Cargando…
A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The current dental restorative concepts are characterized by an increased effort towards a less invasive treatment of carious lesions. Minimally invasive cavity preparation techniques are intended to preserve as much sound enamel and dentin as possible, during the treatment...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4213874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565741 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.140821 |
_version_ | 1782341881026314240 |
---|---|
author | Naik, Saraswathi V Shashikiran, N D Chaitra, N L Syed, Ghousia |
author_facet | Naik, Saraswathi V Shashikiran, N D Chaitra, N L Syed, Ghousia |
author_sort | Naik, Saraswathi V |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The current dental restorative concepts are characterized by an increased effort towards a less invasive treatment of carious lesions. Minimally invasive cavity preparation techniques are intended to preserve as much sound enamel and dentin as possible, during the treatment of carious lesions. The objective of this in vitro study is to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of single-etch adhesives (Adper Easy one) on caries-affected dentin, following three different caries removal techniques, namely, Carisolv, Conventional carbide bur at slow speed, and aqueous calcium hydroxide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 teeth were divided into three groups and arranged with 10 samples in each group - round bur (Group A), Carisolv (Group B), Aqueous calcium hydroxide (Group C). Following caries excavation by using the three above -mentioned techniques, application of the bonding agent and composite buildup was done. Following sectioning of the samples with the help of a hard tissue microtome, Group A, B, and C were again trimmed into an hour-glass shape, maintaining a width of 1.2 mm in the center of an hour glass. These were debonded under a microtensile load at failure, using the Instron Universal Testing Machine. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower microtensile bond strength in the group where the caries was removed by the round bur, as compared to the group where the caries was removed by using Carisolv and calcium hydroxide, which showed higher microtensile bond strength, that is, the significant pairing of Groups were Group A to Group B and Group A to Group C, exhibiting statistically significant difference with a P < 0.001. However, there was no statistically significant difference between Group B and Group C. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: Carisolv and aqueous calcium hydroxide have proven to be good methods of caries removal for achieving a higher microtensile bond strength of the single-bottle self-etch adhesive on dentin. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4213874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42138742014-11-17 A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study Naik, Saraswathi V Shashikiran, N D Chaitra, N L Syed, Ghousia Indian J Dent Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The current dental restorative concepts are characterized by an increased effort towards a less invasive treatment of carious lesions. Minimally invasive cavity preparation techniques are intended to preserve as much sound enamel and dentin as possible, during the treatment of carious lesions. The objective of this in vitro study is to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of single-etch adhesives (Adper Easy one) on caries-affected dentin, following three different caries removal techniques, namely, Carisolv, Conventional carbide bur at slow speed, and aqueous calcium hydroxide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 teeth were divided into three groups and arranged with 10 samples in each group - round bur (Group A), Carisolv (Group B), Aqueous calcium hydroxide (Group C). Following caries excavation by using the three above -mentioned techniques, application of the bonding agent and composite buildup was done. Following sectioning of the samples with the help of a hard tissue microtome, Group A, B, and C were again trimmed into an hour-glass shape, maintaining a width of 1.2 mm in the center of an hour glass. These were debonded under a microtensile load at failure, using the Instron Universal Testing Machine. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower microtensile bond strength in the group where the caries was removed by the round bur, as compared to the group where the caries was removed by using Carisolv and calcium hydroxide, which showed higher microtensile bond strength, that is, the significant pairing of Groups were Group A to Group B and Group A to Group C, exhibiting statistically significant difference with a P < 0.001. However, there was no statistically significant difference between Group B and Group C. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: Carisolv and aqueous calcium hydroxide have proven to be good methods of caries removal for achieving a higher microtensile bond strength of the single-bottle self-etch adhesive on dentin. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4213874/ /pubmed/25565741 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.140821 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Naik, Saraswathi V Shashikiran, N D Chaitra, N L Syed, Ghousia A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study |
title | A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study |
title_full | A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study |
title_fullStr | A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study |
title_short | A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study |
title_sort | microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: an in-vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4213874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565741 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.140821 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naiksaraswathiv amicrotensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy AT shashikirannd amicrotensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy AT chaitranl amicrotensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy AT syedghousia amicrotensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy AT naiksaraswathiv microtensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy AT shashikirannd microtensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy AT chaitranl microtensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy AT syedghousia microtensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy |