Cargando…

Volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed mode during one-lung ventilation

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in airway pressure and arterial oxygenation between ventilation modes during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. METHODS: We enrolled 27 patients for thoracic surgery with OLV in the lateral decubitu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Seok Young, Jung, Jin Yong, Cho, Min-Su, Kim, Jong Hae, Ryu, Tae Ha, Kim, Bong IL
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25368784
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.67.4.258
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in airway pressure and arterial oxygenation between ventilation modes during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. METHODS: We enrolled 27 patients for thoracic surgery with OLV in the lateral decubitus position. The subjects received various modes of ventilation in random sequences during surgery, including volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed (PCV-VG) with a tidal volume (TV) of 8 ml/kg of actual body weight. Target-controlled infusion (TCI) with propofol and remifentanil was used for anesthesia induction and maintenance. After double-lumen endobronchial tube (DLT) insertion, the proper positioning of the DLT was assessed using a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Peak inspiratory pressure (P(peak)), exhaled TV, and arterial blood gas were measured 30 min after each ventilation mode. RESULTS: P(peak) was significantly reduced with the PCV-VG mode (19.6 ± 2.5 cmH(2)O) compared with the VCV mode (23.2 ± 3.1 cmH(2)O) (P < 0.000). However, no difference in arterial oxygen tension was noted between the groups (PCV-VG, 375.8 ± 145.1 mmHg; VCV, 328.1 ± 123.7 mmHg) (P = 0.063). The exhaled TV was also significantly increased in PCV-VG compared with VCV (451.4 ± 85.4 vs. 443.9 ± 85.9 ml; P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: During OLV in patients with normal lung function, although PCV-VG did not provide significantly improved arterial oxygen tension compared with VCV, PCV-VG provided significantly attenuated airway pressure despite significantly increased exhaled TV compared with VCV.