Cargando…

Ranibizumab, Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy or Observation for the Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Cost Effectiveness in the UK

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of ranibizumab compared with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT) or no treatment (observation) in patients with visual impairment due to myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV). METHODS: A Markov model with health states def...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claxton, Lindsay, Malcolm, Bill, Taylor, Matthew, Haig, Jennifer, Leteneux, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25300507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-014-0216-y
_version_ 1782341417206546432
author Claxton, Lindsay
Malcolm, Bill
Taylor, Matthew
Haig, Jennifer
Leteneux, Claudia
author_facet Claxton, Lindsay
Malcolm, Bill
Taylor, Matthew
Haig, Jennifer
Leteneux, Claudia
author_sort Claxton, Lindsay
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of ranibizumab compared with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT) or no treatment (observation) in patients with visual impairment due to myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV). METHODS: A Markov model with health states defined by best-corrected visual acuity and a 3-month cycle length was developed. It had a healthcare provider (UK National Health Service and personal social services) perspective, a lifetime time horizon, and was based on 2011 prices; future costs and health outcomes were discounted at 3.5 % per annum. Baseline characteristics were based on the phase III RADIANCE (Ranibizumab and vPDT Evaluation in Myopic CNV) study, and year 1 health-state transitions were based on this and the VIP (Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy) study. Extensive sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the model. RESULTS: The lifetime cost of treating myopic CNV with ranibizumab was £12,866, whereas vPDT and observation were associated with total costs of £14,421 and £8,163, respectively. Ranibizumab treatment produced higher cumulative quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs; 12.99) than vPDT (12.60) or observation (12.45). Ranibizumab treatment was therefore dominant, with greater health gains and lower overall costs than vPDT. Ranibizumab was cost effective compared with observation, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £8,778/QALY. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, ranibizumab had a 100 % and 88 % probability of being cost effective compared with vPDT and observation, respectively, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that ranibizumab therapy is dominant over vPDT for the treatment of visual impairment due to CNV secondary to pathologic myopia in the UK healthcare setting and cost effective compared with observation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40266-014-0216-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4210643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42106432014-10-31 Ranibizumab, Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy or Observation for the Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Cost Effectiveness in the UK Claxton, Lindsay Malcolm, Bill Taylor, Matthew Haig, Jennifer Leteneux, Claudia Drugs Aging Original Research Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of ranibizumab compared with verteporfin photodynamic therapy (vPDT) or no treatment (observation) in patients with visual impairment due to myopic choroidal neovascularization (CNV). METHODS: A Markov model with health states defined by best-corrected visual acuity and a 3-month cycle length was developed. It had a healthcare provider (UK National Health Service and personal social services) perspective, a lifetime time horizon, and was based on 2011 prices; future costs and health outcomes were discounted at 3.5 % per annum. Baseline characteristics were based on the phase III RADIANCE (Ranibizumab and vPDT Evaluation in Myopic CNV) study, and year 1 health-state transitions were based on this and the VIP (Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy) study. Extensive sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the model. RESULTS: The lifetime cost of treating myopic CNV with ranibizumab was £12,866, whereas vPDT and observation were associated with total costs of £14,421 and £8,163, respectively. Ranibizumab treatment produced higher cumulative quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs; 12.99) than vPDT (12.60) or observation (12.45). Ranibizumab treatment was therefore dominant, with greater health gains and lower overall costs than vPDT. Ranibizumab was cost effective compared with observation, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £8,778/QALY. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, ranibizumab had a 100 % and 88 % probability of being cost effective compared with vPDT and observation, respectively, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that ranibizumab therapy is dominant over vPDT for the treatment of visual impairment due to CNV secondary to pathologic myopia in the UK healthcare setting and cost effective compared with observation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40266-014-0216-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2014-10-10 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4210643/ /pubmed/25300507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-014-0216-y Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Claxton, Lindsay
Malcolm, Bill
Taylor, Matthew
Haig, Jennifer
Leteneux, Claudia
Ranibizumab, Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy or Observation for the Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Cost Effectiveness in the UK
title Ranibizumab, Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy or Observation for the Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Cost Effectiveness in the UK
title_full Ranibizumab, Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy or Observation for the Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Cost Effectiveness in the UK
title_fullStr Ranibizumab, Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy or Observation for the Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Cost Effectiveness in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Ranibizumab, Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy or Observation for the Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Cost Effectiveness in the UK
title_short Ranibizumab, Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy or Observation for the Treatment of Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization: Cost Effectiveness in the UK
title_sort ranibizumab, verteporfin photodynamic therapy or observation for the treatment of myopic choroidal neovascularization: cost effectiveness in the uk
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4210643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25300507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40266-014-0216-y
work_keys_str_mv AT claxtonlindsay ranibizumabverteporfinphotodynamictherapyorobservationforthetreatmentofmyopicchoroidalneovascularizationcosteffectivenessintheuk
AT malcolmbill ranibizumabverteporfinphotodynamictherapyorobservationforthetreatmentofmyopicchoroidalneovascularizationcosteffectivenessintheuk
AT taylormatthew ranibizumabverteporfinphotodynamictherapyorobservationforthetreatmentofmyopicchoroidalneovascularizationcosteffectivenessintheuk
AT haigjennifer ranibizumabverteporfinphotodynamictherapyorobservationforthetreatmentofmyopicchoroidalneovascularizationcosteffectivenessintheuk
AT leteneuxclaudia ranibizumabverteporfinphotodynamictherapyorobservationforthetreatmentofmyopicchoroidalneovascularizationcosteffectivenessintheuk