Cargando…

Comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study

PURPOSE: This retrospective study compares the amount of bone resorption around implants between an autogenous tooth bone graft (AutoBT) and a synthetic bone graft after a bone-added crestally approached sinus lift with simultaneous implant placements. METHODS: In all, 37 patients participated in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Young-Kyun, Lee, Junho, Yun, Ji-Young, Yun, Pil-Young, Um, In-Woong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Periodontology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25368809
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2014.44.5.216
_version_ 1782342256738435072
author Kim, Young-Kyun
Lee, Junho
Yun, Ji-Young
Yun, Pil-Young
Um, In-Woong
author_facet Kim, Young-Kyun
Lee, Junho
Yun, Ji-Young
Yun, Pil-Young
Um, In-Woong
author_sort Kim, Young-Kyun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This retrospective study compares the amount of bone resorption around implants between an autogenous tooth bone graft (AutoBT) and a synthetic bone graft after a bone-added crestally approached sinus lift with simultaneous implant placements. METHODS: In all, 37 patients participated in this study. Seventeen patients were grouped as group I and underwent an AutoBT-added sinus lift using the crestal approach. The remaining 20 patients were grouped as group II and underwent synthetic bone grafting. Both groups received the implant placements simultaneously. Of the 37 participating patients, only 22 patients were included in the final results: Eleven patients of group I and 11 patients of group II. Before the surgery, the distance from the alveolar crest to the sinus floor was measured using panoramic radiography. After the surgery, the distance was measured again from the neck of the implant thread to the most superior border of the added graft materials. Then, the amount of sinus lift was calculated by comparing the two panoramic radiographs. After a year, a panoramic radiograph was taken to calculate the resorption of the bone graft material from the radiograph that was taken after the surgery. The significance of the resorption amount between the two types of graft materials was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The bone height was increased to an average of 4.89 mm in group I and 6.22 mm in group II. The analysis of panoramic radiographs 1 year after the surgery showed an average bone resorption of 0.76 mm and 0.53 mm, respectively. However, the degree of lifting (P=0.460) and the amount of bone-grafted material resorption (P=0.570) showed no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this limited study, AutoBT can be considered a good alternative bone graft to a synthetic bone graft in a bone-added sinus lift, when extraction is necessary prior to the surgery. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4216397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Korean Academy of Periodontology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42163972014-11-03 Comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study Kim, Young-Kyun Lee, Junho Yun, Ji-Young Yun, Pil-Young Um, In-Woong J Periodontal Implant Sci Research Article PURPOSE: This retrospective study compares the amount of bone resorption around implants between an autogenous tooth bone graft (AutoBT) and a synthetic bone graft after a bone-added crestally approached sinus lift with simultaneous implant placements. METHODS: In all, 37 patients participated in this study. Seventeen patients were grouped as group I and underwent an AutoBT-added sinus lift using the crestal approach. The remaining 20 patients were grouped as group II and underwent synthetic bone grafting. Both groups received the implant placements simultaneously. Of the 37 participating patients, only 22 patients were included in the final results: Eleven patients of group I and 11 patients of group II. Before the surgery, the distance from the alveolar crest to the sinus floor was measured using panoramic radiography. After the surgery, the distance was measured again from the neck of the implant thread to the most superior border of the added graft materials. Then, the amount of sinus lift was calculated by comparing the two panoramic radiographs. After a year, a panoramic radiograph was taken to calculate the resorption of the bone graft material from the radiograph that was taken after the surgery. The significance of the resorption amount between the two types of graft materials was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The bone height was increased to an average of 4.89 mm in group I and 6.22 mm in group II. The analysis of panoramic radiographs 1 year after the surgery showed an average bone resorption of 0.76 mm and 0.53 mm, respectively. However, the degree of lifting (P=0.460) and the amount of bone-grafted material resorption (P=0.570) showed no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this limited study, AutoBT can be considered a good alternative bone graft to a synthetic bone graft in a bone-added sinus lift, when extraction is necessary prior to the surgery. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Korean Academy of Periodontology 2014-10 2014-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4216397/ /pubmed/25368809 http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2014.44.5.216 Text en Copyright © 2014 Korean Academy of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Young-Kyun
Lee, Junho
Yun, Ji-Young
Yun, Pil-Young
Um, In-Woong
Comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study
title Comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study
title_full Comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study
title_short Comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study
title_sort comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25368809
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2014.44.5.216
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyoungkyun comparisonofautogenoustoothbonegraftandsyntheticbonegraftmaterialsusedforboneresorptionaroundimplantsaftercrestalapproachsinusliftingaretrospectivestudy
AT leejunho comparisonofautogenoustoothbonegraftandsyntheticbonegraftmaterialsusedforboneresorptionaroundimplantsaftercrestalapproachsinusliftingaretrospectivestudy
AT yunjiyoung comparisonofautogenoustoothbonegraftandsyntheticbonegraftmaterialsusedforboneresorptionaroundimplantsaftercrestalapproachsinusliftingaretrospectivestudy
AT yunpilyoung comparisonofautogenoustoothbonegraftandsyntheticbonegraftmaterialsusedforboneresorptionaroundimplantsaftercrestalapproachsinusliftingaretrospectivestudy
AT uminwoong comparisonofautogenoustoothbonegraftandsyntheticbonegraftmaterialsusedforboneresorptionaroundimplantsaftercrestalapproachsinusliftingaretrospectivestudy