Cargando…

Performance of the Medtronic Sentrino continuous glucose management (CGM) system in the cardiac intensive care unit

BACKGROUND: Maintaining glucose in the target range, while avoiding hypoglycemia, is challenging in critically ill patients. We investigated the performance and safety of Medtronic Sentrino, a newly developed continuous glucose management (CGM) system for critically ill adults. METHODS: This was a p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kosiborod, Mikhail, Gottlieb, Rebecca K, Sekella, Julie A, Peterman, Diane, Grodzinsky, Anna, Kennedy, Paul, Borkon, Michael A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25452874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000037
_version_ 1782341715863011328
author Kosiborod, Mikhail
Gottlieb, Rebecca K
Sekella, Julie A
Peterman, Diane
Grodzinsky, Anna
Kennedy, Paul
Borkon, Michael A
author_facet Kosiborod, Mikhail
Gottlieb, Rebecca K
Sekella, Julie A
Peterman, Diane
Grodzinsky, Anna
Kennedy, Paul
Borkon, Michael A
author_sort Kosiborod, Mikhail
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maintaining glucose in the target range, while avoiding hypoglycemia, is challenging in critically ill patients. We investigated the performance and safety of Medtronic Sentrino, a newly developed continuous glucose management (CGM) system for critically ill adults. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm, open-label study in adult patients with cardiac ICU admission. Sentrino subcutaneous glucose sensors were inserted into patients’ thigh with planned study participation of 72 h. Sensor glucose results were displayed, and the system's alerts and alarms fully enabled. Reference blood glucose was collected from central venous catheter and analyzed with a blood gas analyzer. Treatment decisions were made independently of sensor glucose values, according to the existing standard of care. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were enrolled; all successfully completed the study. Sensor glucose values were displayed 96% of the time, and 870 paired blood glucose–sensor glucose points were analyzed. Overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 12.8% (95% CI 11.9% to 13.6%). No clinically significant differences in accuracy were seen within subgroups of hemodynamic status (MARD 12.3% and 13.1% for compromised vs stable hemodynamics). Consensus grid analysis showed >99% of sensor glucose values within A/B zones. No device or study-related adverse events were reported. 100% of clinicians found Sentrino easy to use after two patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our single-center experience, Sentrino CGM system demonstrated good accuracy and reliability, with no device-related adverse events in critically ill cardiac patients, and was easy to use and integrate in the cardiac ICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01763567.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4212554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42125542014-12-01 Performance of the Medtronic Sentrino continuous glucose management (CGM) system in the cardiac intensive care unit Kosiborod, Mikhail Gottlieb, Rebecca K Sekella, Julie A Peterman, Diane Grodzinsky, Anna Kennedy, Paul Borkon, Michael A BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Emerging Technologies and Therapeutics BACKGROUND: Maintaining glucose in the target range, while avoiding hypoglycemia, is challenging in critically ill patients. We investigated the performance and safety of Medtronic Sentrino, a newly developed continuous glucose management (CGM) system for critically ill adults. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm, open-label study in adult patients with cardiac ICU admission. Sentrino subcutaneous glucose sensors were inserted into patients’ thigh with planned study participation of 72 h. Sensor glucose results were displayed, and the system's alerts and alarms fully enabled. Reference blood glucose was collected from central venous catheter and analyzed with a blood gas analyzer. Treatment decisions were made independently of sensor glucose values, according to the existing standard of care. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were enrolled; all successfully completed the study. Sensor glucose values were displayed 96% of the time, and 870 paired blood glucose–sensor glucose points were analyzed. Overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 12.8% (95% CI 11.9% to 13.6%). No clinically significant differences in accuracy were seen within subgroups of hemodynamic status (MARD 12.3% and 13.1% for compromised vs stable hemodynamics). Consensus grid analysis showed >99% of sensor glucose values within A/B zones. No device or study-related adverse events were reported. 100% of clinicians found Sentrino easy to use after two patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our single-center experience, Sentrino CGM system demonstrated good accuracy and reliability, with no device-related adverse events in critically ill cardiac patients, and was easy to use and integrate in the cardiac ICU. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01763567. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4212554/ /pubmed/25452874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000037 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Emerging Technologies and Therapeutics
Kosiborod, Mikhail
Gottlieb, Rebecca K
Sekella, Julie A
Peterman, Diane
Grodzinsky, Anna
Kennedy, Paul
Borkon, Michael A
Performance of the Medtronic Sentrino continuous glucose management (CGM) system in the cardiac intensive care unit
title Performance of the Medtronic Sentrino continuous glucose management (CGM) system in the cardiac intensive care unit
title_full Performance of the Medtronic Sentrino continuous glucose management (CGM) system in the cardiac intensive care unit
title_fullStr Performance of the Medtronic Sentrino continuous glucose management (CGM) system in the cardiac intensive care unit
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the Medtronic Sentrino continuous glucose management (CGM) system in the cardiac intensive care unit
title_short Performance of the Medtronic Sentrino continuous glucose management (CGM) system in the cardiac intensive care unit
title_sort performance of the medtronic sentrino continuous glucose management (cgm) system in the cardiac intensive care unit
topic Emerging Technologies and Therapeutics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25452874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000037
work_keys_str_mv AT kosiborodmikhail performanceofthemedtronicsentrinocontinuousglucosemanagementcgmsysteminthecardiacintensivecareunit
AT gottliebrebeccak performanceofthemedtronicsentrinocontinuousglucosemanagementcgmsysteminthecardiacintensivecareunit
AT sekellajuliea performanceofthemedtronicsentrinocontinuousglucosemanagementcgmsysteminthecardiacintensivecareunit
AT petermandiane performanceofthemedtronicsentrinocontinuousglucosemanagementcgmsysteminthecardiacintensivecareunit
AT grodzinskyanna performanceofthemedtronicsentrinocontinuousglucosemanagementcgmsysteminthecardiacintensivecareunit
AT kennedypaul performanceofthemedtronicsentrinocontinuousglucosemanagementcgmsysteminthecardiacintensivecareunit
AT borkonmichaela performanceofthemedtronicsentrinocontinuousglucosemanagementcgmsysteminthecardiacintensivecareunit