Cargando…

A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The current dental restorative concepts are characterized by an increased effort towards a less invasive treatment of carious lesions. Minimally invasive cavity preparation techniques are intended to preserve as much sound enamel and dentin as possible, during the treatment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Naik, Saraswathi V, Shashikiran, N D, Chaitra, N L, Syed, Ghousia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4213874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565741
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.140821
_version_ 1782341881026314240
author Naik, Saraswathi V
Shashikiran, N D
Chaitra, N L
Syed, Ghousia
author_facet Naik, Saraswathi V
Shashikiran, N D
Chaitra, N L
Syed, Ghousia
author_sort Naik, Saraswathi V
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The current dental restorative concepts are characterized by an increased effort towards a less invasive treatment of carious lesions. Minimally invasive cavity preparation techniques are intended to preserve as much sound enamel and dentin as possible, during the treatment of carious lesions. The objective of this in vitro study is to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of single-etch adhesives (Adper Easy one) on caries-affected dentin, following three different caries removal techniques, namely, Carisolv, Conventional carbide bur at slow speed, and aqueous calcium hydroxide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 teeth were divided into three groups and arranged with 10 samples in each group - round bur (Group A), Carisolv (Group B), Aqueous calcium hydroxide (Group C). Following caries excavation by using the three above -mentioned techniques, application of the bonding agent and composite buildup was done. Following sectioning of the samples with the help of a hard tissue microtome, Group A, B, and C were again trimmed into an hour-glass shape, maintaining a width of 1.2 mm in the center of an hour glass. These were debonded under a microtensile load at failure, using the Instron Universal Testing Machine. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower microtensile bond strength in the group where the caries was removed by the round bur, as compared to the group where the caries was removed by using Carisolv and calcium hydroxide, which showed higher microtensile bond strength, that is, the significant pairing of Groups were Group A to Group B and Group A to Group C, exhibiting statistically significant difference with a P < 0.001. However, there was no statistically significant difference between Group B and Group C. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: Carisolv and aqueous calcium hydroxide have proven to be good methods of caries removal for achieving a higher microtensile bond strength of the single-bottle self-etch adhesive on dentin.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4213874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42138742014-11-17 A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study Naik, Saraswathi V Shashikiran, N D Chaitra, N L Syed, Ghousia Indian J Dent Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The current dental restorative concepts are characterized by an increased effort towards a less invasive treatment of carious lesions. Minimally invasive cavity preparation techniques are intended to preserve as much sound enamel and dentin as possible, during the treatment of carious lesions. The objective of this in vitro study is to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of single-etch adhesives (Adper Easy one) on caries-affected dentin, following three different caries removal techniques, namely, Carisolv, Conventional carbide bur at slow speed, and aqueous calcium hydroxide. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 teeth were divided into three groups and arranged with 10 samples in each group - round bur (Group A), Carisolv (Group B), Aqueous calcium hydroxide (Group C). Following caries excavation by using the three above -mentioned techniques, application of the bonding agent and composite buildup was done. Following sectioning of the samples with the help of a hard tissue microtome, Group A, B, and C were again trimmed into an hour-glass shape, maintaining a width of 1.2 mm in the center of an hour glass. These were debonded under a microtensile load at failure, using the Instron Universal Testing Machine. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower microtensile bond strength in the group where the caries was removed by the round bur, as compared to the group where the caries was removed by using Carisolv and calcium hydroxide, which showed higher microtensile bond strength, that is, the significant pairing of Groups were Group A to Group B and Group A to Group C, exhibiting statistically significant difference with a P < 0.001. However, there was no statistically significant difference between Group B and Group C. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSION: Carisolv and aqueous calcium hydroxide have proven to be good methods of caries removal for achieving a higher microtensile bond strength of the single-bottle self-etch adhesive on dentin. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4213874/ /pubmed/25565741 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.140821 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Naik, Saraswathi V
Shashikiran, N D
Chaitra, N L
Syed, Ghousia
A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study
title A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study
title_full A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study
title_fullStr A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study
title_short A microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: An in-vitro study
title_sort microtensile bond strength evaluation of a single-bottle adhesive to caries-affected dentin in conventional versus minimal invasive caries removal techniques: an in-vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4213874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25565741
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.140821
work_keys_str_mv AT naiksaraswathiv amicrotensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy
AT shashikirannd amicrotensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy
AT chaitranl amicrotensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy
AT syedghousia amicrotensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy
AT naiksaraswathiv microtensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy
AT shashikirannd microtensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy
AT chaitranl microtensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy
AT syedghousia microtensilebondstrengthevaluationofasinglebottleadhesivetocariesaffecteddentininconventionalversusminimalinvasivecariesremovaltechniquesaninvitrostudy