Cargando…
Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility for Radial, Circumferential and Longitudinal Strain Echocardiography
OBJECTIVES: Strain echocardiography (StE) promises to be a new tool for quantitative assessment of cardiac function. Analysis of intra- and interobserver reliability is an important aspect in the process of developing these novel techniques from theory to the implementation into daily routine diagno...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25356089 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874192401408010102 |
_version_ | 1782341517320388608 |
---|---|
author | Leischik, R. Dworrak, B. Hensel, K. |
author_facet | Leischik, R. Dworrak, B. Hensel, K. |
author_sort | Leischik, R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Strain echocardiography (StE) promises to be a new tool for quantitative assessment of cardiac function. Analysis of intra- and interobserver reliability is an important aspect in the process of developing these novel techniques from theory to the implementation into daily routine diagnostics.The purpose of the study was to estimate reliability of the segmental StE. METHODS: Left ventricular strain analysis for radial strain (RS), circumferential strain (CS) and longitudinal strain (LS) was performed in 21 healthy volunteers. RS and CS values were obtained in the parasternal short axis at the level of the papillary muscles. LS values were determined in the apical 2-, 3- and 4-chamber views. Cine-loops were recorded and quantitative analyses were conducted on an off-line workstation. RESULTS: Intraobserver reproducibility was highest using LS in the 4-chamber view (9 ± 13.6 % mean deviation, rho = 0.624, p = 0.003), followed by CS (13.3 ± 8.3 %, rho = 0.406, p = 0.068) and lowest in RS (26.3 ± 30.1 %, rho = 0.391, p = 0.080). Interobserver analyses of LS derived from 3-chamber view showed lowest deviation (11.9 ± 9.5 %, rho = 0.513, p = 0.017), followed by CS (15.2 ± 12.0 %, 0.263, p = 0.249) and the least consistent measurements in RS (35.9 ± 46.3 %, rho 0.382, p = 0.088). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the clinical utility of StE depends on the regional differences of LV wall motion and image quality. LS-values showed promising intra- and interobserver reproducibility values. For quantitative follow-up studies LS should be preferred. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4211138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42111382014-10-29 Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility for Radial, Circumferential and Longitudinal Strain Echocardiography Leischik, R. Dworrak, B. Hensel, K. Open Cardiovasc Med J Article OBJECTIVES: Strain echocardiography (StE) promises to be a new tool for quantitative assessment of cardiac function. Analysis of intra- and interobserver reliability is an important aspect in the process of developing these novel techniques from theory to the implementation into daily routine diagnostics.The purpose of the study was to estimate reliability of the segmental StE. METHODS: Left ventricular strain analysis for radial strain (RS), circumferential strain (CS) and longitudinal strain (LS) was performed in 21 healthy volunteers. RS and CS values were obtained in the parasternal short axis at the level of the papillary muscles. LS values were determined in the apical 2-, 3- and 4-chamber views. Cine-loops were recorded and quantitative analyses were conducted on an off-line workstation. RESULTS: Intraobserver reproducibility was highest using LS in the 4-chamber view (9 ± 13.6 % mean deviation, rho = 0.624, p = 0.003), followed by CS (13.3 ± 8.3 %, rho = 0.406, p = 0.068) and lowest in RS (26.3 ± 30.1 %, rho = 0.391, p = 0.080). Interobserver analyses of LS derived from 3-chamber view showed lowest deviation (11.9 ± 9.5 %, rho = 0.513, p = 0.017), followed by CS (15.2 ± 12.0 %, 0.263, p = 0.249) and the least consistent measurements in RS (35.9 ± 46.3 %, rho 0.382, p = 0.088). CONCLUSION: This study shows that the clinical utility of StE depends on the regional differences of LV wall motion and image quality. LS-values showed promising intra- and interobserver reproducibility values. For quantitative follow-up studies LS should be preferred. Bentham Open 2014-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4211138/ /pubmed/25356089 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874192401408010102 Text en © Leischik et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Leischik, R. Dworrak, B. Hensel, K. Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility for Radial, Circumferential and Longitudinal Strain Echocardiography |
title | Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility for Radial, Circumferential and Longitudinal Strain Echocardiography |
title_full | Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility for Radial, Circumferential and Longitudinal Strain Echocardiography |
title_fullStr | Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility for Radial, Circumferential and Longitudinal Strain Echocardiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility for Radial, Circumferential and Longitudinal Strain Echocardiography |
title_short | Intraobserver and Interobserver Reproducibility for Radial, Circumferential and Longitudinal Strain Echocardiography |
title_sort | intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility for radial, circumferential and longitudinal strain echocardiography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25356089 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874192401408010102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leischikr intraobserverandinterobserverreproducibilityforradialcircumferentialandlongitudinalstrainechocardiography AT dworrakb intraobserverandinterobserverreproducibilityforradialcircumferentialandlongitudinalstrainechocardiography AT henselk intraobserverandinterobserverreproducibilityforradialcircumferentialandlongitudinalstrainechocardiography |