Cargando…
The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Google Trends is a novel, freely accessible tool that allows users to interact with Internet search data, which may provide deep insights into population behavior and health-related phenomena. However, there is limited knowledge about its potential uses and limitations. We therefore syst...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583 |
_version_ | 1782342131638075392 |
---|---|
author | Nuti, Sudhakar V. Wayda, Brian Ranasinghe, Isuru Wang, Sisi Dreyer, Rachel P. Chen, Serene I. Murugiah, Karthik |
author_facet | Nuti, Sudhakar V. Wayda, Brian Ranasinghe, Isuru Wang, Sisi Dreyer, Rachel P. Chen, Serene I. Murugiah, Karthik |
author_sort | Nuti, Sudhakar V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Google Trends is a novel, freely accessible tool that allows users to interact with Internet search data, which may provide deep insights into population behavior and health-related phenomena. However, there is limited knowledge about its potential uses and limitations. We therefore systematically reviewed health care literature using Google Trends to classify articles by topic and study aim; evaluate the methodology and validation of the tool; and address limitations for its use in research. METHODS AND FINDINGS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers systematically identified studies utilizing Google Trends for health care research from MEDLINE and PubMed. Seventy studies met our inclusion criteria. Google Trends publications increased seven-fold from 2009 to 2013. Studies were classified into four topic domains: infectious disease (27% of articles), mental health and substance use (24%), other non-communicable diseases (16%), and general population behavior (33%). By use, 27% of articles utilized Google Trends for casual inference, 39% for description, and 34% for surveillance. Among surveillance studies, 92% were validated against a reference standard data source, and 80% of studies using correlation had a correlation statistic ≥0.70. Overall, 67% of articles provided a rationale for their search input. However, only 7% of articles were reproducible based on complete documentation of search strategy. We present a checklist to facilitate appropriate methodological documentation for future studies. A limitation of the study is the challenge of classifying heterogeneous studies utilizing a novel data source. CONCLUSION: Google Trends is being used to study health phenomena in a variety of topic domains in myriad ways. However, poor documentation of methods precludes the reproducibility of the findings. Such documentation would enable other researchers to determine the consistency of results provided by Google Trends for a well-specified query over time. Furthermore, greater transparency can improve its reliability as a research tool. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4215636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42156362014-11-05 The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review Nuti, Sudhakar V. Wayda, Brian Ranasinghe, Isuru Wang, Sisi Dreyer, Rachel P. Chen, Serene I. Murugiah, Karthik PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Google Trends is a novel, freely accessible tool that allows users to interact with Internet search data, which may provide deep insights into population behavior and health-related phenomena. However, there is limited knowledge about its potential uses and limitations. We therefore systematically reviewed health care literature using Google Trends to classify articles by topic and study aim; evaluate the methodology and validation of the tool; and address limitations for its use in research. METHODS AND FINDINGS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers systematically identified studies utilizing Google Trends for health care research from MEDLINE and PubMed. Seventy studies met our inclusion criteria. Google Trends publications increased seven-fold from 2009 to 2013. Studies were classified into four topic domains: infectious disease (27% of articles), mental health and substance use (24%), other non-communicable diseases (16%), and general population behavior (33%). By use, 27% of articles utilized Google Trends for casual inference, 39% for description, and 34% for surveillance. Among surveillance studies, 92% were validated against a reference standard data source, and 80% of studies using correlation had a correlation statistic ≥0.70. Overall, 67% of articles provided a rationale for their search input. However, only 7% of articles were reproducible based on complete documentation of search strategy. We present a checklist to facilitate appropriate methodological documentation for future studies. A limitation of the study is the challenge of classifying heterogeneous studies utilizing a novel data source. CONCLUSION: Google Trends is being used to study health phenomena in a variety of topic domains in myriad ways. However, poor documentation of methods precludes the reproducibility of the findings. Such documentation would enable other researchers to determine the consistency of results provided by Google Trends for a well-specified query over time. Furthermore, greater transparency can improve its reliability as a research tool. Public Library of Science 2014-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4215636/ /pubmed/25337815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583 Text en © 2014 Nuti et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Nuti, Sudhakar V. Wayda, Brian Ranasinghe, Isuru Wang, Sisi Dreyer, Rachel P. Chen, Serene I. Murugiah, Karthik The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review |
title | The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | use of google trends in health care research: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nutisudhakarv theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT waydabrian theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT ranasingheisuru theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT wangsisi theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT dreyerrachelp theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT chenserenei theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT murugiahkarthik theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT nutisudhakarv useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT waydabrian useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT ranasingheisuru useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT wangsisi useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT dreyerrachelp useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT chenserenei useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview AT murugiahkarthik useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview |