Cargando…

Sympatric Woodland Myotis Bats Form Tight-Knit Social Groups with Exclusive Roost Home Ranges

BACKGROUND: The structuring of wild animal populations can influence population dynamics, disease spread, and information transfer. Social network analysis potentially offers insights into these processes but is rarely, if ever, used to investigate more than one species in a community. We therefore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: August, Tom A., Nunn, Miles A., Fensome, Amy G., Linton, Danielle M., Mathews, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25356770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112225
_version_ 1782342009812418560
author August, Tom A.
Nunn, Miles A.
Fensome, Amy G.
Linton, Danielle M.
Mathews, Fiona
author_facet August, Tom A.
Nunn, Miles A.
Fensome, Amy G.
Linton, Danielle M.
Mathews, Fiona
author_sort August, Tom A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The structuring of wild animal populations can influence population dynamics, disease spread, and information transfer. Social network analysis potentially offers insights into these processes but is rarely, if ever, used to investigate more than one species in a community. We therefore compared the social, temporal and spatial networks of sympatric Myotis bats (M. nattereri (Natterer's bats) and M. daubentonii (Daubenton's bats)), and asked: (1) are there long-lasting social associations within species? (2) do the ranges occupied by roosting social groups overlap within or between species? (3) are M. daubentonii bachelor colonies excluded from roosting in areas used by maternity groups? RESULTS: Using data on 490 ringed M. nattereri and 978 M. daubentonii from 379 colonies, we found that both species formed stable social groups encompassing multiple colonies. M. nattereri formed 11 mixed-sex social groups with few (4.3%) inter-group associations. Approximately half of all M. nattereri were associated with the same individuals when recaptured, with many associations being long-term (>100 days). In contrast, M. daubentonii were sexually segregated; only a quarter of pairs were associated at recapture after a few days, and inter-sex associations were not long-lasting. Social groups of M. nattereri and female M. daubentonii had small roost home ranges (mean 0.2 km(2) in each case). Intra-specific overlap was low, but inter-specific overlap was high, suggesting territoriality within but not between species. M. daubentonii bachelor colonies did not appear to be excluded from roosting areas used by females. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest marked species- and sex-specific patterns of disease and information transmission are likely between bats of the same genus despite sharing a common habitat. The clear partitioning of the woodland amongst social groups, and their apparent reliance on small patches of habitat for roosting, means that localised woodland management may be more important to bat conservation than previously recognised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4214762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42147622014-11-05 Sympatric Woodland Myotis Bats Form Tight-Knit Social Groups with Exclusive Roost Home Ranges August, Tom A. Nunn, Miles A. Fensome, Amy G. Linton, Danielle M. Mathews, Fiona PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The structuring of wild animal populations can influence population dynamics, disease spread, and information transfer. Social network analysis potentially offers insights into these processes but is rarely, if ever, used to investigate more than one species in a community. We therefore compared the social, temporal and spatial networks of sympatric Myotis bats (M. nattereri (Natterer's bats) and M. daubentonii (Daubenton's bats)), and asked: (1) are there long-lasting social associations within species? (2) do the ranges occupied by roosting social groups overlap within or between species? (3) are M. daubentonii bachelor colonies excluded from roosting in areas used by maternity groups? RESULTS: Using data on 490 ringed M. nattereri and 978 M. daubentonii from 379 colonies, we found that both species formed stable social groups encompassing multiple colonies. M. nattereri formed 11 mixed-sex social groups with few (4.3%) inter-group associations. Approximately half of all M. nattereri were associated with the same individuals when recaptured, with many associations being long-term (>100 days). In contrast, M. daubentonii were sexually segregated; only a quarter of pairs were associated at recapture after a few days, and inter-sex associations were not long-lasting. Social groups of M. nattereri and female M. daubentonii had small roost home ranges (mean 0.2 km(2) in each case). Intra-specific overlap was low, but inter-specific overlap was high, suggesting territoriality within but not between species. M. daubentonii bachelor colonies did not appear to be excluded from roosting areas used by females. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest marked species- and sex-specific patterns of disease and information transmission are likely between bats of the same genus despite sharing a common habitat. The clear partitioning of the woodland amongst social groups, and their apparent reliance on small patches of habitat for roosting, means that localised woodland management may be more important to bat conservation than previously recognised. Public Library of Science 2014-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4214762/ /pubmed/25356770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112225 Text en © 2014 August et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
August, Tom A.
Nunn, Miles A.
Fensome, Amy G.
Linton, Danielle M.
Mathews, Fiona
Sympatric Woodland Myotis Bats Form Tight-Knit Social Groups with Exclusive Roost Home Ranges
title Sympatric Woodland Myotis Bats Form Tight-Knit Social Groups with Exclusive Roost Home Ranges
title_full Sympatric Woodland Myotis Bats Form Tight-Knit Social Groups with Exclusive Roost Home Ranges
title_fullStr Sympatric Woodland Myotis Bats Form Tight-Knit Social Groups with Exclusive Roost Home Ranges
title_full_unstemmed Sympatric Woodland Myotis Bats Form Tight-Knit Social Groups with Exclusive Roost Home Ranges
title_short Sympatric Woodland Myotis Bats Form Tight-Knit Social Groups with Exclusive Roost Home Ranges
title_sort sympatric woodland myotis bats form tight-knit social groups with exclusive roost home ranges
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25356770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112225
work_keys_str_mv AT augusttoma sympatricwoodlandmyotisbatsformtightknitsocialgroupswithexclusiveroosthomeranges
AT nunnmilesa sympatricwoodlandmyotisbatsformtightknitsocialgroupswithexclusiveroosthomeranges
AT fensomeamyg sympatricwoodlandmyotisbatsformtightknitsocialgroupswithexclusiveroosthomeranges
AT lintondaniellem sympatricwoodlandmyotisbatsformtightknitsocialgroupswithexclusiveroosthomeranges
AT mathewsfiona sympatricwoodlandmyotisbatsformtightknitsocialgroupswithexclusiveroosthomeranges