Cargando…

Why Double-Blind Review Is Preferable for Scholarly Journals

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Lotfi, Behrooz, Mahian, Omid
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:	Correspondence
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4214948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25368501 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.10.1438

Ejemplares similares

How to Encourage Best Peer Reviewers: An Empiric Approach
por: Mahian, Omid, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Decoupling the scholarly journal
por: Priem, Jason, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Conservation of Scholarly Journals
Publicado: (1942)

Authorship and Contributorship in Scholarly Journals
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
Publicado: (2013)

Civil discourse in scholarly communications: an editorial responsibility?
por: Craig, Kenneth D., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Peer review processes and related issues in scholarly journals
por: Saeidnia, Soodabeh, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Assessing citations with Google Scholar: A new feature
por: Ahmed, K. K. Mueen
Publicado: (2012)

A brief history of the evolution of the Parliamentary Scholar Scheme
por: Jones, Keir, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Upgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Plagiarism Continues to Affect Scholarly Journals
por: Hong, Sung-Tae
Publicado: (2017)

Characteristics of scholars who review for predatory and legitimate journals: linkage study of Cabells Scholarly Analytics and Publons data
por: Severin, Anna, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Evolution of the scholarly mega-journal, 2006–2017
por: Björk, Bo-Christer
Publicado: (2018)

Survey of scholarly journal licensing & acquisition practices
por: Primary Research Group
Publicado: (2012)

Journal Metrics of Infection & Chemotherapy and Current Scholarly Journal Publication Issues
por: Huh, Sun
Publicado: (2018)

Why scholarly publishing might be a bubble
por: Barić, Hrvoje, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

"Predatory Journals" or "Predatory Scholars?" The Essential Role of the Peer Review Process
por: Chirico, Francesco
Publicado: (2017)

Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals
por: Squazzoni, Flaminio, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Recommendations and guidelines for creating scholarly biomedical journals: A scoping review
por: Ng, Jeremy Y., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Double-edged blinde, hemorrhagic or cardioembolic cognitive impairment
por: Cerit, Levent, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Employing Unprofessional Editors for Handling Submissions in Scholarly Journals
por: Habibzadeh, Farrokh
Publicado: (2023)

Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal
por: Malički, Mario, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
por: Bravo, Giangiacomo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Ethical Reviewers are Essential for Scholarly Journals for Timely Processing of Submissions and Avoiding Retractions
por: Mehregan, Mina
Publicado: (2019)

Are Scholarly Journals in Search for Top Quality Articles or Authors in Search for High Quality Journals?
por: Sadeghi, Mohammad Reza
Publicado: (2017)

Journal statistics, coping strategy with upcoming scholarly journal publishing environment including Plan-S, and appreciation for reviewers and volunteers
por: Huh, Sun
Publicado: (2019)

Entropy in Nanofluids
por: Lorenzini, Giulio, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A Study of Innovative Features in Scholarly Open Access Journals
por: Björk, Bo-Christer
Publicado: (2011)

Introducing ATS Scholar, the American Thoracic Society Education Journal
por: Seam, Nitin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cumulative advantage and citation performance of repeat authors in scholarly journals
por: Siler, Kyle, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Editorial Strategy to Get a Scholarly Journal Indexed by Scopus
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Progressive and degenerative journals: on the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing
por: Dunleavy, Daniel J.
Publicado: (2022)

Towards epistemic justice in nursing research in China: Time for Chinese nursing scholars to actively engage with philosophical inquiries
por: Zhao, Junqiang
Publicado: (2021)

Letter to the Journal
Publicado: (1878)

Similarity and Plagiarism in Scholarly Journal Submissions: Bringing Clarity to the Concept for Authors, Reviewers and Editors
por: Memon, Aamir Raoof
Publicado: (2020)

Why epigenetics is (not) a biosocial science and why that matters
por: Chiapperino, Luca, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A longitudinal study of independent scholar-published open access journals
por: Björk, Bo-Christer, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The impact of Plan S on scholarly journals from less developed European countries
por: Petrak, Jelka, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Authors and Editors of Scholarly Journals Should be Aware of Plagiarism and Its Consequences
Publicado: (2021)

Publishing in learned journals
por: Arseculeratne, S.N.
Publicado: (2010)

Advertisements in Medical Journals
por: Mukherjee, I. B.
Publicado: (1950)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_72mtmm5hbhf0o7iioi878b0pt8