Cargando…

The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Google Trends is a novel, freely accessible tool that allows users to interact with Internet search data, which may provide deep insights into population behavior and health-related phenomena. However, there is limited knowledge about its potential uses and limitations. We therefore syst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nuti, Sudhakar V., Wayda, Brian, Ranasinghe, Isuru, Wang, Sisi, Dreyer, Rachel P., Chen, Serene I., Murugiah, Karthik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583
_version_ 1782342131638075392
author Nuti, Sudhakar V.
Wayda, Brian
Ranasinghe, Isuru
Wang, Sisi
Dreyer, Rachel P.
Chen, Serene I.
Murugiah, Karthik
author_facet Nuti, Sudhakar V.
Wayda, Brian
Ranasinghe, Isuru
Wang, Sisi
Dreyer, Rachel P.
Chen, Serene I.
Murugiah, Karthik
author_sort Nuti, Sudhakar V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Google Trends is a novel, freely accessible tool that allows users to interact with Internet search data, which may provide deep insights into population behavior and health-related phenomena. However, there is limited knowledge about its potential uses and limitations. We therefore systematically reviewed health care literature using Google Trends to classify articles by topic and study aim; evaluate the methodology and validation of the tool; and address limitations for its use in research. METHODS AND FINDINGS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers systematically identified studies utilizing Google Trends for health care research from MEDLINE and PubMed. Seventy studies met our inclusion criteria. Google Trends publications increased seven-fold from 2009 to 2013. Studies were classified into four topic domains: infectious disease (27% of articles), mental health and substance use (24%), other non-communicable diseases (16%), and general population behavior (33%). By use, 27% of articles utilized Google Trends for casual inference, 39% for description, and 34% for surveillance. Among surveillance studies, 92% were validated against a reference standard data source, and 80% of studies using correlation had a correlation statistic ≥0.70. Overall, 67% of articles provided a rationale for their search input. However, only 7% of articles were reproducible based on complete documentation of search strategy. We present a checklist to facilitate appropriate methodological documentation for future studies. A limitation of the study is the challenge of classifying heterogeneous studies utilizing a novel data source. CONCLUSION: Google Trends is being used to study health phenomena in a variety of topic domains in myriad ways. However, poor documentation of methods precludes the reproducibility of the findings. Such documentation would enable other researchers to determine the consistency of results provided by Google Trends for a well-specified query over time. Furthermore, greater transparency can improve its reliability as a research tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4215636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42156362014-11-05 The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review Nuti, Sudhakar V. Wayda, Brian Ranasinghe, Isuru Wang, Sisi Dreyer, Rachel P. Chen, Serene I. Murugiah, Karthik PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Google Trends is a novel, freely accessible tool that allows users to interact with Internet search data, which may provide deep insights into population behavior and health-related phenomena. However, there is limited knowledge about its potential uses and limitations. We therefore systematically reviewed health care literature using Google Trends to classify articles by topic and study aim; evaluate the methodology and validation of the tool; and address limitations for its use in research. METHODS AND FINDINGS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. Two independent reviewers systematically identified studies utilizing Google Trends for health care research from MEDLINE and PubMed. Seventy studies met our inclusion criteria. Google Trends publications increased seven-fold from 2009 to 2013. Studies were classified into four topic domains: infectious disease (27% of articles), mental health and substance use (24%), other non-communicable diseases (16%), and general population behavior (33%). By use, 27% of articles utilized Google Trends for casual inference, 39% for description, and 34% for surveillance. Among surveillance studies, 92% were validated against a reference standard data source, and 80% of studies using correlation had a correlation statistic ≥0.70. Overall, 67% of articles provided a rationale for their search input. However, only 7% of articles were reproducible based on complete documentation of search strategy. We present a checklist to facilitate appropriate methodological documentation for future studies. A limitation of the study is the challenge of classifying heterogeneous studies utilizing a novel data source. CONCLUSION: Google Trends is being used to study health phenomena in a variety of topic domains in myriad ways. However, poor documentation of methods precludes the reproducibility of the findings. Such documentation would enable other researchers to determine the consistency of results provided by Google Trends for a well-specified query over time. Furthermore, greater transparency can improve its reliability as a research tool. Public Library of Science 2014-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4215636/ /pubmed/25337815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583 Text en © 2014 Nuti et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nuti, Sudhakar V.
Wayda, Brian
Ranasinghe, Isuru
Wang, Sisi
Dreyer, Rachel P.
Chen, Serene I.
Murugiah, Karthik
The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review
title The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review
title_full The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review
title_short The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review
title_sort use of google trends in health care research: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4215636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25337815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109583
work_keys_str_mv AT nutisudhakarv theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT waydabrian theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT ranasingheisuru theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT wangsisi theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT dreyerrachelp theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT chenserenei theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT murugiahkarthik theuseofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT nutisudhakarv useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT waydabrian useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT ranasingheisuru useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT wangsisi useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT dreyerrachelp useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT chenserenei useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview
AT murugiahkarthik useofgoogletrendsinhealthcareresearchasystematicreview