A comparative evaluation of CO(2) and erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser therapy in the management of dentin hypersensitivity and assessment of mineral content

PURPOSE: Dentin hypersensitivity is a potential threat to oral health. Laser irradiation may provide reliable and reproducible treatment but remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of CO(2) or erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser therapy, and to assess mineral content. METHODS: Eighteen human single-rooted teeth affected with advanced periodontitis were obtained. Buccal and lingual surfaces were planed to form 36 specimens. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid gel (24%) was applied to remove the smear layer and simulate hypersensitive teeth. The experimental groups were: group 1, control (no irradiation); group 2, CO(2) laser (repetitive pulsed mode, 2 W, 2.7 J/cm(2)); and group 3, Er:YAG laser (slight contact mode, 40 mJ/pulse and 10 Hz). To evaluate dentinal tubule occlusion, six specimens per group (2-mm thickness) were prepared and observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for calculation of the occlusion percentage. To evaluate the mineral content, six specimens per group (0.6-mm thickness) were used, and then the levels of Ca, K, Mg, Na, and P were measured by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry. In addition, the surface temperature of the specimens during laser irradiation was analyzed by a thermograph. RESULTS: The SEM photomicrographs indicated melted areas around exposed dentinal tubules and a significantly greater percentage of tubular occlusion in the CO(2) and Er:YAG laser groups than the control, and in the Er:YAG group than the CO(2) laser group. In addition, no significant differences were noted among the experimental groups for the mineral elements analyzed. The CO(2) laser group showed an evident thermal effect compared to the Er:YAG group. CONCLUSIONS: CO(2) and Er:YAG laser are effective in treating dentin hypersensitivity and reducing its symptoms. However, the Er:YAG laser has a more significant effect; thus, it may constitute a useful conditioning item. Furthermore, neither CO(2) nor Er:YAG lasers affected the compositional structure of the mineral content. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]