Cargando…

Assessment of blood–brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review

There is increasing recognition of the importance of blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption in aging, dementia, stroke and multiple sclerosis in addition to more commonly-studied pathologies such as tumors. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is a method for studying BBB disruption in vivo. We rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heye, Anna K., Culling, Ross D., Valdés Hernández, Maria del C., Thrippleton, Michael J., Wardlaw, Joanna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.09.002
_version_ 1782342100061257728
author Heye, Anna K.
Culling, Ross D.
Valdés Hernández, Maria del C.
Thrippleton, Michael J.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
author_facet Heye, Anna K.
Culling, Ross D.
Valdés Hernández, Maria del C.
Thrippleton, Michael J.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
author_sort Heye, Anna K.
collection PubMed
description There is increasing recognition of the importance of blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption in aging, dementia, stroke and multiple sclerosis in addition to more commonly-studied pathologies such as tumors. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is a method for studying BBB disruption in vivo. We review pathologies studied, scanning protocols and data analysis procedures to determine the range of available methods and their suitability to different pathologies. We systematically review the existing literature up to February 2014, seeking studies that assessed BBB integrity using T1-weighted DCE-MRI techniques in animals and humans in normal or abnormal brain tissues. The literature search provided 70 studies that were eligible for inclusion, involving 417 animals and 1564 human subjects in total. The pathologies most studied are intracranial neoplasms and acute ischemic strokes. There are large variations in the type of DCE-MRI sequence, the imaging protocols and the contrast agents used. Moreover, studies use a variety of different methods for data analysis, mainly based on model-free measurements and on the Patlak and Tofts models. Consequently, estimated K(Trans) values varied widely. In conclusion, DCE-MRI is shown to provide valuable information in a large variety of applications, ranging from common applications, such as grading of primary brain tumors, to more recent applications, such as assessment of subtle BBB dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Further research is required in order to establish consensus-based recommendations for data acquisition and analysis and, hence, improve inter-study comparability and promote wider use of DCE-MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4215461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42154612014-11-06 Assessment of blood–brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review Heye, Anna K. Culling, Ross D. Valdés Hernández, Maria del C. Thrippleton, Michael J. Wardlaw, Joanna M. Neuroimage Clin Article There is increasing recognition of the importance of blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption in aging, dementia, stroke and multiple sclerosis in addition to more commonly-studied pathologies such as tumors. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) is a method for studying BBB disruption in vivo. We review pathologies studied, scanning protocols and data analysis procedures to determine the range of available methods and their suitability to different pathologies. We systematically review the existing literature up to February 2014, seeking studies that assessed BBB integrity using T1-weighted DCE-MRI techniques in animals and humans in normal or abnormal brain tissues. The literature search provided 70 studies that were eligible for inclusion, involving 417 animals and 1564 human subjects in total. The pathologies most studied are intracranial neoplasms and acute ischemic strokes. There are large variations in the type of DCE-MRI sequence, the imaging protocols and the contrast agents used. Moreover, studies use a variety of different methods for data analysis, mainly based on model-free measurements and on the Patlak and Tofts models. Consequently, estimated K(Trans) values varied widely. In conclusion, DCE-MRI is shown to provide valuable information in a large variety of applications, ranging from common applications, such as grading of primary brain tumors, to more recent applications, such as assessment of subtle BBB dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Further research is required in order to establish consensus-based recommendations for data acquisition and analysis and, hence, improve inter-study comparability and promote wider use of DCE-MRI. Elsevier 2014-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4215461/ /pubmed/25379439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.09.002 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-SA license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Heye, Anna K.
Culling, Ross D.
Valdés Hernández, Maria del C.
Thrippleton, Michael J.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
Assessment of blood–brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review
title Assessment of blood–brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review
title_full Assessment of blood–brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review
title_fullStr Assessment of blood–brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of blood–brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review
title_short Assessment of blood–brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review
title_sort assessment of blood–brain barrier disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced mri. a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25379439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.09.002
work_keys_str_mv AT heyeannak assessmentofbloodbrainbarrierdisruptionusingdynamiccontrastenhancedmriasystematicreview
AT cullingrossd assessmentofbloodbrainbarrierdisruptionusingdynamiccontrastenhancedmriasystematicreview
AT valdeshernandezmariadelc assessmentofbloodbrainbarrierdisruptionusingdynamiccontrastenhancedmriasystematicreview
AT thrippletonmichaelj assessmentofbloodbrainbarrierdisruptionusingdynamiccontrastenhancedmriasystematicreview
AT wardlawjoannam assessmentofbloodbrainbarrierdisruptionusingdynamiccontrastenhancedmriasystematicreview