Cargando…

Directional interactions between current and prior saccades

One way to explore how prior sensory and motor events impact eye movements is to ask someone to look to targets located about a central point, returning gaze to the central point after each eye movement. Concerned about the contribution of this return to center movement, Anderson et al. (2008) used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Stephanie A. H., Cowper-Smith, Christopher D., Westwood, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389401
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00872
_version_ 1782341546836754432
author Jones, Stephanie A. H.
Cowper-Smith, Christopher D.
Westwood, David A.
author_facet Jones, Stephanie A. H.
Cowper-Smith, Christopher D.
Westwood, David A.
author_sort Jones, Stephanie A. H.
collection PubMed
description One way to explore how prior sensory and motor events impact eye movements is to ask someone to look to targets located about a central point, returning gaze to the central point after each eye movement. Concerned about the contribution of this return to center movement, Anderson et al. (2008) used a sequential saccade paradigm in which participants made a continuous series of saccades to peripheral targets that appeared to the left or right of the currently fixated location in a random sequence (the next eye movement began from the last target location). Examining the effects of previous saccades (n−x) on current saccade latency (n), they found that saccadic reaction times (RT) were reduced when the direction of the current saccade matched that of a preceding saccade (e.g., two left saccades), even when the two saccades in question were separated by multiple saccades in any direction. We examined if this pattern extends to conditions in which targets appear inside continuously marked locations that provide stable visual features (i.e., target “placeholders”) and when saccades are prompted by central arrows. Participants completed 3 conditions: peripheral targets (PT; continuous, sequential saccades to peripherally presented targets) without placeholders; PT with placeholders; and centrally presented arrows (CA; left or right pointing arrows at the currently fixated location instructing participants to saccade to the left or right). We found reduced saccadic RT when the immediately preceding saccade (n−1) was in the same (vs. opposite) direction in the PT without placeholders and CA conditions. This effect varied when considering the effect of the previous 2–5 (n−x) saccades on current saccade latency (n). The effects of previous eye movements on current saccade latency may be determined by multiple, time-varying mechanisms related to sensory (i.e., retinotopic location), motor (i.e., saccade direction), and environmental (i.e., persistent visual objects) factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4211295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42112952014-11-11 Directional interactions between current and prior saccades Jones, Stephanie A. H. Cowper-Smith, Christopher D. Westwood, David A. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience One way to explore how prior sensory and motor events impact eye movements is to ask someone to look to targets located about a central point, returning gaze to the central point after each eye movement. Concerned about the contribution of this return to center movement, Anderson et al. (2008) used a sequential saccade paradigm in which participants made a continuous series of saccades to peripheral targets that appeared to the left or right of the currently fixated location in a random sequence (the next eye movement began from the last target location). Examining the effects of previous saccades (n−x) on current saccade latency (n), they found that saccadic reaction times (RT) were reduced when the direction of the current saccade matched that of a preceding saccade (e.g., two left saccades), even when the two saccades in question were separated by multiple saccades in any direction. We examined if this pattern extends to conditions in which targets appear inside continuously marked locations that provide stable visual features (i.e., target “placeholders”) and when saccades are prompted by central arrows. Participants completed 3 conditions: peripheral targets (PT; continuous, sequential saccades to peripherally presented targets) without placeholders; PT with placeholders; and centrally presented arrows (CA; left or right pointing arrows at the currently fixated location instructing participants to saccade to the left or right). We found reduced saccadic RT when the immediately preceding saccade (n−1) was in the same (vs. opposite) direction in the PT without placeholders and CA conditions. This effect varied when considering the effect of the previous 2–5 (n−x) saccades on current saccade latency (n). The effects of previous eye movements on current saccade latency may be determined by multiple, time-varying mechanisms related to sensory (i.e., retinotopic location), motor (i.e., saccade direction), and environmental (i.e., persistent visual objects) factors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4211295/ /pubmed/25389401 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00872 Text en Copyright © 2014 Jones, Cowper-Smith and Westwood. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Jones, Stephanie A. H.
Cowper-Smith, Christopher D.
Westwood, David A.
Directional interactions between current and prior saccades
title Directional interactions between current and prior saccades
title_full Directional interactions between current and prior saccades
title_fullStr Directional interactions between current and prior saccades
title_full_unstemmed Directional interactions between current and prior saccades
title_short Directional interactions between current and prior saccades
title_sort directional interactions between current and prior saccades
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25389401
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00872
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesstephanieah directionalinteractionsbetweencurrentandpriorsaccades
AT cowpersmithchristopherd directionalinteractionsbetweencurrentandpriorsaccades
AT westwooddavida directionalinteractionsbetweencurrentandpriorsaccades