Cargando…

Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening

Screening is one possible tool for monitoring infectious diseases among migrants. However, there is limited information on screening programmes targeted for newly arrived migrants in EU/EEA countries. Our aim was to investigate the implementation, practices and usefulness of these programmes. We con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kärki, Tommi, Napoli, Christian, Riccardo, Flavia, Fabiani, Massimo, Dente, Maria Grazia, Carballo, Manuel, Noori, Teymur, Declich, Silvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111011004
_version_ 1782341495926292480
author Kärki, Tommi
Napoli, Christian
Riccardo, Flavia
Fabiani, Massimo
Dente, Maria Grazia
Carballo, Manuel
Noori, Teymur
Declich, Silvia
author_facet Kärki, Tommi
Napoli, Christian
Riccardo, Flavia
Fabiani, Massimo
Dente, Maria Grazia
Carballo, Manuel
Noori, Teymur
Declich, Silvia
author_sort Kärki, Tommi
collection PubMed
description Screening is one possible tool for monitoring infectious diseases among migrants. However, there is limited information on screening programmes targeted for newly arrived migrants in EU/EEA countries. Our aim was to investigate the implementation, practices and usefulness of these programmes. We conducted a survey among country experts from EU/EEA countries and Switzerland, asking whether their countries had implemented screening programmes. We also estimated the association between the implementation of these programmes and the rate of asylum-seekers in the population. Of the countries, 16 (59%) had implemented screening programmes and 15 (56%) had national guidelines. The rate of asylum-seekers was associated with implementation of screening programmes (p = 0.014). Screening was performed most often for tuberculosis; most commonly on holding level, and was targeted to specific migrant groups in over half of the countries performing screening. Twenty-five of all the country experts (96%) considered screening among migrants useful, and 24 (92%) would welcome EU level guidelines for screening. The implementation of screening programmes varied, and the practices were different among countries. Our survey suggests, that establishing EU level guidelines for screening would be useful, although they would have to take into account differences between individual countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4211019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42110192014-10-28 Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening Kärki, Tommi Napoli, Christian Riccardo, Flavia Fabiani, Massimo Dente, Maria Grazia Carballo, Manuel Noori, Teymur Declich, Silvia Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Screening is one possible tool for monitoring infectious diseases among migrants. However, there is limited information on screening programmes targeted for newly arrived migrants in EU/EEA countries. Our aim was to investigate the implementation, practices and usefulness of these programmes. We conducted a survey among country experts from EU/EEA countries and Switzerland, asking whether their countries had implemented screening programmes. We also estimated the association between the implementation of these programmes and the rate of asylum-seekers in the population. Of the countries, 16 (59%) had implemented screening programmes and 15 (56%) had national guidelines. The rate of asylum-seekers was associated with implementation of screening programmes (p = 0.014). Screening was performed most often for tuberculosis; most commonly on holding level, and was targeted to specific migrant groups in over half of the countries performing screening. Twenty-five of all the country experts (96%) considered screening among migrants useful, and 24 (92%) would welcome EU level guidelines for screening. The implementation of screening programmes varied, and the practices were different among countries. Our survey suggests, that establishing EU level guidelines for screening would be useful, although they would have to take into account differences between individual countries. MDPI 2014-10-21 2014-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4211019/ /pubmed/25337945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111011004 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kärki, Tommi
Napoli, Christian
Riccardo, Flavia
Fabiani, Massimo
Dente, Maria Grazia
Carballo, Manuel
Noori, Teymur
Declich, Silvia
Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening
title Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening
title_full Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening
title_fullStr Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening
title_full_unstemmed Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening
title_short Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants in EU/EEA Countries—Varying Practices but Consensus on the Utility of Screening
title_sort screening for infectious diseases among newly arrived migrants in eu/eea countries—varying practices but consensus on the utility of screening
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111011004
work_keys_str_mv AT karkitommi screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening
AT napolichristian screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening
AT riccardoflavia screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening
AT fabianimassimo screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening
AT dentemariagrazia screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening
AT carballomanuel screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening
AT nooriteymur screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening
AT declichsilvia screeningforinfectiousdiseasesamongnewlyarrivedmigrantsineueeacountriesvaryingpracticesbutconsensusontheutilityofscreening