Cargando…
L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature
Study Design Case report and review of the literature. Objective We present the case of a two-level lumbar spondylectomy at L4 and L5 for en bloc resection of a giant cell tumor (GCT) and lumbopelvic reconstruction. Methods A 58-year-old woman presented with a 7-month history of progressive intracta...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25364329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1387804 |
_version_ | 1782341743194144768 |
---|---|
author | Santiago-Dieppa, David R. Hwang, Lee S. Bydon, Ali Gokaslan, Ziya L. McCarthy, Edward F. Witham, Timothy F. |
author_facet | Santiago-Dieppa, David R. Hwang, Lee S. Bydon, Ali Gokaslan, Ziya L. McCarthy, Edward F. Witham, Timothy F. |
author_sort | Santiago-Dieppa, David R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Study Design Case report and review of the literature. Objective We present the case of a two-level lumbar spondylectomy at L4 and L5 for en bloc resection of a giant cell tumor (GCT) and lumbopelvic reconstruction. Methods A 58-year-old woman presented with a 7-month history of progressive intractable back and leg pain secondary to a biopsy-proven Enneking stage III GCT of the L4 and L5 vertebrae. The patient underwent a successful L4–L5 spondylectomy and lumbopelvic reconstruction using a combined posterior and anterior approach over two operative stages. Results Postoperative complications included a deep wound infection and a cerebrospinal fluid leak; however, following surgical debridement and long-term antibiotic treatment, the patient was neurologically intact with minimal pain and there was no evidence of tumor recurrence or instrumentation failure at more than 2 years of follow-up. Conclusion Spondylectomy that achieves en bloc resection is a viable and effective treatment option that can be curative for Enneking stage III GCTs involving the lower lumbar spine. The lumbosacral junction represents a challenging anatomic location for spinal reconstruction after spondylectomy with unique technical considerations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4212699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42126992015-10-01 L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature Santiago-Dieppa, David R. Hwang, Lee S. Bydon, Ali Gokaslan, Ziya L. McCarthy, Edward F. Witham, Timothy F. Evid Based Spine Care J Article Study Design Case report and review of the literature. Objective We present the case of a two-level lumbar spondylectomy at L4 and L5 for en bloc resection of a giant cell tumor (GCT) and lumbopelvic reconstruction. Methods A 58-year-old woman presented with a 7-month history of progressive intractable back and leg pain secondary to a biopsy-proven Enneking stage III GCT of the L4 and L5 vertebrae. The patient underwent a successful L4–L5 spondylectomy and lumbopelvic reconstruction using a combined posterior and anterior approach over two operative stages. Results Postoperative complications included a deep wound infection and a cerebrospinal fluid leak; however, following surgical debridement and long-term antibiotic treatment, the patient was neurologically intact with minimal pain and there was no evidence of tumor recurrence or instrumentation failure at more than 2 years of follow-up. Conclusion Spondylectomy that achieves en bloc resection is a viable and effective treatment option that can be curative for Enneking stage III GCTs involving the lower lumbar spine. The lumbosacral junction represents a challenging anatomic location for spinal reconstruction after spondylectomy with unique technical considerations. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2014-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4212699/ /pubmed/25364329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1387804 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Article Santiago-Dieppa, David R. Hwang, Lee S. Bydon, Ali Gokaslan, Ziya L. McCarthy, Edward F. Witham, Timothy F. L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature |
title | L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature |
title_full | L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature |
title_fullStr | L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature |
title_short | L4 and L5 Spondylectomy for En Bloc Resection of Giant Cell Tumor and Review of the Literature |
title_sort | l4 and l5 spondylectomy for en bloc resection of giant cell tumor and review of the literature |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25364329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1387804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santiagodieppadavidr l4andl5spondylectomyforenblocresectionofgiantcelltumorandreviewoftheliterature AT hwanglees l4andl5spondylectomyforenblocresectionofgiantcelltumorandreviewoftheliterature AT bydonali l4andl5spondylectomyforenblocresectionofgiantcelltumorandreviewoftheliterature AT gokaslanziyal l4andl5spondylectomyforenblocresectionofgiantcelltumorandreviewoftheliterature AT mccarthyedwardf l4andl5spondylectomyforenblocresectionofgiantcelltumorandreviewoftheliterature AT withamtimothyf l4andl5spondylectomyforenblocresectionofgiantcelltumorandreviewoftheliterature |