Cargando…
Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening
Screening is one possible tool for monitoring infectious diseases among migrants. However, there is limited information on screening programmes targeted for newly arrived migrants in EU/EEA countries. Our aim was to investigate the implementation, practices and usefulness of these programmes. We con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111011004 |
_version_ | 1782341495926292480 |
---|---|
author | Kärki, Tommi Napoli, Christian Riccardo, Flavia Fabiani, Massimo Dente, Maria Grazia Carballo, Manuel Noori, Teymur Declich, Silvia |
author_facet | Kärki, Tommi Napoli, Christian Riccardo, Flavia Fabiani, Massimo Dente, Maria Grazia Carballo, Manuel Noori, Teymur Declich, Silvia |
author_sort | Kärki, Tommi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Screening is one possible tool for monitoring infectious diseases among migrants. However, there is limited information on screening programmes targeted for newly arrived migrants in EU/EEA countries. Our aim was to investigate the implementation, practices and usefulness of these programmes. We conducted a survey among country experts from EU/EEA countries and Switzerland, asking whether their countries had implemented screening programmes. We also estimated the association between the implementation of these programmes and the rate of asylum-seekers in the population. Of the countries, 16 (59%) had implemented screening programmes and 15 (56%) had national guidelines. The rate of asylum-seekers was associated with implementation of screening programmes (p = 0.014). Screening was performed most often for tuberculosis; most commonly on holding level, and was targeted to specific migrant groups in over half of the countries performing screening. Twenty-five of all the country experts (96%) considered screening among migrants useful, and 24 (92%) would welcome EU level guidelines for screening. The implementation of screening programmes varied, and the practices were different among countries. Our survey suggests, that establishing EU level guidelines for screening would be useful, although they would have to take into account differences between individual countries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4211019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42110192014-10-28 Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening Kärki, Tommi Napoli, Christian Riccardo, Flavia Fabiani, Massimo Dente, Maria Grazia Carballo, Manuel Noori, Teymur Declich, Silvia Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Screening is one possible tool for monitoring infectious diseases among migrants. However, there is limited information on screening programmes targeted for newly arrived migrants in EU/EEA countries. Our aim was to investigate the implementation, practices and usefulness of these programmes. We conducted a survey among country experts from EU/EEA countries and Switzerland, asking whether their countries had implemented screening programmes. We also estimated the association between the implementation of these programmes and the rate of asylum-seekers in the population. Of the countries, 16 (59%) had implemented screening programmes and 15 (56%) had national guidelines. The rate of asylum-seekers was associated with implementation of screening programmes (p = 0.014). Screening was performed most often for tuberculosis; most commonly on holding level, and was targeted to specific migrant groups in over half of the countries performing screening. Twenty-five of all the country experts (96%) considered screening among migrants useful, and 24 (92%) would welcome EU level guidelines for screening. The implementation of screening programmes varied, and the practices were different among countries. Our survey suggests, that establishing EU level guidelines for screening would be useful, although they would have to take into account differences between individual countries. MDPI 2014-10-21 2014-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4211019/ /pubmed/25337945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111011004 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kärki, Tommi Napoli, Christian Riccardo, Flavia Fabiani, Massimo Dente, Maria Grazia Carballo, Manuel Noori, Teymur Declich, Silvia Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening |
title | Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening |
title_full | Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening |
title_fullStr | Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening |
title_short | Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening |
title_sort | screening for infectious diseases among newly arrived migrants in eu/eea countries—varying practices but consensus on the utility of screening |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111011004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karkitommi screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening AT napolichristian screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening AT riccardoflavia screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening AT fabianimassimo screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening AT dentemariagrazia screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening AT carballomanuel screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening AT nooriteymur screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening AT declichsilvia screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening |