Cargando…

Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: scanning electron microscopy analysis

PURPOSE: Topographic analysis of treated ceramics provides qualitative information regarding the surface texture affecting the micromechanical retention and locking of resin-ceramics. This study aims to compare the surface microstructure following different surface treatments of feldspathic porcelai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valian, Azam, Moravej-Salehi, Elham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352961
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.387
_version_ 1782341503522177024
author Valian, Azam
Moravej-Salehi, Elham
author_facet Valian, Azam
Moravej-Salehi, Elham
author_sort Valian, Azam
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Topographic analysis of treated ceramics provides qualitative information regarding the surface texture affecting the micromechanical retention and locking of resin-ceramics. This study aims to compare the surface microstructure following different surface treatments of feldspathic porcelain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in-vitro study was conducted on 72 porcelain discs randomly divided into 12 groups (n=6). In 9 groups, feldspathic surfaces were subjected to sandblasting at 2, 3 or 4 bar pressure for 5, 10 or 15 seconds with 50 µm alumina particles at a 5 mm distance. In group 10, 9.5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) gel was applied for 120 seconds. In group 11, specimens were sandblasted at 3 bar pressure for 10 seconds and then conditioned with HF. In group 12, specimens were first treated with HF and then sandblasted at 3 bar pressure for 10 seconds. All specimens were then evaluated under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at different magnifications. RESULTS: SEM images of HF treated specimens revealed deep porosities of variable sizes; whereas, the sandblasted surfaces were more homogenous and had sharper peaks. Increasing the pressure and duration of sandblasting increased the surface roughness. SEM images of the two combined techniques showed that in group 11 (sandblasted first), HF caused deeper porosities; whereas in group 12 (treated with HF first) sandblasting caused irregularities with less homogeneity. CONCLUSION: All surface treatments increased the surface area and caused porous surfaces. In groups subjected to HF, the porosities were deeper than those in sandblasted only groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4211055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42110552014-10-28 Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: scanning electron microscopy analysis Valian, Azam Moravej-Salehi, Elham J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: Topographic analysis of treated ceramics provides qualitative information regarding the surface texture affecting the micromechanical retention and locking of resin-ceramics. This study aims to compare the surface microstructure following different surface treatments of feldspathic porcelain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This in-vitro study was conducted on 72 porcelain discs randomly divided into 12 groups (n=6). In 9 groups, feldspathic surfaces were subjected to sandblasting at 2, 3 or 4 bar pressure for 5, 10 or 15 seconds with 50 µm alumina particles at a 5 mm distance. In group 10, 9.5% hydrofluoric acid (HF) gel was applied for 120 seconds. In group 11, specimens were sandblasted at 3 bar pressure for 10 seconds and then conditioned with HF. In group 12, specimens were first treated with HF and then sandblasted at 3 bar pressure for 10 seconds. All specimens were then evaluated under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at different magnifications. RESULTS: SEM images of HF treated specimens revealed deep porosities of variable sizes; whereas, the sandblasted surfaces were more homogenous and had sharper peaks. Increasing the pressure and duration of sandblasting increased the surface roughness. SEM images of the two combined techniques showed that in group 11 (sandblasted first), HF caused deeper porosities; whereas in group 12 (treated with HF first) sandblasting caused irregularities with less homogeneity. CONCLUSION: All surface treatments increased the surface area and caused porous surfaces. In groups subjected to HF, the porosities were deeper than those in sandblasted only groups. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2014-10 2014-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4211055/ /pubmed/25352961 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.387 Text en © 2014 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Valian, Azam
Moravej-Salehi, Elham
Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: scanning electron microscopy analysis
title Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: scanning electron microscopy analysis
title_full Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: scanning electron microscopy analysis
title_fullStr Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: scanning electron microscopy analysis
title_full_unstemmed Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: scanning electron microscopy analysis
title_short Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: scanning electron microscopy analysis
title_sort surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: scanning electron microscopy analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352961
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.387
work_keys_str_mv AT valianazam surfacetreatmentoffeldspathicporcelainscanningelectronmicroscopyanalysis
AT moravejsalehielham surfacetreatmentoffeldspathicporcelainscanningelectronmicroscopyanalysis