Cargando…
Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance
BACKGROUND: Health Care Providers (HCPs) report that manual techniques of intravascular fluid resuscitation are commonly used during pediatric shock management. The optimal pediatric fluid resuscitation technique is currently unknown. We sought to determine HCP test-retest reliability (repeatability...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-724 |
_version_ | 1782341399082958848 |
---|---|
author | Parker, Melissa J Lee, Frank MH Mbuagbaw, Lawrence Thabane, Lehana |
author_facet | Parker, Melissa J Lee, Frank MH Mbuagbaw, Lawrence Thabane, Lehana |
author_sort | Parker, Melissa J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health Care Providers (HCPs) report that manual techniques of intravascular fluid resuscitation are commonly used during pediatric shock management. The optimal pediatric fluid resuscitation technique is currently unknown. We sought to determine HCP test-retest reliability (repeatability) and inter-subject variability of fluid resuscitation performance outcomes to inform the design of future studies. METHODS: Fifteen consenting HCPs from McMaster Children’s Hospital, in Hamilton, Canada participated in this single-arm interventional trial. Participants were oriented to a non-clinical model representing a 15 kg toddler, which incorporated a 22-gauge IV catheter. Following a standardization procedure, participants administered 600 mL (40 mL/kg) of saline to the simulated child under emergency conditions using prefilled 60-mL syringes. Each participant completed 5 testing trials. All testing was video recorded, with fluid administration time outcome data (in seconds) extracted from trial videos by two blinded outcome assessors. Data describing catheter dislodgement events, volume of saline effectively delivered, and participant demographics were also collected. The primary outcome of fluid administration time test-retest reliability was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and intra-class correlation (ICC), with good reliability defined as ICC > 0.70. RESULTS: Differences in HCP fluid administration times are attributable to inter-subject variability rather than intra-subject variability based on one-way ANOVA analysis, F (14,60) = 43.125; p < 0.001. Test-retest reliability of subjects was excellent with ICC = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99); p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate excellent test-retest reliability of HCP fluid resuscitation performance in a setting involving a non-clinical model. Investigators can justify a single evaluation of HCP performance in future studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-724) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4210565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42105652014-10-29 Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance Parker, Melissa J Lee, Frank MH Mbuagbaw, Lawrence Thabane, Lehana BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Health Care Providers (HCPs) report that manual techniques of intravascular fluid resuscitation are commonly used during pediatric shock management. The optimal pediatric fluid resuscitation technique is currently unknown. We sought to determine HCP test-retest reliability (repeatability) and inter-subject variability of fluid resuscitation performance outcomes to inform the design of future studies. METHODS: Fifteen consenting HCPs from McMaster Children’s Hospital, in Hamilton, Canada participated in this single-arm interventional trial. Participants were oriented to a non-clinical model representing a 15 kg toddler, which incorporated a 22-gauge IV catheter. Following a standardization procedure, participants administered 600 mL (40 mL/kg) of saline to the simulated child under emergency conditions using prefilled 60-mL syringes. Each participant completed 5 testing trials. All testing was video recorded, with fluid administration time outcome data (in seconds) extracted from trial videos by two blinded outcome assessors. Data describing catheter dislodgement events, volume of saline effectively delivered, and participant demographics were also collected. The primary outcome of fluid administration time test-retest reliability was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and intra-class correlation (ICC), with good reliability defined as ICC > 0.70. RESULTS: Differences in HCP fluid administration times are attributable to inter-subject variability rather than intra-subject variability based on one-way ANOVA analysis, F (14,60) = 43.125; p < 0.001. Test-retest reliability of subjects was excellent with ICC = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99); p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate excellent test-retest reliability of HCP fluid resuscitation performance in a setting involving a non-clinical model. Investigators can justify a single evaluation of HCP performance in future studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-724) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4210565/ /pubmed/25315062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-724 Text en © Parker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Parker, Melissa J Lee, Frank MH Mbuagbaw, Lawrence Thabane, Lehana Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance |
title | Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance |
title_full | Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance |
title_short | Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance |
title_sort | evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-724 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkermelissaj evaluatingthetestretestreliabilityandintersubjectvariabilityofhealthcareprovidermanualfluidresuscitationperformance AT leefrankmh evaluatingthetestretestreliabilityandintersubjectvariabilityofhealthcareprovidermanualfluidresuscitationperformance AT mbuagbawlawrence evaluatingthetestretestreliabilityandintersubjectvariabilityofhealthcareprovidermanualfluidresuscitationperformance AT thabanelehana evaluatingthetestretestreliabilityandintersubjectvariabilityofhealthcareprovidermanualfluidresuscitationperformance |