Cargando…

A Comprehensive Comparison of Normalization Methods for Loading Control and Variance Stabilization of Reverse-Phase Protein Array Data

Loading control (LC) and variance stabilization of reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) data have been challenging mainly due to the small number of proteins in an experiment and the lack of reliable inherent control markers. In this study, we compare eight different normalization methods for LC and v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Wenbin, Ju, Zhenlin, Lu, Yiling, Mills, Gordon B, Akbani, Rehan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4213190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25374453
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S13329
_version_ 1782341797579587584
author Liu, Wenbin
Ju, Zhenlin
Lu, Yiling
Mills, Gordon B
Akbani, Rehan
author_facet Liu, Wenbin
Ju, Zhenlin
Lu, Yiling
Mills, Gordon B
Akbani, Rehan
author_sort Liu, Wenbin
collection PubMed
description Loading control (LC) and variance stabilization of reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) data have been challenging mainly due to the small number of proteins in an experiment and the lack of reliable inherent control markers. In this study, we compare eight different normalization methods for LC and variance stabilization. The invariant marker set concept was first applied to the normalization of high-throughput gene expression data. A set of “invariant” markers are selected to create a virtual reference sample. Then all the samples are normalized to the virtual reference. We propose a variant of this method in the context of RPPA data normalization and compare it with seven other normalization methods previously reported in the literature. The invariant marker set method performs well with respect to LC, variance stabilization and association with the immunohistochemistry/florescence in situ hybridization data for three key markers in breast tumor samples, while the other methods have inferior performance. The proposed method is a promising approach for improving the quality of RPPA data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4213190
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42131902014-11-05 A Comprehensive Comparison of Normalization Methods for Loading Control and Variance Stabilization of Reverse-Phase Protein Array Data Liu, Wenbin Ju, Zhenlin Lu, Yiling Mills, Gordon B Akbani, Rehan Cancer Inform Original Research Loading control (LC) and variance stabilization of reverse-phase protein array (RPPA) data have been challenging mainly due to the small number of proteins in an experiment and the lack of reliable inherent control markers. In this study, we compare eight different normalization methods for LC and variance stabilization. The invariant marker set concept was first applied to the normalization of high-throughput gene expression data. A set of “invariant” markers are selected to create a virtual reference sample. Then all the samples are normalized to the virtual reference. We propose a variant of this method in the context of RPPA data normalization and compare it with seven other normalization methods previously reported in the literature. The invariant marker set method performs well with respect to LC, variance stabilization and association with the immunohistochemistry/florescence in situ hybridization data for three key markers in breast tumor samples, while the other methods have inferior performance. The proposed method is a promising approach for improving the quality of RPPA data. Libertas Academica 2014-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4213190/ /pubmed/25374453 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S13329 Text en © 2014 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Liu, Wenbin
Ju, Zhenlin
Lu, Yiling
Mills, Gordon B
Akbani, Rehan
A Comprehensive Comparison of Normalization Methods for Loading Control and Variance Stabilization of Reverse-Phase Protein Array Data
title A Comprehensive Comparison of Normalization Methods for Loading Control and Variance Stabilization of Reverse-Phase Protein Array Data
title_full A Comprehensive Comparison of Normalization Methods for Loading Control and Variance Stabilization of Reverse-Phase Protein Array Data
title_fullStr A Comprehensive Comparison of Normalization Methods for Loading Control and Variance Stabilization of Reverse-Phase Protein Array Data
title_full_unstemmed A Comprehensive Comparison of Normalization Methods for Loading Control and Variance Stabilization of Reverse-Phase Protein Array Data
title_short A Comprehensive Comparison of Normalization Methods for Loading Control and Variance Stabilization of Reverse-Phase Protein Array Data
title_sort comprehensive comparison of normalization methods for loading control and variance stabilization of reverse-phase protein array data
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4213190/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25374453
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CIN.S13329
work_keys_str_mv AT liuwenbin acomprehensivecomparisonofnormalizationmethodsforloadingcontrolandvariancestabilizationofreversephaseproteinarraydata
AT juzhenlin acomprehensivecomparisonofnormalizationmethodsforloadingcontrolandvariancestabilizationofreversephaseproteinarraydata
AT luyiling acomprehensivecomparisonofnormalizationmethodsforloadingcontrolandvariancestabilizationofreversephaseproteinarraydata
AT millsgordonb acomprehensivecomparisonofnormalizationmethodsforloadingcontrolandvariancestabilizationofreversephaseproteinarraydata
AT akbanirehan acomprehensivecomparisonofnormalizationmethodsforloadingcontrolandvariancestabilizationofreversephaseproteinarraydata
AT liuwenbin comprehensivecomparisonofnormalizationmethodsforloadingcontrolandvariancestabilizationofreversephaseproteinarraydata
AT juzhenlin comprehensivecomparisonofnormalizationmethodsforloadingcontrolandvariancestabilizationofreversephaseproteinarraydata
AT luyiling comprehensivecomparisonofnormalizationmethodsforloadingcontrolandvariancestabilizationofreversephaseproteinarraydata
AT millsgordonb comprehensivecomparisonofnormalizationmethodsforloadingcontrolandvariancestabilizationofreversephaseproteinarraydata
AT akbanirehan comprehensivecomparisonofnormalizationmethodsforloadingcontrolandvariancestabilizationofreversephaseproteinarraydata