Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Docherty, Graeme, Lewis, Sarah, McEwen, Andy, Bauld, Linda, Coleman, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Research Letter
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23880552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051107
_version_ 1782342076352954368
author Docherty, Graeme
Lewis, Sarah
McEwen, Andy
Bauld, Linda
Coleman, Tim
author_facet Docherty, Graeme
Lewis, Sarah
McEwen, Andy
Bauld, Linda
Coleman, Tim
author_sort Docherty, Graeme
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4215351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42153512014-11-05 Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT? Docherty, Graeme Lewis, Sarah McEwen, Andy Bauld, Linda Coleman, Tim Tob Control Research Letter BMJ Publishing Group 2014-11 2013-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4215351/ /pubmed/23880552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051107 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Research Letter
Docherty, Graeme
Lewis, Sarah
McEwen, Andy
Bauld, Linda
Coleman, Tim
Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?
title Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?
title_full Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?
title_fullStr Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?
title_full_unstemmed Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?
title_short Does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering NRT to quitline callers in a RCT?
title_sort does use of ‘non-trial’ cessation support help explain the lack of effect from offering nrt to quitline callers in a rct?
topic Research Letter
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23880552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051107
work_keys_str_mv AT dochertygraeme doesuseofnontrialcessationsupporthelpexplainthelackofeffectfromofferingnrttoquitlinecallersinarct
AT lewissarah doesuseofnontrialcessationsupporthelpexplainthelackofeffectfromofferingnrttoquitlinecallersinarct
AT mcewenandy doesuseofnontrialcessationsupporthelpexplainthelackofeffectfromofferingnrttoquitlinecallersinarct
AT bauldlinda doesuseofnontrialcessationsupporthelpexplainthelackofeffectfromofferingnrttoquitlinecallersinarct
AT colemantim doesuseofnontrialcessationsupporthelpexplainthelackofeffectfromofferingnrttoquitlinecallersinarct

Ejemplares similares