Cargando…
The specificity triad: notions of disease and therapeutic specificity in biomedical reasoning
Biomedicine is typically defined as the branch of medicine that is based on the principles of biology and biochemistry. A central tenet for biomedicine is the notion of disease and therapeutic specificity, i.e. the idea of tailored treatments for discrete disorders underpinned by specific pathologie...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25326797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-9-14 |
_version_ | 1782341357965148160 |
---|---|
author | Mulinari, Shai |
author_facet | Mulinari, Shai |
author_sort | Mulinari, Shai |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biomedicine is typically defined as the branch of medicine that is based on the principles of biology and biochemistry. A central tenet for biomedicine is the notion of disease and therapeutic specificity, i.e. the idea of tailored treatments for discrete disorders underpinned by specific pathologies. The present paper is concerned with how notions of disease and therapeutic specificity guide biomedical reasoning. To that end, the author proposes a model – the specificity triad – that draws on late philosopher and physician Ludwik Fleck’s concept of “style of thought” to offer a frame for investigating the intricate process through which links between disorders, mechanisms, and therapeutics are established by biomedicine. Next by applying the specificity triad model to scrutinize research efforts in two discrete areas of medicine—psychiatry and regenerative medicine—this paper seeks to stimulate pertinent discussions in and about biomedicine. These include discussions on the ambiguous epistemic status of psychiatry within contemporary biomedicine, as well as the relationship between developmental biology — historically relatively disjointed from biomedical enterprise — and the burgeoning field of regenerative medicine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4210362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42103622014-10-28 The specificity triad: notions of disease and therapeutic specificity in biomedical reasoning Mulinari, Shai Philos Ethics Humanit Med Research Biomedicine is typically defined as the branch of medicine that is based on the principles of biology and biochemistry. A central tenet for biomedicine is the notion of disease and therapeutic specificity, i.e. the idea of tailored treatments for discrete disorders underpinned by specific pathologies. The present paper is concerned with how notions of disease and therapeutic specificity guide biomedical reasoning. To that end, the author proposes a model – the specificity triad – that draws on late philosopher and physician Ludwik Fleck’s concept of “style of thought” to offer a frame for investigating the intricate process through which links between disorders, mechanisms, and therapeutics are established by biomedicine. Next by applying the specificity triad model to scrutinize research efforts in two discrete areas of medicine—psychiatry and regenerative medicine—this paper seeks to stimulate pertinent discussions in and about biomedicine. These include discussions on the ambiguous epistemic status of psychiatry within contemporary biomedicine, as well as the relationship between developmental biology — historically relatively disjointed from biomedical enterprise — and the burgeoning field of regenerative medicine. BioMed Central 2014-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4210362/ /pubmed/25326797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-9-14 Text en Copyright © 2014 Mulinari; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Mulinari, Shai The specificity triad: notions of disease and therapeutic specificity in biomedical reasoning |
title | The specificity triad: notions of disease and therapeutic specificity in biomedical reasoning |
title_full | The specificity triad: notions of disease and therapeutic specificity in biomedical reasoning |
title_fullStr | The specificity triad: notions of disease and therapeutic specificity in biomedical reasoning |
title_full_unstemmed | The specificity triad: notions of disease and therapeutic specificity in biomedical reasoning |
title_short | The specificity triad: notions of disease and therapeutic specificity in biomedical reasoning |
title_sort | specificity triad: notions of disease and therapeutic specificity in biomedical reasoning |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25326797 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-9-14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mulinarishai thespecificitytriadnotionsofdiseaseandtherapeuticspecificityinbiomedicalreasoning AT mulinarishai specificitytriadnotionsofdiseaseandtherapeuticspecificityinbiomedicalreasoning |