Cargando…

Physically Transient Photonics: Random versus Distributed Feedback Lasing Based on Nanoimprinted DNA

[Image: see text] Room-temperature nanoimprinted, DNA-based distributed feedback (DFB) laser operation at 605 nm is reported. The laser is made of a pure DNA host matrix doped with gain dyes. At high excitation densities, the emission of the untextured dye-doped DNA films is characterized by a broad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camposeo, Andrea, Del Carro, Pompilio, Persano, Luana, Cyprych, Konrad, Szukalski, Adam, Sznitko, Lech, Mysliwiec, Jaroslaw, Pisignano, Dario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25265371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn504720b
_version_ 1782341751745282048
author Camposeo, Andrea
Del Carro, Pompilio
Persano, Luana
Cyprych, Konrad
Szukalski, Adam
Sznitko, Lech
Mysliwiec, Jaroslaw
Pisignano, Dario
author_facet Camposeo, Andrea
Del Carro, Pompilio
Persano, Luana
Cyprych, Konrad
Szukalski, Adam
Sznitko, Lech
Mysliwiec, Jaroslaw
Pisignano, Dario
author_sort Camposeo, Andrea
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Room-temperature nanoimprinted, DNA-based distributed feedback (DFB) laser operation at 605 nm is reported. The laser is made of a pure DNA host matrix doped with gain dyes. At high excitation densities, the emission of the untextured dye-doped DNA films is characterized by a broad emission peak with an overall line width of 12 nm and superimposed narrow peaks, characteristic of random lasing. Moreover, direct patterning of the DNA films is demonstrated with a resolution down to 100 nm, enabling the realization of both surface-emitting and edge-emitting DFB lasers with a typical line width of <0.3 nm. The resulting emission is polarized, with a ratio between the TE- and TM-polarized intensities exceeding 30. In addition, the nanopatterned devices dissolve in water within less than 2 min. These results demonstrate the possibility of realizing various physically transient nanophotonics and laser architectures, including random lasing and nanoimprinted devices, based on natural biopolymers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4212788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42127882014-11-05 Physically Transient Photonics: Random versus Distributed Feedback Lasing Based on Nanoimprinted DNA Camposeo, Andrea Del Carro, Pompilio Persano, Luana Cyprych, Konrad Szukalski, Adam Sznitko, Lech Mysliwiec, Jaroslaw Pisignano, Dario ACS Nano [Image: see text] Room-temperature nanoimprinted, DNA-based distributed feedback (DFB) laser operation at 605 nm is reported. The laser is made of a pure DNA host matrix doped with gain dyes. At high excitation densities, the emission of the untextured dye-doped DNA films is characterized by a broad emission peak with an overall line width of 12 nm and superimposed narrow peaks, characteristic of random lasing. Moreover, direct patterning of the DNA films is demonstrated with a resolution down to 100 nm, enabling the realization of both surface-emitting and edge-emitting DFB lasers with a typical line width of <0.3 nm. The resulting emission is polarized, with a ratio between the TE- and TM-polarized intensities exceeding 30. In addition, the nanopatterned devices dissolve in water within less than 2 min. These results demonstrate the possibility of realizing various physically transient nanophotonics and laser architectures, including random lasing and nanoimprinted devices, based on natural biopolymers. American Chemical Society 2014-09-29 2014-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4212788/ /pubmed/25265371 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn504720b Text en Copyright © 2014 American Chemical Society Terms of Use (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html)
spellingShingle Camposeo, Andrea
Del Carro, Pompilio
Persano, Luana
Cyprych, Konrad
Szukalski, Adam
Sznitko, Lech
Mysliwiec, Jaroslaw
Pisignano, Dario
Physically Transient Photonics: Random versus Distributed Feedback Lasing Based on Nanoimprinted DNA
title Physically Transient Photonics: Random versus Distributed Feedback Lasing Based on Nanoimprinted DNA
title_full Physically Transient Photonics: Random versus Distributed Feedback Lasing Based on Nanoimprinted DNA
title_fullStr Physically Transient Photonics: Random versus Distributed Feedback Lasing Based on Nanoimprinted DNA
title_full_unstemmed Physically Transient Photonics: Random versus Distributed Feedback Lasing Based on Nanoimprinted DNA
title_short Physically Transient Photonics: Random versus Distributed Feedback Lasing Based on Nanoimprinted DNA
title_sort physically transient photonics: random versus distributed feedback lasing based on nanoimprinted dna
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4212788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25265371
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn504720b
work_keys_str_mv AT camposeoandrea physicallytransientphotonicsrandomversusdistributedfeedbacklasingbasedonnanoimprinteddna
AT delcarropompilio physicallytransientphotonicsrandomversusdistributedfeedbacklasingbasedonnanoimprinteddna
AT persanoluana physicallytransientphotonicsrandomversusdistributedfeedbacklasingbasedonnanoimprinteddna
AT cyprychkonrad physicallytransientphotonicsrandomversusdistributedfeedbacklasingbasedonnanoimprinteddna
AT szukalskiadam physicallytransientphotonicsrandomversusdistributedfeedbacklasingbasedonnanoimprinteddna
AT sznitkolech physicallytransientphotonicsrandomversusdistributedfeedbacklasingbasedonnanoimprinteddna
AT mysliwiecjaroslaw physicallytransientphotonicsrandomversusdistributedfeedbacklasingbasedonnanoimprinteddna
AT pisignanodario physicallytransientphotonicsrandomversusdistributedfeedbacklasingbasedonnanoimprinteddna