Cargando…

Liver Safety Assessment in Special Populations (Hepatitis B, C, and Oncology Trials)

The FDA guidance for industry in the premarketing clinical evaluation of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the most specific regulatory guidance currently available and has been useful in setting standards for the great majority of clinical indications involving subjects with a low risk of liver d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A., Merz, Michael, Griffel, Louis, Kaplowitz, Neil, Watkins, Paul B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0186-3
_version_ 1782341661710352384
author Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A.
Merz, Michael
Griffel, Louis
Kaplowitz, Neil
Watkins, Paul B.
author_facet Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A.
Merz, Michael
Griffel, Louis
Kaplowitz, Neil
Watkins, Paul B.
author_sort Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A.
collection PubMed
description The FDA guidance for industry in the premarketing clinical evaluation of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the most specific regulatory guidance currently available and has been useful in setting standards for the great majority of clinical indications involving subjects with a low risk of liver disorders. However, liver safety assessment faces challenges in populations with underlying liver disease, such as viral hepatitis or metastatic cancer. This is an important issue because there are currently many promising anti-viral and oncologic therapies in clinical development, with a trend toward oral therapies with reduced side effects. Without clearer guidelines, questions regarding liver safety may become a major factor in regulatory approval and ultimately physician uptake of the new treatments. The lack of consensus in defining stopping rules based on serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels underscores the need for precompetitive data sharing to improve our understanding of DILI in these populations and to allow evidence-based rather than empirical definition of stopping rules. A workshop was convened to discuss best practices for the assessment of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4212149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42121492014-11-05 Liver Safety Assessment in Special Populations (Hepatitis B, C, and Oncology Trials) Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A. Merz, Michael Griffel, Louis Kaplowitz, Neil Watkins, Paul B. Drug Saf Review Article The FDA guidance for industry in the premarketing clinical evaluation of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the most specific regulatory guidance currently available and has been useful in setting standards for the great majority of clinical indications involving subjects with a low risk of liver disorders. However, liver safety assessment faces challenges in populations with underlying liver disease, such as viral hepatitis or metastatic cancer. This is an important issue because there are currently many promising anti-viral and oncologic therapies in clinical development, with a trend toward oral therapies with reduced side effects. Without clearer guidelines, questions regarding liver safety may become a major factor in regulatory approval and ultimately physician uptake of the new treatments. The lack of consensus in defining stopping rules based on serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels underscores the need for precompetitive data sharing to improve our understanding of DILI in these populations and to allow evidence-based rather than empirical definition of stopping rules. A workshop was convened to discuss best practices for the assessment of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in clinical trials. Springer International Publishing 2014-10-29 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4212149/ /pubmed/25352328 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0186-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A.
Merz, Michael
Griffel, Louis
Kaplowitz, Neil
Watkins, Paul B.
Liver Safety Assessment in Special Populations (Hepatitis B, C, and Oncology Trials)
title Liver Safety Assessment in Special Populations (Hepatitis B, C, and Oncology Trials)
title_full Liver Safety Assessment in Special Populations (Hepatitis B, C, and Oncology Trials)
title_fullStr Liver Safety Assessment in Special Populations (Hepatitis B, C, and Oncology Trials)
title_full_unstemmed Liver Safety Assessment in Special Populations (Hepatitis B, C, and Oncology Trials)
title_short Liver Safety Assessment in Special Populations (Hepatitis B, C, and Oncology Trials)
title_sort liver safety assessment in special populations (hepatitis b, c, and oncology trials)
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352328
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0186-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kullakublickgerda liversafetyassessmentinspecialpopulationshepatitisbcandoncologytrials
AT merzmichael liversafetyassessmentinspecialpopulationshepatitisbcandoncologytrials
AT griffellouis liversafetyassessmentinspecialpopulationshepatitisbcandoncologytrials
AT kaplowitzneil liversafetyassessmentinspecialpopulationshepatitisbcandoncologytrials
AT watkinspaulb liversafetyassessmentinspecialpopulationshepatitisbcandoncologytrials