Cargando…

Association between FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: A meta-analysis

Epidemiological studies have been conducted to investigate the association between the FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms, rs3761549 and rs3761548, and the risk of cancer. However, the results from these studies have been controversial. In order to obtain a more precise conclusion of this association, the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: JIANG, LING-LING, RUAN, LI-WEI
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25364468
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2585
_version_ 1782341967362916352
author JIANG, LING-LING
RUAN, LI-WEI
author_facet JIANG, LING-LING
RUAN, LI-WEI
author_sort JIANG, LING-LING
collection PubMed
description Epidemiological studies have been conducted to investigate the association between the FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms, rs3761549 and rs3761548, and the risk of cancer. However, the results from these studies have been controversial. In order to obtain a more precise conclusion of this association, the present meta-analysis was performed. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) values were used to assess any correlations between the data. Overall, the rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms of the FOXP3 gene were not associated with the cancer risk in an Asian population. In the subgroup analyses based on cancer type, no significant associations were identified between these two polymorphisms and breast cancer. However, the results altered when the analyses were restricted to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (for rs3761549: TT+CT vs. CC OR, 0.52, 95% CI, 0.38–0.72; TC vs. CC OR, 0.25, 95% CI, 0.16–0.39; T vs. C OR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.59–0.97. For rs3761548: AA vs. AC+CC OR, 3.20, 95% CI 1.76–5.81; AA+AC vs. CC OR, 2.56, 95% CI, 1.75–3.76; AA vs. CC OR, 4.41, 95% CI, 2.36–8.25; AC vs. CC OR, 2.15, 95% CI, 1.42–3.25; A vs. C OR, 2.32, 95% CI, 1.74–3.10). The present meta-analysis indicates that the FOXP3 rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms are not associated with the risk of breast cancer, but with the risk of HCC and NSCLC. Therefore, a study with a larger sample size is required to further evaluate this association.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4214479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42144792014-10-31 Association between FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: A meta-analysis JIANG, LING-LING RUAN, LI-WEI Oncol Lett Articles Epidemiological studies have been conducted to investigate the association between the FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms, rs3761549 and rs3761548, and the risk of cancer. However, the results from these studies have been controversial. In order to obtain a more precise conclusion of this association, the present meta-analysis was performed. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) values were used to assess any correlations between the data. Overall, the rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms of the FOXP3 gene were not associated with the cancer risk in an Asian population. In the subgroup analyses based on cancer type, no significant associations were identified between these two polymorphisms and breast cancer. However, the results altered when the analyses were restricted to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (for rs3761549: TT+CT vs. CC OR, 0.52, 95% CI, 0.38–0.72; TC vs. CC OR, 0.25, 95% CI, 0.16–0.39; T vs. C OR, 0.76, 95% CI, 0.59–0.97. For rs3761548: AA vs. AC+CC OR, 3.20, 95% CI 1.76–5.81; AA+AC vs. CC OR, 2.56, 95% CI, 1.75–3.76; AA vs. CC OR, 4.41, 95% CI, 2.36–8.25; AC vs. CC OR, 2.15, 95% CI, 1.42–3.25; A vs. C OR, 2.32, 95% CI, 1.74–3.10). The present meta-analysis indicates that the FOXP3 rs3761549 (C>T) and rs3761548 (C>A) polymorphisms are not associated with the risk of breast cancer, but with the risk of HCC and NSCLC. Therefore, a study with a larger sample size is required to further evaluate this association. D.A. Spandidos 2014-12 2014-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4214479/ /pubmed/25364468 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2585 Text en Copyright © 2014, Spandidos Publications http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. The article may be redistributed, reproduced, and reused for non-commercial purposes, provided the original source is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
JIANG, LING-LING
RUAN, LI-WEI
Association between FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: A meta-analysis
title Association between FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: A meta-analysis
title_full Association between FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Association between FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Association between FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: A meta-analysis
title_short Association between FOXP3 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: A meta-analysis
title_sort association between foxp3 promoter polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25364468
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2585
work_keys_str_mv AT jianglingling associationbetweenfoxp3promoterpolymorphismsandcancerriskametaanalysis
AT ruanliwei associationbetweenfoxp3promoterpolymorphismsandcancerriskametaanalysis