Cargando…

Suitability assessment of health education brochures in Qassim province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND: Health education is the cornerstone of primary health care. Health education materials distributed to the community should, therefore, be suitable and effective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the health education brochures, designed and disseminated by Ministry of Health inst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jahan, Saulat, Al-Saigul, Abdullah M., Alharbi, Ali M., Abdelgadir, Muzamil H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25374471
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8229.142974
_version_ 1782341899504320512
author Jahan, Saulat
Al-Saigul, Abdullah M.
Alharbi, Ali M.
Abdelgadir, Muzamil H.
author_facet Jahan, Saulat
Al-Saigul, Abdullah M.
Alharbi, Ali M.
Abdelgadir, Muzamil H.
author_sort Jahan, Saulat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health education is the cornerstone of primary health care. Health education materials distributed to the community should, therefore, be suitable and effective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the health education brochures, designed and disseminated by Ministry of Health institutions in the Qassim province. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional review of health education brochures. We used a structured evaluation form, comprising general information on the brochures and a modified Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) score sheet. The SAM consisting of 22 criteria in six groups, includes content, literacy demands, graphics, layout/typography, learning stimulation/motivation, and cultural appropriateness. SAM criteria categorize written material into “superior,” “adequate” and “not suitable.” Two qualified consultant family physicians evaluated the brochures. Data were analyzed using Epi Info version 3.4 statistical package. RESULTS: We evaluated 110 brochures, the majority of which addressed chronic health conditions such as mental health, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Seventy-four (67.3%) brochures were evaluated as “adequate,” 34 (30.9%) as “not suitable” and 2 (1.8%) as “superior.” “Cultural appropriateness” was the highest scoring factor, with 92 (83.6%) brochures falling into either the “superior” or “adequate” category. With regard to “content,” 88 (80.0%) brochures fell into either the “superior” or “adequate” category. This was the second highest scoring factor. Graphics was the factor that scored the least. Seventy-five (68.2%) brochures were rated in this factor as “not suitable.” CONCLUSIONS: Although two-thirds of our brochures were considered “adequate,” the majority needed improvement to their graphics and learning stimulation factors. We recommend that guidelines for designing health education brochures should be formulated to improve the quality of health education brochures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4214009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42140092014-11-05 Suitability assessment of health education brochures in Qassim province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Jahan, Saulat Al-Saigul, Abdullah M. Alharbi, Ali M. Abdelgadir, Muzamil H. J Family Community Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Health education is the cornerstone of primary health care. Health education materials distributed to the community should, therefore, be suitable and effective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the health education brochures, designed and disseminated by Ministry of Health institutions in the Qassim province. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional review of health education brochures. We used a structured evaluation form, comprising general information on the brochures and a modified Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) score sheet. The SAM consisting of 22 criteria in six groups, includes content, literacy demands, graphics, layout/typography, learning stimulation/motivation, and cultural appropriateness. SAM criteria categorize written material into “superior,” “adequate” and “not suitable.” Two qualified consultant family physicians evaluated the brochures. Data were analyzed using Epi Info version 3.4 statistical package. RESULTS: We evaluated 110 brochures, the majority of which addressed chronic health conditions such as mental health, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Seventy-four (67.3%) brochures were evaluated as “adequate,” 34 (30.9%) as “not suitable” and 2 (1.8%) as “superior.” “Cultural appropriateness” was the highest scoring factor, with 92 (83.6%) brochures falling into either the “superior” or “adequate” category. With regard to “content,” 88 (80.0%) brochures fell into either the “superior” or “adequate” category. This was the second highest scoring factor. Graphics was the factor that scored the least. Seventy-five (68.2%) brochures were rated in this factor as “not suitable.” CONCLUSIONS: Although two-thirds of our brochures were considered “adequate,” the majority needed improvement to their graphics and learning stimulation factors. We recommend that guidelines for designing health education brochures should be formulated to improve the quality of health education brochures. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4214009/ /pubmed/25374471 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8229.142974 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Family and Community Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jahan, Saulat
Al-Saigul, Abdullah M.
Alharbi, Ali M.
Abdelgadir, Muzamil H.
Suitability assessment of health education brochures in Qassim province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title Suitability assessment of health education brochures in Qassim province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_full Suitability assessment of health education brochures in Qassim province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_fullStr Suitability assessment of health education brochures in Qassim province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_full_unstemmed Suitability assessment of health education brochures in Qassim province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_short Suitability assessment of health education brochures in Qassim province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
title_sort suitability assessment of health education brochures in qassim province, kingdom of saudi arabia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25374471
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8229.142974
work_keys_str_mv AT jahansaulat suitabilityassessmentofhealtheducationbrochuresinqassimprovincekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT alsaigulabdullahm suitabilityassessmentofhealtheducationbrochuresinqassimprovincekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT alharbialim suitabilityassessmentofhealtheducationbrochuresinqassimprovincekingdomofsaudiarabia
AT abdelgadirmuzamilh suitabilityassessmentofhealtheducationbrochuresinqassimprovincekingdomofsaudiarabia