Cargando…
Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities
BACKGROUND: Despite significant investment in infrastructure many trials continue to face challenges in recruitment and retention. We argue that insufficient focus has been placed on the development and testing of recruitment and retention interventions. METHODS: In this current paper, we summarize...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25322807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-399 |
_version_ | 1782341393523408896 |
---|---|
author | Bower, Peter Brueton, Valerie Gamble, Carrol Treweek, Shaun Smith, Catrin Tudur Young, Bridget Williamson, Paula |
author_facet | Bower, Peter Brueton, Valerie Gamble, Carrol Treweek, Shaun Smith, Catrin Tudur Young, Bridget Williamson, Paula |
author_sort | Bower, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite significant investment in infrastructure many trials continue to face challenges in recruitment and retention. We argue that insufficient focus has been placed on the development and testing of recruitment and retention interventions. METHODS: In this current paper, we summarize existing reviews about interventions to improve recruitment and retention. We report survey data from Clinical Trials Units in the United Kingdom to indicate the range of interventions used by these units to encourage recruitment and retention. We present the views of participants in a recent workshop and a priority list of recruitment interventions for evaluation (determined by voting among workshop participants). We also discuss wider issues concerning the testing of recruitment interventions. RESULTS: Methods used to encourage recruitment and retention were categorized as: patient contact, patient convenience, support for recruiters, monitoring and systems, incentives, design, resources, and human factors. Interventions felt to merit investigation by respondents fell into three categories: training site staff, communication with patients, and incentives. CONCLUSIONS: Significant resources continue to be invested into clinical trials and other high quality studies, but recruitment remains a significant challenge. Adoption of innovative methods to develop, test, and implement recruitment interventions are required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-399) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4210542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42105422014-10-29 Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities Bower, Peter Brueton, Valerie Gamble, Carrol Treweek, Shaun Smith, Catrin Tudur Young, Bridget Williamson, Paula Trials Research BACKGROUND: Despite significant investment in infrastructure many trials continue to face challenges in recruitment and retention. We argue that insufficient focus has been placed on the development and testing of recruitment and retention interventions. METHODS: In this current paper, we summarize existing reviews about interventions to improve recruitment and retention. We report survey data from Clinical Trials Units in the United Kingdom to indicate the range of interventions used by these units to encourage recruitment and retention. We present the views of participants in a recent workshop and a priority list of recruitment interventions for evaluation (determined by voting among workshop participants). We also discuss wider issues concerning the testing of recruitment interventions. RESULTS: Methods used to encourage recruitment and retention were categorized as: patient contact, patient convenience, support for recruiters, monitoring and systems, incentives, design, resources, and human factors. Interventions felt to merit investigation by respondents fell into three categories: training site staff, communication with patients, and incentives. CONCLUSIONS: Significant resources continue to be invested into clinical trials and other high quality studies, but recruitment remains a significant challenge. Adoption of innovative methods to develop, test, and implement recruitment interventions are required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-399) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4210542/ /pubmed/25322807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-399 Text en © Bower et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Bower, Peter Brueton, Valerie Gamble, Carrol Treweek, Shaun Smith, Catrin Tudur Young, Bridget Williamson, Paula Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities |
title | Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities |
title_full | Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities |
title_fullStr | Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities |
title_full_unstemmed | Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities |
title_short | Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities |
title_sort | interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25322807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-399 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowerpeter interventionstoimproverecruitmentandretentioninclinicaltrialsasurveyandworkshoptoassesscurrentpracticeandfuturepriorities AT bruetonvalerie interventionstoimproverecruitmentandretentioninclinicaltrialsasurveyandworkshoptoassesscurrentpracticeandfuturepriorities AT gamblecarrol interventionstoimproverecruitmentandretentioninclinicaltrialsasurveyandworkshoptoassesscurrentpracticeandfuturepriorities AT treweekshaun interventionstoimproverecruitmentandretentioninclinicaltrialsasurveyandworkshoptoassesscurrentpracticeandfuturepriorities AT smithcatrintudur interventionstoimproverecruitmentandretentioninclinicaltrialsasurveyandworkshoptoassesscurrentpracticeandfuturepriorities AT youngbridget interventionstoimproverecruitmentandretentioninclinicaltrialsasurveyandworkshoptoassesscurrentpracticeandfuturepriorities AT williamsonpaula interventionstoimproverecruitmentandretentioninclinicaltrialsasurveyandworkshoptoassesscurrentpracticeandfuturepriorities |