Cargando…

Trap Array Configuration Influences Estimates and Precision of Black Bear Density and Abundance

Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models have advanced our ability to estimate population density for wide ranging animals by explicitly incorporating individual movement. Though these models are more robust to various spatial sampling designs, few studies have empirically tested different large-scale...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilton, Clay M., Puckett, Emily E., Beringer, Jeff, Gardner, Beth, Eggert, Lori S., Belant, Jerrold L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25350557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111257
_version_ 1782341622423355392
author Wilton, Clay M.
Puckett, Emily E.
Beringer, Jeff
Gardner, Beth
Eggert, Lori S.
Belant, Jerrold L.
author_facet Wilton, Clay M.
Puckett, Emily E.
Beringer, Jeff
Gardner, Beth
Eggert, Lori S.
Belant, Jerrold L.
author_sort Wilton, Clay M.
collection PubMed
description Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models have advanced our ability to estimate population density for wide ranging animals by explicitly incorporating individual movement. Though these models are more robust to various spatial sampling designs, few studies have empirically tested different large-scale trap configurations using SCR models. We investigated how extent of trap coverage and trap spacing affects precision and accuracy of SCR parameters, implementing models using the R package secr. We tested two trapping scenarios, one spatially extensive and one intensive, using black bear (Ursus americanus) DNA data from hair snare arrays in south-central Missouri, USA. We also examined the influence that adding a second, lower barbed-wire strand to snares had on quantity and spatial distribution of detections. We simulated trapping data to test bias in density estimates of each configuration under a range of density and detection parameter values. Field data showed that using multiple arrays with intensive snare coverage produced more detections of more individuals than extensive coverage. Consequently, density and detection parameters were more precise for the intensive design. Density was estimated as 1.7 bears per 100 km(2) and was 5.5 times greater than that under extensive sampling. Abundance was 279 (95% CI = 193–406) bears in the 16,812 km(2) study area. Excluding detections from the lower strand resulted in the loss of 35 detections, 14 unique bears, and the largest recorded movement between snares. All simulations showed low bias for density under both configurations. Results demonstrated that in low density populations with non-uniform distribution of population density, optimizing the tradeoff among snare spacing, coverage, and sample size is of critical importance to estimating parameters with high precision and accuracy. With limited resources, allocating available traps to multiple arrays with intensive trap spacing increased the amount of information needed to inform parameters with high precision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4211732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42117322014-11-05 Trap Array Configuration Influences Estimates and Precision of Black Bear Density and Abundance Wilton, Clay M. Puckett, Emily E. Beringer, Jeff Gardner, Beth Eggert, Lori S. Belant, Jerrold L. PLoS One Research Article Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models have advanced our ability to estimate population density for wide ranging animals by explicitly incorporating individual movement. Though these models are more robust to various spatial sampling designs, few studies have empirically tested different large-scale trap configurations using SCR models. We investigated how extent of trap coverage and trap spacing affects precision and accuracy of SCR parameters, implementing models using the R package secr. We tested two trapping scenarios, one spatially extensive and one intensive, using black bear (Ursus americanus) DNA data from hair snare arrays in south-central Missouri, USA. We also examined the influence that adding a second, lower barbed-wire strand to snares had on quantity and spatial distribution of detections. We simulated trapping data to test bias in density estimates of each configuration under a range of density and detection parameter values. Field data showed that using multiple arrays with intensive snare coverage produced more detections of more individuals than extensive coverage. Consequently, density and detection parameters were more precise for the intensive design. Density was estimated as 1.7 bears per 100 km(2) and was 5.5 times greater than that under extensive sampling. Abundance was 279 (95% CI = 193–406) bears in the 16,812 km(2) study area. Excluding detections from the lower strand resulted in the loss of 35 detections, 14 unique bears, and the largest recorded movement between snares. All simulations showed low bias for density under both configurations. Results demonstrated that in low density populations with non-uniform distribution of population density, optimizing the tradeoff among snare spacing, coverage, and sample size is of critical importance to estimating parameters with high precision and accuracy. With limited resources, allocating available traps to multiple arrays with intensive trap spacing increased the amount of information needed to inform parameters with high precision. Public Library of Science 2014-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4211732/ /pubmed/25350557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111257 Text en © 2014 Wilton et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilton, Clay M.
Puckett, Emily E.
Beringer, Jeff
Gardner, Beth
Eggert, Lori S.
Belant, Jerrold L.
Trap Array Configuration Influences Estimates and Precision of Black Bear Density and Abundance
title Trap Array Configuration Influences Estimates and Precision of Black Bear Density and Abundance
title_full Trap Array Configuration Influences Estimates and Precision of Black Bear Density and Abundance
title_fullStr Trap Array Configuration Influences Estimates and Precision of Black Bear Density and Abundance
title_full_unstemmed Trap Array Configuration Influences Estimates and Precision of Black Bear Density and Abundance
title_short Trap Array Configuration Influences Estimates and Precision of Black Bear Density and Abundance
title_sort trap array configuration influences estimates and precision of black bear density and abundance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4211732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25350557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111257
work_keys_str_mv AT wiltonclaym traparrayconfigurationinfluencesestimatesandprecisionofblackbeardensityandabundance
AT puckettemilye traparrayconfigurationinfluencesestimatesandprecisionofblackbeardensityandabundance
AT beringerjeff traparrayconfigurationinfluencesestimatesandprecisionofblackbeardensityandabundance
AT gardnerbeth traparrayconfigurationinfluencesestimatesandprecisionofblackbeardensityandabundance
AT eggertloris traparrayconfigurationinfluencesestimatesandprecisionofblackbeardensityandabundance
AT belantjerroldl traparrayconfigurationinfluencesestimatesandprecisionofblackbeardensityandabundance