Cargando…
Evaluating Uncertainty to Strengthen Epidemiologic Data for Use in Human Health Risk Assessments
Background: There is a recognized need to improve the application of epidemiologic data in human health risk assessment especially for understanding and characterizing risks from environmental and occupational exposures. Although there is uncertainty associated with the results of most epidemiologic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
NLM-Export
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25079138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1308062 |
_version_ | 1782342226829901824 |
---|---|
author | Burns, Carol J. Wright, J. Michael Pierson, Jennifer B. Bateson, Thomas F. Burstyn, Igor Goldstein, Daniel A. Klaunig, James E. Luben, Thomas J. Mihlan, Gary Ritter, Leonard Schnatter, A. Robert Symons, J. Morel Don Yi, Kun |
author_facet | Burns, Carol J. Wright, J. Michael Pierson, Jennifer B. Bateson, Thomas F. Burstyn, Igor Goldstein, Daniel A. Klaunig, James E. Luben, Thomas J. Mihlan, Gary Ritter, Leonard Schnatter, A. Robert Symons, J. Morel Don Yi, Kun |
author_sort | Burns, Carol J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: There is a recognized need to improve the application of epidemiologic data in human health risk assessment especially for understanding and characterizing risks from environmental and occupational exposures. Although there is uncertainty associated with the results of most epidemiologic studies, techniques exist to characterize uncertainty that can be applied to improve weight-of-evidence evaluations and risk characterization efforts. Methods: This report derives from a Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) workshop held in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, to discuss the utility of using epidemiologic data in risk assessments, including the use of advanced analytic methods to address sources of uncertainty. Epidemiologists, toxicologists, and risk assessors from academia, government, and industry convened to discuss uncertainty, exposure assessment, and application of analytic methods to address these challenges. Synthesis: Several recommendations emerged to help improve the utility of epidemiologic data in risk assessment. For example, improved characterization of uncertainty is needed to allow risk assessors to quantitatively assess potential sources of bias. Data are needed to facilitate this quantitative analysis, and interdisciplinary approaches will help ensure that sufficient information is collected for a thorough uncertainty evaluation. Advanced analytic methods and tools such as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and Bayesian statistical techniques can provide important insights and support interpretation of epidemiologic data. Conclusions: The discussions and recommendations from this workshop demonstrate that there are practical steps that the scientific community can adopt to strengthen epidemiologic data for decision making. Citation: Burns CJ, Wright JM, Pierson JB, Bateson TF, Burstyn I, Goldstein DA, Klaunig JE, Luben TJ, Mihlan G, Ritter L, Schnatter AR, Symons JM, Yi KD. 2014. Evaluating uncertainty to strengthen epidemiologic data for use in human health risk assessments. Environ Health Perspect 122:1160–1165; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1308062 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4216166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | NLM-Export |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42161662014-11-10 Evaluating Uncertainty to Strengthen Epidemiologic Data for Use in Human Health Risk Assessments Burns, Carol J. Wright, J. Michael Pierson, Jennifer B. Bateson, Thomas F. Burstyn, Igor Goldstein, Daniel A. Klaunig, James E. Luben, Thomas J. Mihlan, Gary Ritter, Leonard Schnatter, A. Robert Symons, J. Morel Don Yi, Kun Environ Health Perspect Commentary Background: There is a recognized need to improve the application of epidemiologic data in human health risk assessment especially for understanding and characterizing risks from environmental and occupational exposures. Although there is uncertainty associated with the results of most epidemiologic studies, techniques exist to characterize uncertainty that can be applied to improve weight-of-evidence evaluations and risk characterization efforts. Methods: This report derives from a Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) workshop held in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, to discuss the utility of using epidemiologic data in risk assessments, including the use of advanced analytic methods to address sources of uncertainty. Epidemiologists, toxicologists, and risk assessors from academia, government, and industry convened to discuss uncertainty, exposure assessment, and application of analytic methods to address these challenges. Synthesis: Several recommendations emerged to help improve the utility of epidemiologic data in risk assessment. For example, improved characterization of uncertainty is needed to allow risk assessors to quantitatively assess potential sources of bias. Data are needed to facilitate this quantitative analysis, and interdisciplinary approaches will help ensure that sufficient information is collected for a thorough uncertainty evaluation. Advanced analytic methods and tools such as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and Bayesian statistical techniques can provide important insights and support interpretation of epidemiologic data. Conclusions: The discussions and recommendations from this workshop demonstrate that there are practical steps that the scientific community can adopt to strengthen epidemiologic data for decision making. Citation: Burns CJ, Wright JM, Pierson JB, Bateson TF, Burstyn I, Goldstein DA, Klaunig JE, Luben TJ, Mihlan G, Ritter L, Schnatter AR, Symons JM, Yi KD. 2014. Evaluating uncertainty to strengthen epidemiologic data for use in human health risk assessments. Environ Health Perspect 122:1160–1165; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1308062 NLM-Export 2014-07-31 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4216166/ /pubmed/25079138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1308062 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Burns, Carol J. Wright, J. Michael Pierson, Jennifer B. Bateson, Thomas F. Burstyn, Igor Goldstein, Daniel A. Klaunig, James E. Luben, Thomas J. Mihlan, Gary Ritter, Leonard Schnatter, A. Robert Symons, J. Morel Don Yi, Kun Evaluating Uncertainty to Strengthen Epidemiologic Data for Use in Human Health Risk Assessments |
title | Evaluating Uncertainty to Strengthen Epidemiologic Data for Use in Human Health Risk Assessments |
title_full | Evaluating Uncertainty to Strengthen Epidemiologic Data for Use in Human Health Risk Assessments |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Uncertainty to Strengthen Epidemiologic Data for Use in Human Health Risk Assessments |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Uncertainty to Strengthen Epidemiologic Data for Use in Human Health Risk Assessments |
title_short | Evaluating Uncertainty to Strengthen Epidemiologic Data for Use in Human Health Risk Assessments |
title_sort | evaluating uncertainty to strengthen epidemiologic data for use in human health risk assessments |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25079138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1308062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT burnscarolj evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments AT wrightjmichael evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments AT piersonjenniferb evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments AT batesonthomasf evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments AT burstynigor evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments AT goldsteindaniela evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments AT klaunigjamese evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments AT lubenthomasj evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments AT mihlangary evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments AT ritterleonard evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments AT schnatterarobert evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments AT symonsjmorel evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments AT donyikun evaluatinguncertaintytostrengthenepidemiologicdataforuseinhumanhealthriskassessments |