Cargando…

A decade of investments in monitoring the HIV epidemic: how far have we come? A descriptive analysis

BACKGROUND: The 2001 Declaration of Commitment (DoC) adopted by the General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS (UNGASS) included a call to monitor national responses to the HIV epidemic. Since the DoC, efforts and investments have been made globally to strengthen countries’ HIV monitoring and eval...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alfven, Tobias, McDougal, Lotus, Frescura, Luisa, Aran, Christian, Amler, Paul, Gill, Wayne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25322764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-62
_version_ 1782341403682013184
author Alfven, Tobias
McDougal, Lotus
Frescura, Luisa
Aran, Christian
Amler, Paul
Gill, Wayne
author_facet Alfven, Tobias
McDougal, Lotus
Frescura, Luisa
Aran, Christian
Amler, Paul
Gill, Wayne
author_sort Alfven, Tobias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 2001 Declaration of Commitment (DoC) adopted by the General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS (UNGASS) included a call to monitor national responses to the HIV epidemic. Since the DoC, efforts and investments have been made globally to strengthen countries’ HIV monitoring and evaluation (M&E) capacity. This analysis aims to quantify HIV M&E investments, commitments, capacity, and performance during the last decade in order to assess the success and challenges of national and global HIV M&E systems. METHODS: M&E spending and performance was assessed using data from UNGASS country progress reports. The National Composite Policy Index (NCPI) was used to measure government commitment, government engagement, partner/civil society engagement, and data generation, as well as to generate a composite HIV M&E System Capacity Index (MESCI) score. Analyses were restricted to low and middle income countries (LMICs) who submitted NCPI reports in 2006, 2008, and 2010 (n =78). RESULTS: Government commitment to HIV M&E increased considerably between 2006 and 2008 but decreased between 2008 and 2010. The percentage of total AIDS spending allocated to HIV M&E increased from 1.1% to 1.4%, between 2007 and 2010, in high-burden LMICs. Partner/civil society engagement and data generation capacity improved between 2006 and 2010 in the high-burden countries. The HIV MESCI increased from 2006 to 2008 in high-burden countries (78% to 94%), as well as in other LMICs (70% to 77%), and remained relatively stable in 2010 (91% in high-burden countries, 79% in other LMICs). Among high-burden countries, M&E system performance increased from 52% in 2006 to 89% in 2010. CONCLUSIONS: The last decade has seen increased commitments and spending on HIV M&E, as well as improved M&E capacity and more available data on the HIV epidemic in both high-burden and other LMICs. However, challenges remain in the global M&E of the AIDS epidemic as we approach the 2015 Millennium Development Goal targets. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1478-4505-12-62) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4210584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42105842014-10-29 A decade of investments in monitoring the HIV epidemic: how far have we come? A descriptive analysis Alfven, Tobias McDougal, Lotus Frescura, Luisa Aran, Christian Amler, Paul Gill, Wayne Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: The 2001 Declaration of Commitment (DoC) adopted by the General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS (UNGASS) included a call to monitor national responses to the HIV epidemic. Since the DoC, efforts and investments have been made globally to strengthen countries’ HIV monitoring and evaluation (M&E) capacity. This analysis aims to quantify HIV M&E investments, commitments, capacity, and performance during the last decade in order to assess the success and challenges of national and global HIV M&E systems. METHODS: M&E spending and performance was assessed using data from UNGASS country progress reports. The National Composite Policy Index (NCPI) was used to measure government commitment, government engagement, partner/civil society engagement, and data generation, as well as to generate a composite HIV M&E System Capacity Index (MESCI) score. Analyses were restricted to low and middle income countries (LMICs) who submitted NCPI reports in 2006, 2008, and 2010 (n =78). RESULTS: Government commitment to HIV M&E increased considerably between 2006 and 2008 but decreased between 2008 and 2010. The percentage of total AIDS spending allocated to HIV M&E increased from 1.1% to 1.4%, between 2007 and 2010, in high-burden LMICs. Partner/civil society engagement and data generation capacity improved between 2006 and 2010 in the high-burden countries. The HIV MESCI increased from 2006 to 2008 in high-burden countries (78% to 94%), as well as in other LMICs (70% to 77%), and remained relatively stable in 2010 (91% in high-burden countries, 79% in other LMICs). Among high-burden countries, M&E system performance increased from 52% in 2006 to 89% in 2010. CONCLUSIONS: The last decade has seen increased commitments and spending on HIV M&E, as well as improved M&E capacity and more available data on the HIV epidemic in both high-burden and other LMICs. However, challenges remain in the global M&E of the AIDS epidemic as we approach the 2015 Millennium Development Goal targets. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1478-4505-12-62) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4210584/ /pubmed/25322764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-62 Text en © Alfven et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Alfven, Tobias
McDougal, Lotus
Frescura, Luisa
Aran, Christian
Amler, Paul
Gill, Wayne
A decade of investments in monitoring the HIV epidemic: how far have we come? A descriptive analysis
title A decade of investments in monitoring the HIV epidemic: how far have we come? A descriptive analysis
title_full A decade of investments in monitoring the HIV epidemic: how far have we come? A descriptive analysis
title_fullStr A decade of investments in monitoring the HIV epidemic: how far have we come? A descriptive analysis
title_full_unstemmed A decade of investments in monitoring the HIV epidemic: how far have we come? A descriptive analysis
title_short A decade of investments in monitoring the HIV epidemic: how far have we come? A descriptive analysis
title_sort decade of investments in monitoring the hiv epidemic: how far have we come? a descriptive analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25322764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-62
work_keys_str_mv AT alfventobias adecadeofinvestmentsinmonitoringthehivepidemichowfarhavewecomeadescriptiveanalysis
AT mcdougallotus adecadeofinvestmentsinmonitoringthehivepidemichowfarhavewecomeadescriptiveanalysis
AT frescuraluisa adecadeofinvestmentsinmonitoringthehivepidemichowfarhavewecomeadescriptiveanalysis
AT aranchristian adecadeofinvestmentsinmonitoringthehivepidemichowfarhavewecomeadescriptiveanalysis
AT amlerpaul adecadeofinvestmentsinmonitoringthehivepidemichowfarhavewecomeadescriptiveanalysis
AT gillwayne adecadeofinvestmentsinmonitoringthehivepidemichowfarhavewecomeadescriptiveanalysis
AT alfventobias decadeofinvestmentsinmonitoringthehivepidemichowfarhavewecomeadescriptiveanalysis
AT mcdougallotus decadeofinvestmentsinmonitoringthehivepidemichowfarhavewecomeadescriptiveanalysis
AT frescuraluisa decadeofinvestmentsinmonitoringthehivepidemichowfarhavewecomeadescriptiveanalysis
AT aranchristian decadeofinvestmentsinmonitoringthehivepidemichowfarhavewecomeadescriptiveanalysis
AT amlerpaul decadeofinvestmentsinmonitoringthehivepidemichowfarhavewecomeadescriptiveanalysis
AT gillwayne decadeofinvestmentsinmonitoringthehivepidemichowfarhavewecomeadescriptiveanalysis