Cargando…
Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children
Aim: The present study was taken up to clinically evaluate and compare effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) and comfort control syringe (CCS) in various pediatric dental procedures as an alternative to the conventional method of local anesthesia (LA) administration. Mat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25356003 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1240 |
_version_ | 1782341664082231296 |
---|---|
author | Bansal, Neha Saha, Sonali Jaiswal, JN Samadi, Firoza |
author_facet | Bansal, Neha Saha, Sonali Jaiswal, JN Samadi, Firoza |
author_sort | Bansal, Neha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: The present study was taken up to clinically evaluate and compare effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) and comfort control syringe (CCS) in various pediatric dental procedures as an alternative to the conventional method of local anesthesia (LA) administration. Materials and methods: Ninety healthy children having at least one deciduous molar tooth indicated for extraction in either maxillary right or left quadrant in age group of 6 to 10 years were randomly divided into three equal groups having 30 subjects each. Group I: LA administration using conventional syringe, group II: LA administration using TENS along with the conventional syringe, group III: LA administration using CCS. After LA by the three techniques, pain, anxiety and heart rate were measured. Statistical analysis: The observations, thus, obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA), student t-test and paired t-test. Results: The mean pain score was maximum in group I followed by group II, while group III revealed the minimum pain, where LA was administered using CCS. Mean anxiety score was maximum in group I followed by group II, while group III revealed the minimum score. Mean heart rate was maximum in group I followed in descending order by groups II and III. Conclusion: The study supports the belief that CCS could be a viable alternative in comparison to the other two methods of LA delivery in children. How to cite this article: Bansal N, Saha S, Jaiswal JN, Samadi F. Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(2):71-76. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4212160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42121602014-10-29 Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children Bansal, Neha Saha, Sonali Jaiswal, JN Samadi, Firoza Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article Aim: The present study was taken up to clinically evaluate and compare effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) and comfort control syringe (CCS) in various pediatric dental procedures as an alternative to the conventional method of local anesthesia (LA) administration. Materials and methods: Ninety healthy children having at least one deciduous molar tooth indicated for extraction in either maxillary right or left quadrant in age group of 6 to 10 years were randomly divided into three equal groups having 30 subjects each. Group I: LA administration using conventional syringe, group II: LA administration using TENS along with the conventional syringe, group III: LA administration using CCS. After LA by the three techniques, pain, anxiety and heart rate were measured. Statistical analysis: The observations, thus, obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA), student t-test and paired t-test. Results: The mean pain score was maximum in group I followed by group II, while group III revealed the minimum pain, where LA was administered using CCS. Mean anxiety score was maximum in group I followed by group II, while group III revealed the minimum score. Mean heart rate was maximum in group I followed in descending order by groups II and III. Conclusion: The study supports the belief that CCS could be a viable alternative in comparison to the other two methods of LA delivery in children. How to cite this article: Bansal N, Saha S, Jaiswal JN, Samadi F. Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(2):71-76. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2014 2014-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4212160/ /pubmed/25356003 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1240 Text en Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bansal, Neha Saha, Sonali Jaiswal, JN Samadi, Firoza Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children |
title | Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children |
title_full | Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children |
title_fullStr | Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children |
title_full_unstemmed | Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children |
title_short | Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children |
title_sort | pain elimination during injection with newer electronic devices: a comparative evaluation in children |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25356003 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bansalneha paineliminationduringinjectionwithnewerelectronicdevicesacomparativeevaluationinchildren AT sahasonali paineliminationduringinjectionwithnewerelectronicdevicesacomparativeevaluationinchildren AT jaiswaljn paineliminationduringinjectionwithnewerelectronicdevicesacomparativeevaluationinchildren AT samadifiroza paineliminationduringinjectionwithnewerelectronicdevicesacomparativeevaluationinchildren |