Cargando…

Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children

Aim: The present study was taken up to clinically evaluate and compare effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) and comfort control syringe (CCS) in various pediatric dental procedures as an alternative to the conventional method of local anesthesia (LA) administration. Mat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bansal, Neha, Saha, Sonali, Jaiswal, JN, Samadi, Firoza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25356003
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1240
_version_ 1782341664082231296
author Bansal, Neha
Saha, Sonali
Jaiswal, JN
Samadi, Firoza
author_facet Bansal, Neha
Saha, Sonali
Jaiswal, JN
Samadi, Firoza
author_sort Bansal, Neha
collection PubMed
description Aim: The present study was taken up to clinically evaluate and compare effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) and comfort control syringe (CCS) in various pediatric dental procedures as an alternative to the conventional method of local anesthesia (LA) administration. Materials and methods: Ninety healthy children having at least one deciduous molar tooth indicated for extraction in either maxillary right or left quadrant in age group of 6 to 10 years were randomly divided into three equal groups having 30 subjects each. Group I: LA administration using conventional syringe, group II: LA administration using TENS along with the conventional syringe, group III: LA administration using CCS. After LA by the three techniques, pain, anxiety and heart rate were measured. Statistical analysis: The observations, thus, obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA), student t-test and paired t-test. Results: The mean pain score was maximum in group I followed by group II, while group III revealed the minimum pain, where LA was administered using CCS. Mean anxiety score was maximum in group I followed by group II, while group III revealed the minimum score. Mean heart rate was maximum in group I followed in descending order by groups II and III. Conclusion: The study supports the belief that CCS could be a viable alternative in comparison to the other two methods of LA delivery in children. How to cite this article: Bansal N, Saha S, Jaiswal JN, Samadi F. Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(2):71-76.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4212160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42121602014-10-29 Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children Bansal, Neha Saha, Sonali Jaiswal, JN Samadi, Firoza Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article Aim: The present study was taken up to clinically evaluate and compare effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator (TENS) and comfort control syringe (CCS) in various pediatric dental procedures as an alternative to the conventional method of local anesthesia (LA) administration. Materials and methods: Ninety healthy children having at least one deciduous molar tooth indicated for extraction in either maxillary right or left quadrant in age group of 6 to 10 years were randomly divided into three equal groups having 30 subjects each. Group I: LA administration using conventional syringe, group II: LA administration using TENS along with the conventional syringe, group III: LA administration using CCS. After LA by the three techniques, pain, anxiety and heart rate were measured. Statistical analysis: The observations, thus, obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA), student t-test and paired t-test. Results: The mean pain score was maximum in group I followed by group II, while group III revealed the minimum pain, where LA was administered using CCS. Mean anxiety score was maximum in group I followed by group II, while group III revealed the minimum score. Mean heart rate was maximum in group I followed in descending order by groups II and III. Conclusion: The study supports the belief that CCS could be a viable alternative in comparison to the other two methods of LA delivery in children. How to cite this article: Bansal N, Saha S, Jaiswal JN, Samadi F. Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(2):71-76. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2014 2014-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4212160/ /pubmed/25356003 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1240 Text en Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Bansal, Neha
Saha, Sonali
Jaiswal, JN
Samadi, Firoza
Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children
title Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children
title_full Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children
title_fullStr Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children
title_full_unstemmed Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children
title_short Pain Elimination during Injection with Newer Electronic Devices: A Comparative Evaluation in Children
title_sort pain elimination during injection with newer electronic devices: a comparative evaluation in children
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25356003
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1240
work_keys_str_mv AT bansalneha paineliminationduringinjectionwithnewerelectronicdevicesacomparativeevaluationinchildren
AT sahasonali paineliminationduringinjectionwithnewerelectronicdevicesacomparativeevaluationinchildren
AT jaiswaljn paineliminationduringinjectionwithnewerelectronicdevicesacomparativeevaluationinchildren
AT samadifiroza paineliminationduringinjectionwithnewerelectronicdevicesacomparativeevaluationinchildren