Cargando…

L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature

Study Design Case report and review of the literature. Objective We present the case of a two-level lumbar spondylectomy at L4 and L5 for en bloc resection of a giant cell tumor (GCT) and lumbopelvic reconstruction. Methods A 58-year-old woman presented with a 7-month history of progressive intracta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santiago-Dieppa, David R., Hwang, Lee S., Bydon, Ali, Gokaslan, Ziya L., McCarthy, Edward F., Witham, Timothy F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25364329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1387804
_version_ 1782341743194144768
author Santiago-Dieppa, David R.
Hwang, Lee S.
Bydon, Ali
Gokaslan, Ziya L.
McCarthy, Edward F.
Witham, Timothy F.
author_facet Santiago-Dieppa, David R.
Hwang, Lee S.
Bydon, Ali
Gokaslan, Ziya L.
McCarthy, Edward F.
Witham, Timothy F.
author_sort Santiago-Dieppa, David R.
collection PubMed
description Study Design Case report and review of the literature. Objective We present the case of a two-level lumbar spondylectomy at L4 and L5 for en bloc resection of a giant cell tumor (GCT) and lumbopelvic reconstruction. Methods A 58-year-old woman presented with a 7-month history of progressive intractable back and leg pain secondary to a biopsy-proven Enneking stage III GCT of the L4 and L5 vertebrae. The patient underwent a successful L4–L5 spondylectomy and lumbopelvic reconstruction using a combined posterior and anterior approach over two operative stages. Results Postoperative complications included a deep wound infection and a cerebrospinal fluid leak; however, following surgical debridement and long-term antibiotic treatment, the patient was neurologically intact with minimal pain and there was no evidence of tumor recurrence or instrumentation failure at more than 2 years of follow-up. Conclusion Spondylectomy that achieves en bloc resection is a viable and effective treatment option that can be curative for Enneking stage III GCTs involving the lower lumbar spine. The lumbosacral junction represents a challenging anatomic location for spinal reconstruction after spondylectomy with unique technical considerations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4212699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42126992015-10-01 L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature Santiago-Dieppa, David R. Hwang, Lee S. Bydon, Ali Gokaslan, Ziya L. McCarthy, Edward F. Witham, Timothy F. Evid Based Spine Care J Article Study Design Case report and review of the literature. Objective We present the case of a two-level lumbar spondylectomy at L4 and L5 for en bloc resection of a giant cell tumor (GCT) and lumbopelvic reconstruction. Methods A 58-year-old woman presented with a 7-month history of progressive intractable back and leg pain secondary to a biopsy-proven Enneking stage III GCT of the L4 and L5 vertebrae. The patient underwent a successful L4–L5 spondylectomy and lumbopelvic reconstruction using a combined posterior and anterior approach over two operative stages. Results Postoperative complications included a deep wound infection and a cerebrospinal fluid leak; however, following surgical debridement and long-term antibiotic treatment, the patient was neurologically intact with minimal pain and there was no evidence of tumor recurrence or instrumentation failure at more than 2 years of follow-up. Conclusion Spondylectomy that achieves en bloc resection is a viable and effective treatment option that can be curative for Enneking stage III GCTs involving the lower lumbar spine. The lumbosacral junction represents a challenging anatomic location for spinal reconstruction after spondylectomy with unique technical considerations. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2014-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4212699/ /pubmed/25364329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1387804 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Santiago-Dieppa, David R.
Hwang, Lee S.
Bydon, Ali
Gokaslan, Ziya L.
McCarthy, Edward F.
Witham, Timothy F.
L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature
title L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature
title_full L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature
title_fullStr L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature
title_short L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature
title_sort l4 and l5 spondylectomy for en bloc resection of giant cell tumor and review of the literature
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25364329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1387804
work_keys_str_mv AT santiagodieppadavidr l4andl5spondylectomyforenblocresectionofgiantcelltumorandreviewoftheliterature
AT hwanglees l4andl5spondylectomyforenblocresectionofgiantcelltumorandreviewoftheliterature
AT bydonali l4andl5spondylectomyforenblocresectionofgiantcelltumorandreviewoftheliterature
AT gokaslanziyal l4andl5spondylectomyforenblocresectionofgiantcelltumorandreviewoftheliterature
AT mccarthyedwardf l4andl5spondylectomyforenblocresectionofgiantcelltumorandreviewoftheliterature
AT withamtimothyf l4andl5spondylectomyforenblocresectionofgiantcelltumorandreviewoftheliterature