B30) in the defect region. Furthermore, ki, reflecting the net plasma clearance of tracer to bone mineral measured in the iron foam with coating of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (Fe-BP), was enhanced as compared with plain iron foam (Fe) in the defect region. CONCLUSIONS: k3 was the most significant parameter for the characterization of healing processes and revealed the best differentiation between the 2 different biomaterials. PET scanning using (18)F-sodium fluoride seems to be a sensitive and useful method for evaluation of bone healing after replacement with these biomaterials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4210358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42103582014-10-28 Application of F-18-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) Dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) for Defect Healing: A Comparison of Biomaterials in an Experimental Osteoporotic Rat Model Cheng, Caixia Alt, Volker Pan, Leyun Thormann, Ulrich Schnettler, Reinhard Strauss, Ludwig G. Heinemann, Sascha Schumacher, Matthias Gelinsky, Michael Nies, Berthold Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia Med Sci Monit Animal Study BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to measure and compare the effect of various biomaterials for the healing of osteoporotic bone defects in the rat femur using (18)F-sodium fluoride dPET-CT. MATERIAL/METHODS: Osteoporosis was induced by ovariectomy and a calcium-restricted diet. After 3 months, rats were operated on to create a 4-mm wedge-shaped defect in the distal metaphyseal femur. Bone substitution materials of calcium phosphate cement (CPC), composites of collagen and silica, and iron foams with interconnecting pores were inserted. Strontium or bisphosphonate, which are well known for having positive effects in osteoporosis treatment, were added into the materials. Eighteen weeks after osteoporosis induction and 6 weeks following femoral surgery, dPET-CT studies scan were performed with (18)F-Sodium Fluoride. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) and a 2-tissue compartmental learning-machine model (K1-k4, vessel density [VB], influx [ki]) were used for quantitative analysis. RESULTS: k3, reflecting the formation of fluoroapatite, revealed a statistically significant increase at the biomaterial-bone interface due to the Sr release from strontium-modified calcium phosphate cement (SrCPC) compared to CPC, which demonstrated enhanced new bone formation. In addition, k3 as measured in the porous scaffold silica/collagen xerogel (Sc-B30), showed a significant increase based on Wilcoxon rank-sum test (p<0.05) as compared with monolithic silica/collagen xerogel (B30) in the defect region. Furthermore, ki, reflecting the net plasma clearance of tracer to bone mineral measured in the iron foam with coating of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (Fe-BP), was enhanced as compared with plain iron foam (Fe) in the defect region. CONCLUSIONS: k3 was the most significant parameter for the characterization of healing processes and revealed the best differentiation between the 2 different biomaterials. PET scanning using (18)F-sodium fluoride seems to be a sensitive and useful method for evaluation of bone healing after replacement with these biomaterials. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2014-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4210358/ /pubmed/25317537 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.891073 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
spellingShingle Animal Study
Cheng, Caixia
Alt, Volker
Pan, Leyun
Thormann, Ulrich
Schnettler, Reinhard
Strauss, Ludwig G.
Heinemann, Sascha
Schumacher, Matthias
Gelinsky, Michael
Nies, Berthold
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, Antonia
Application of F-18-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) Dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) for Defect Healing: A Comparison of Biomaterials in an Experimental Osteoporotic Rat Model
title Application of F-18-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) Dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) for Defect Healing: A Comparison of Biomaterials in an Experimental Osteoporotic Rat Model
title_full Application of F-18-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) Dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) for Defect Healing: A Comparison of Biomaterials in an Experimental Osteoporotic Rat Model
title_fullStr Application of F-18-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) Dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) for Defect Healing: A Comparison of Biomaterials in an Experimental Osteoporotic Rat Model
title_full_unstemmed Application of F-18-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) Dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) for Defect Healing: A Comparison of Biomaterials in an Experimental Osteoporotic Rat Model
title_short Application of F-18-Sodium Fluoride (NaF) Dynamic PET-CT (dPET-CT) for Defect Healing: A Comparison of Biomaterials in an Experimental Osteoporotic Rat Model
title_sort application of f-18-sodium fluoride (naf) dynamic pet-ct (dpet-ct) for defect healing: a comparison of biomaterials in an experimental osteoporotic rat model
topic Animal Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25317537
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.891073
work_keys_str_mv AT chengcaixia applicationoff18sodiumfluoridenafdynamicpetctdpetctfordefecthealingacomparisonofbiomaterialsinanexperimentalosteoporoticratmodel
AT altvolker applicationoff18sodiumfluoridenafdynamicpetctdpetctfordefecthealingacomparisonofbiomaterialsinanexperimentalosteoporoticratmodel
AT panleyun applicationoff18sodiumfluoridenafdynamicpetctdpetctfordefecthealingacomparisonofbiomaterialsinanexperimentalosteoporoticratmodel
AT thormannulrich applicationoff18sodiumfluoridenafdynamicpetctdpetctfordefecthealingacomparisonofbiomaterialsinanexperimentalosteoporoticratmodel
AT schnettlerreinhard applicationoff18sodiumfluoridenafdynamicpetctdpetctfordefecthealingacomparisonofbiomaterialsinanexperimentalosteoporoticratmodel
AT straussludwigg applicationoff18sodiumfluoridenafdynamicpetctdpetctfordefecthealingacomparisonofbiomaterialsinanexperimentalosteoporoticratmodel
AT heinemannsascha applicationoff18sodiumfluoridenafdynamicpetctdpetctfordefecthealingacomparisonofbiomaterialsinanexperimentalosteoporoticratmodel
AT schumachermatthias applicationoff18sodiumfluoridenafdynamicpetctdpetctfordefecthealingacomparisonofbiomaterialsinanexperimentalosteoporoticratmodel
AT gelinskymichael applicationoff18sodiumfluoridenafdynamicpetctdpetctfordefecthealingacomparisonofbiomaterialsinanexperimentalosteoporoticratmodel
AT niesberthold applicationoff18sodiumfluoridenafdynamicpetctdpetctfordefecthealingacomparisonofbiomaterialsinanexperimentalosteoporoticratmodel
AT dimitrakopouloustraussantonia applicationoff18sodiumfluoridenafdynamicpetctdpetctfordefecthealingacomparisonofbiomaterialsinanexperimentalosteoporoticratmodel