Cargando…

Comparison of Oven-drying Methods for Determination of Moisture Content in Feed Ingredients

An accurate assessment of moisture content in feed ingredients is important because moisture influences the nutritional evaluation of feedstuffs. The objective of this study was to evaluate various methods for moisture content determination. In Exp. 1, the weight loss on drying (LOD) of corn, soybea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahn, J. Y., Kil, D. Y., Kong, C., Kim, B. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4213707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25358322
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14305
_version_ 1782341857004486656
author Ahn, J. Y.
Kil, D. Y.
Kong, C.
Kim, B. G.
author_facet Ahn, J. Y.
Kil, D. Y.
Kong, C.
Kim, B. G.
author_sort Ahn, J. Y.
collection PubMed
description An accurate assessment of moisture content in feed ingredients is important because moisture influences the nutritional evaluation of feedstuffs. The objective of this study was to evaluate various methods for moisture content determination. In Exp. 1, the weight loss on drying (LOD) of corn, soybean meal (SBM), distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), whey permeate, whey powder, spray-dried porcine plasma (SDPP), fish meal, and a mixed diet of these 7 ingredients were measured by oven drying at 135°C for 2 h. Additionally, the samples were dried at 105°C for 3, 6, 9, 12, or 15 h. The LOD contents of the DDGS, whey permeate, and whey powder measured by drying at 135°C for 2 h were greater than the values measured by drying at 105°C for 3 h (p<0.05). All samples except SDPP (p = 0.70) dried at 105°C for 6, 9, 12, or 15 h caused more LOD compared with the samples dried for at 105°C for 3 h (p<0.05). The LOD contents of the individual ingredients were additive when dried at 105°C regardless of drying time. In Exp. 2, moisture contents of corn, SBM, wheat, whey permeate, whey powder, lactose, and 2 sources of DDGS (DDGS1 and DDGS2) were measured by the Karl Fischer method, oven drying at 135°C for 2 h, and oven drying at 125°C, 115°C, 105°C, or 95°C for increasing drying time from 1 to 24 h. Drying samples at 135°C for 2 h resulted in higher moisture content in whey permeate (7.5% vs 3.0%), whey powder (7.7% vs 3.8%), DDGS1 (11.4% vs 7.5%), and DDGS2 (13.1% vs 8.8%) compared with the Karl Fischer method (p<0.05). Whey permeate and whey powder were considerably darkened as the drying time increased. In conclusion, drying samples at 135°C for 2 h is not appropriate for determining the moisture content in whey permeate, whey powder, or DDGS as well as the mixed diet containing these ingredients. The oven-drying method at 105°C for 5 to 6 h appears to be appropriate for whey permeate and whey powder, and at 105°C for 2 to 3 h for DDGS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4213707
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42137072014-11-03 Comparison of Oven-drying Methods for Determination of Moisture Content in Feed Ingredients Ahn, J. Y. Kil, D. Y. Kong, C. Kim, B. G. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article An accurate assessment of moisture content in feed ingredients is important because moisture influences the nutritional evaluation of feedstuffs. The objective of this study was to evaluate various methods for moisture content determination. In Exp. 1, the weight loss on drying (LOD) of corn, soybean meal (SBM), distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), whey permeate, whey powder, spray-dried porcine plasma (SDPP), fish meal, and a mixed diet of these 7 ingredients were measured by oven drying at 135°C for 2 h. Additionally, the samples were dried at 105°C for 3, 6, 9, 12, or 15 h. The LOD contents of the DDGS, whey permeate, and whey powder measured by drying at 135°C for 2 h were greater than the values measured by drying at 105°C for 3 h (p<0.05). All samples except SDPP (p = 0.70) dried at 105°C for 6, 9, 12, or 15 h caused more LOD compared with the samples dried for at 105°C for 3 h (p<0.05). The LOD contents of the individual ingredients were additive when dried at 105°C regardless of drying time. In Exp. 2, moisture contents of corn, SBM, wheat, whey permeate, whey powder, lactose, and 2 sources of DDGS (DDGS1 and DDGS2) were measured by the Karl Fischer method, oven drying at 135°C for 2 h, and oven drying at 125°C, 115°C, 105°C, or 95°C for increasing drying time from 1 to 24 h. Drying samples at 135°C for 2 h resulted in higher moisture content in whey permeate (7.5% vs 3.0%), whey powder (7.7% vs 3.8%), DDGS1 (11.4% vs 7.5%), and DDGS2 (13.1% vs 8.8%) compared with the Karl Fischer method (p<0.05). Whey permeate and whey powder were considerably darkened as the drying time increased. In conclusion, drying samples at 135°C for 2 h is not appropriate for determining the moisture content in whey permeate, whey powder, or DDGS as well as the mixed diet containing these ingredients. The oven-drying method at 105°C for 5 to 6 h appears to be appropriate for whey permeate and whey powder, and at 105°C for 2 to 3 h for DDGS. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4213707/ /pubmed/25358322 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14305 Text en Copyright © 2014 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Ahn, J. Y.
Kil, D. Y.
Kong, C.
Kim, B. G.
Comparison of Oven-drying Methods for Determination of Moisture Content in Feed Ingredients
title Comparison of Oven-drying Methods for Determination of Moisture Content in Feed Ingredients
title_full Comparison of Oven-drying Methods for Determination of Moisture Content in Feed Ingredients
title_fullStr Comparison of Oven-drying Methods for Determination of Moisture Content in Feed Ingredients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Oven-drying Methods for Determination of Moisture Content in Feed Ingredients
title_short Comparison of Oven-drying Methods for Determination of Moisture Content in Feed Ingredients
title_sort comparison of oven-drying methods for determination of moisture content in feed ingredients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4213707/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25358322
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14305
work_keys_str_mv AT ahnjy comparisonofovendryingmethodsfordeterminationofmoisturecontentinfeedingredients
AT kildy comparisonofovendryingmethodsfordeterminationofmoisturecontentinfeedingredients
AT kongc comparisonofovendryingmethodsfordeterminationofmoisturecontentinfeedingredients
AT kimbg comparisonofovendryingmethodsfordeterminationofmoisturecontentinfeedingredients