Cargando…

Ultrasound-Guided Miniscalpel-Needle Release versus Dry Needling for Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective. To compare ultrasound-guided miniscalpel-needle (UG-MSN) release versus ultrasound-guided dry needling (UG-DN) for chronic neck pain. Methods. A total of 169 patients with chronic neck pain were randomized to receive either UG-MSN release or UG-DN. Before treatment and at 3 and 6 months p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Yongjun, Shi, Dongping, Wu, Xiaotong, Gu, Minghong, Ai, Zisheng, Tang, Kun, Ye, Le, Wang, Xiangrui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/235817
_version_ 1782341909191065600
author Zheng, Yongjun
Shi, Dongping
Wu, Xiaotong
Gu, Minghong
Ai, Zisheng
Tang, Kun
Ye, Le
Wang, Xiangrui
author_facet Zheng, Yongjun
Shi, Dongping
Wu, Xiaotong
Gu, Minghong
Ai, Zisheng
Tang, Kun
Ye, Le
Wang, Xiangrui
author_sort Zheng, Yongjun
collection PubMed
description Objective. To compare ultrasound-guided miniscalpel-needle (UG-MSN) release versus ultrasound-guided dry needling (UG-DN) for chronic neck pain. Methods. A total of 169 patients with chronic neck pain were randomized to receive either UG-MSN release or UG-DN. Before treatment and at 3 and 6 months posttreatment, pain was measured using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Neck function was examined using the neck disability index. Health-related quality of life was examined using the physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) of the SF-36 health status scale. Results. Patients in the UG-MSN release had greater improvement on the VAS (by 2 points at 3 months and 0.9 points at 6 months) versus in the UG-DN arm; (both P < 0.0001). Patients receiving UG-MSN release also showed significantly lower scores on the adjusted neck disability index, as well as significantly lower PCS. No severe complications were observed. Conclusion. UG-MSN release was superior to UG-DN in reducing pain intensity and neck disability in patients with chronic neck pain and was not associated with severe complications. The procedural aspects in the two arms were identical; however, we did not verify the blinding success. As such, the results need to be interpreted with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4214050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42140502014-11-10 Ultrasound-Guided Miniscalpel-Needle Release versus Dry Needling for Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Zheng, Yongjun Shi, Dongping Wu, Xiaotong Gu, Minghong Ai, Zisheng Tang, Kun Ye, Le Wang, Xiangrui Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article Objective. To compare ultrasound-guided miniscalpel-needle (UG-MSN) release versus ultrasound-guided dry needling (UG-DN) for chronic neck pain. Methods. A total of 169 patients with chronic neck pain were randomized to receive either UG-MSN release or UG-DN. Before treatment and at 3 and 6 months posttreatment, pain was measured using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Neck function was examined using the neck disability index. Health-related quality of life was examined using the physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) of the SF-36 health status scale. Results. Patients in the UG-MSN release had greater improvement on the VAS (by 2 points at 3 months and 0.9 points at 6 months) versus in the UG-DN arm; (both P < 0.0001). Patients receiving UG-MSN release also showed significantly lower scores on the adjusted neck disability index, as well as significantly lower PCS. No severe complications were observed. Conclusion. UG-MSN release was superior to UG-DN in reducing pain intensity and neck disability in patients with chronic neck pain and was not associated with severe complications. The procedural aspects in the two arms were identical; however, we did not verify the blinding success. As such, the results need to be interpreted with caution. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4214050/ /pubmed/25386218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/235817 Text en Copyright © 2014 Yongjun Zheng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zheng, Yongjun
Shi, Dongping
Wu, Xiaotong
Gu, Minghong
Ai, Zisheng
Tang, Kun
Ye, Le
Wang, Xiangrui
Ultrasound-Guided Miniscalpel-Needle Release versus Dry Needling for Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Ultrasound-Guided Miniscalpel-Needle Release versus Dry Needling for Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Ultrasound-Guided Miniscalpel-Needle Release versus Dry Needling for Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Ultrasound-Guided Miniscalpel-Needle Release versus Dry Needling for Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound-Guided Miniscalpel-Needle Release versus Dry Needling for Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Ultrasound-Guided Miniscalpel-Needle Release versus Dry Needling for Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort ultrasound-guided miniscalpel-needle release versus dry needling for chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25386218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/235817
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengyongjun ultrasoundguidedminiscalpelneedlereleaseversusdryneedlingforchronicneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shidongping ultrasoundguidedminiscalpelneedlereleaseversusdryneedlingforchronicneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuxiaotong ultrasoundguidedminiscalpelneedlereleaseversusdryneedlingforchronicneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guminghong ultrasoundguidedminiscalpelneedlereleaseversusdryneedlingforchronicneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT aizisheng ultrasoundguidedminiscalpelneedlereleaseversusdryneedlingforchronicneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tangkun ultrasoundguidedminiscalpelneedlereleaseversusdryneedlingforchronicneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yele ultrasoundguidedminiscalpelneedlereleaseversusdryneedlingforchronicneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangxiangrui ultrasoundguidedminiscalpelneedlereleaseversusdryneedlingforchronicneckpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial