Cargando…

Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance

BACKGROUND: Health Care Providers (HCPs) report that manual techniques of intravascular fluid resuscitation are commonly used during pediatric shock management. The optimal pediatric fluid resuscitation technique is currently unknown. We sought to determine HCP test-retest reliability (repeatability...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parker, Melissa J, Lee, Frank MH, Mbuagbaw, Lawrence, Thabane, Lehana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-724
_version_ 1782341399082958848
author Parker, Melissa J
Lee, Frank MH
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Thabane, Lehana
author_facet Parker, Melissa J
Lee, Frank MH
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Thabane, Lehana
author_sort Parker, Melissa J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health Care Providers (HCPs) report that manual techniques of intravascular fluid resuscitation are commonly used during pediatric shock management. The optimal pediatric fluid resuscitation technique is currently unknown. We sought to determine HCP test-retest reliability (repeatability) and inter-subject variability of fluid resuscitation performance outcomes to inform the design of future studies. METHODS: Fifteen consenting HCPs from McMaster Children’s Hospital, in Hamilton, Canada participated in this single-arm interventional trial. Participants were oriented to a non-clinical model representing a 15 kg toddler, which incorporated a 22-gauge IV catheter. Following a standardization procedure, participants administered 600 mL (40 mL/kg) of saline to the simulated child under emergency conditions using prefilled 60-mL syringes. Each participant completed 5 testing trials. All testing was video recorded, with fluid administration time outcome data (in seconds) extracted from trial videos by two blinded outcome assessors. Data describing catheter dislodgement events, volume of saline effectively delivered, and participant demographics were also collected. The primary outcome of fluid administration time test-retest reliability was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and intra-class correlation (ICC), with good reliability defined as ICC > 0.70. RESULTS: Differences in HCP fluid administration times are attributable to inter-subject variability rather than intra-subject variability based on one-way ANOVA analysis, F (14,60) = 43.125; p < 0.001. Test-retest reliability of subjects was excellent with ICC = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99); p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate excellent test-retest reliability of HCP fluid resuscitation performance in a setting involving a non-clinical model. Investigators can justify a single evaluation of HCP performance in future studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-724) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4210565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42105652014-10-29 Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance Parker, Melissa J Lee, Frank MH Mbuagbaw, Lawrence Thabane, Lehana BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Health Care Providers (HCPs) report that manual techniques of intravascular fluid resuscitation are commonly used during pediatric shock management. The optimal pediatric fluid resuscitation technique is currently unknown. We sought to determine HCP test-retest reliability (repeatability) and inter-subject variability of fluid resuscitation performance outcomes to inform the design of future studies. METHODS: Fifteen consenting HCPs from McMaster Children’s Hospital, in Hamilton, Canada participated in this single-arm interventional trial. Participants were oriented to a non-clinical model representing a 15 kg toddler, which incorporated a 22-gauge IV catheter. Following a standardization procedure, participants administered 600 mL (40 mL/kg) of saline to the simulated child under emergency conditions using prefilled 60-mL syringes. Each participant completed 5 testing trials. All testing was video recorded, with fluid administration time outcome data (in seconds) extracted from trial videos by two blinded outcome assessors. Data describing catheter dislodgement events, volume of saline effectively delivered, and participant demographics were also collected. The primary outcome of fluid administration time test-retest reliability was analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and intra-class correlation (ICC), with good reliability defined as ICC > 0.70. RESULTS: Differences in HCP fluid administration times are attributable to inter-subject variability rather than intra-subject variability based on one-way ANOVA analysis, F (14,60) = 43.125; p < 0.001. Test-retest reliability of subjects was excellent with ICC = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99); p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate excellent test-retest reliability of HCP fluid resuscitation performance in a setting involving a non-clinical model. Investigators can justify a single evaluation of HCP performance in future studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-724) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4210565/ /pubmed/25315062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-724 Text en © Parker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Parker, Melissa J
Lee, Frank MH
Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
Thabane, Lehana
Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance
title Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance
title_full Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance
title_fullStr Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance
title_short Evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance
title_sort evaluating the test re-test reliability and inter-subject variability of health care provider manual fluid resuscitation performance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25315062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-724
work_keys_str_mv AT parkermelissaj evaluatingthetestretestreliabilityandintersubjectvariabilityofhealthcareprovidermanualfluidresuscitationperformance
AT leefrankmh evaluatingthetestretestreliabilityandintersubjectvariabilityofhealthcareprovidermanualfluidresuscitationperformance
AT mbuagbawlawrence evaluatingthetestretestreliabilityandintersubjectvariabilityofhealthcareprovidermanualfluidresuscitationperformance
AT thabanelehana evaluatingthetestretestreliabilityandintersubjectvariabilityofhealthcareprovidermanualfluidresuscitationperformance