Cargando…

Methodology to Assess Clinical Liver Safety Data

Analysis of liver safety data has to be multivariate by nature and needs to take into account time dependency of observations. Current standard tools for liver safety assessment such as summary tables, individual data listings, and narratives address these requirements to a limited extent only. Usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merz, Michael, Lee, Kwan R., Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A., Brueckner, Andreas, Watkins, Paul B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0184-5
_version_ 1782341663395414016
author Merz, Michael
Lee, Kwan R.
Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A.
Brueckner, Andreas
Watkins, Paul B.
author_facet Merz, Michael
Lee, Kwan R.
Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A.
Brueckner, Andreas
Watkins, Paul B.
author_sort Merz, Michael
collection PubMed
description Analysis of liver safety data has to be multivariate by nature and needs to take into account time dependency of observations. Current standard tools for liver safety assessment such as summary tables, individual data listings, and narratives address these requirements to a limited extent only. Using graphics in the context of a systematic workflow including predefined graph templates is a valuable addition to standard instruments, helping to ensure completeness of evaluation, and supporting both hypothesis generation and testing. Employing graphical workflows interactively allows analysis in a team-based setting and facilitates identification of the most suitable graphics for publishing and regulatory reporting. Another important tool is statistical outlier detection, accounting for the fact that for assessment of Drug-Induced Liver Injury, identification and thorough evaluation of extreme values has much more relevance than measures of central tendency in the data. Taken together, systematical graphical data exploration and statistical outlier detection may have the potential to significantly improve assessment and interpretation of clinical liver safety data. A workshop was convened to discuss best practices for the assessment of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in clinical trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4212156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42121562014-11-05 Methodology to Assess Clinical Liver Safety Data Merz, Michael Lee, Kwan R. Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A. Brueckner, Andreas Watkins, Paul B. Drug Saf Review Article Analysis of liver safety data has to be multivariate by nature and needs to take into account time dependency of observations. Current standard tools for liver safety assessment such as summary tables, individual data listings, and narratives address these requirements to a limited extent only. Using graphics in the context of a systematic workflow including predefined graph templates is a valuable addition to standard instruments, helping to ensure completeness of evaluation, and supporting both hypothesis generation and testing. Employing graphical workflows interactively allows analysis in a team-based setting and facilitates identification of the most suitable graphics for publishing and regulatory reporting. Another important tool is statistical outlier detection, accounting for the fact that for assessment of Drug-Induced Liver Injury, identification and thorough evaluation of extreme values has much more relevance than measures of central tendency in the data. Taken together, systematical graphical data exploration and statistical outlier detection may have the potential to significantly improve assessment and interpretation of clinical liver safety data. A workshop was convened to discuss best practices for the assessment of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in clinical trials. Springer International Publishing 2014-10-29 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4212156/ /pubmed/25352326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0184-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Merz, Michael
Lee, Kwan R.
Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A.
Brueckner, Andreas
Watkins, Paul B.
Methodology to Assess Clinical Liver Safety Data
title Methodology to Assess Clinical Liver Safety Data
title_full Methodology to Assess Clinical Liver Safety Data
title_fullStr Methodology to Assess Clinical Liver Safety Data
title_full_unstemmed Methodology to Assess Clinical Liver Safety Data
title_short Methodology to Assess Clinical Liver Safety Data
title_sort methodology to assess clinical liver safety data
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25352326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0184-5
work_keys_str_mv AT merzmichael methodologytoassessclinicalliversafetydata
AT leekwanr methodologytoassessclinicalliversafetydata
AT kullakublickgerda methodologytoassessclinicalliversafetydata
AT bruecknerandreas methodologytoassessclinicalliversafetydata
AT watkinspaulb methodologytoassessclinicalliversafetydata