Cargando…
Comparison of two fluid warming devices for maintaining body core temperature during living donor liver transplantation: Level 1 H-1000 vs. Fluid Management System 2000
BACKGROUND: Rapid fluid warming has been a cardinal measure to maintain normothermia during fluid resuscitation of hypovolemic patients. A previous laboratory simulation study with different fluid infusion rates showed that a fluid warmer using magnetic induction is superior to a warmer using counte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25368785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.67.4.264 |
_version_ | 1782342306899165184 |
---|---|
author | Han, Sangbin Choi, Junghee Ko, Justin Sangwook Gwak, Misook Lee, Suk-Koo Kim, Gaab-Soo |
author_facet | Han, Sangbin Choi, Junghee Ko, Justin Sangwook Gwak, Misook Lee, Suk-Koo Kim, Gaab-Soo |
author_sort | Han, Sangbin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rapid fluid warming has been a cardinal measure to maintain normothermia during fluid resuscitation of hypovolemic patients. A previous laboratory simulation study with different fluid infusion rates showed that a fluid warmer using magnetic induction is superior to a warmer using countercurrent heat exchange. We tested whether the simulation-based result is translated into the clinical liver transplantation. METHODS: Two hundred twenty recipients who underwent living donor liver transplantation between April 2009 and October 2011 were initially screened. Seventeen recipients given a magnetic induction warmer (FMS2000) were matched 1 : 1 with those given a countercurrent heat exchange warmer (Level-1 H-1000) based on propensity score. Matched variables included age, gender, body mass index, model for end-stage liver disease score, graft size and time under anesthesia. Core temperatures were taken at predetermined time points. RESULTS: Level-1 and FMS groups had comparable core temperature throughout the surgery from skin incision, the beginning/end of the anhepatic phase to skin closure. (P = 0.165, repeated measures ANOVA). The degree of core temperature changes within the dissection, anhepatic and postreperfusion phase were also comparable between the two groups. The minimum intraoperative core temperature was also comparable (Level 1, 35.6℃ vs. FMS, 35.4℃, P = 0.122). CONCLUSIONS: A countercurrent heat exchange warmer and magnetic induction warmer displayed comparable function regarding the maintenance of core temperature and prevention of hypothermia during living donor liver transplantation. The applicability of the two devices in liver transplantation needs to be evaluated in various populations and clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4216789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42167892014-11-03 Comparison of two fluid warming devices for maintaining body core temperature during living donor liver transplantation: Level 1 H-1000 vs. Fluid Management System 2000 Han, Sangbin Choi, Junghee Ko, Justin Sangwook Gwak, Misook Lee, Suk-Koo Kim, Gaab-Soo Korean J Anesthesiol Clinical Research Article BACKGROUND: Rapid fluid warming has been a cardinal measure to maintain normothermia during fluid resuscitation of hypovolemic patients. A previous laboratory simulation study with different fluid infusion rates showed that a fluid warmer using magnetic induction is superior to a warmer using countercurrent heat exchange. We tested whether the simulation-based result is translated into the clinical liver transplantation. METHODS: Two hundred twenty recipients who underwent living donor liver transplantation between April 2009 and October 2011 were initially screened. Seventeen recipients given a magnetic induction warmer (FMS2000) were matched 1 : 1 with those given a countercurrent heat exchange warmer (Level-1 H-1000) based on propensity score. Matched variables included age, gender, body mass index, model for end-stage liver disease score, graft size and time under anesthesia. Core temperatures were taken at predetermined time points. RESULTS: Level-1 and FMS groups had comparable core temperature throughout the surgery from skin incision, the beginning/end of the anhepatic phase to skin closure. (P = 0.165, repeated measures ANOVA). The degree of core temperature changes within the dissection, anhepatic and postreperfusion phase were also comparable between the two groups. The minimum intraoperative core temperature was also comparable (Level 1, 35.6℃ vs. FMS, 35.4℃, P = 0.122). CONCLUSIONS: A countercurrent heat exchange warmer and magnetic induction warmer displayed comparable function regarding the maintenance of core temperature and prevention of hypothermia during living donor liver transplantation. The applicability of the two devices in liver transplantation needs to be evaluated in various populations and clinical settings. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2014-10 2014-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4216789/ /pubmed/25368785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.67.4.264 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Article Han, Sangbin Choi, Junghee Ko, Justin Sangwook Gwak, Misook Lee, Suk-Koo Kim, Gaab-Soo Comparison of two fluid warming devices for maintaining body core temperature during living donor liver transplantation: Level 1 H-1000 vs. Fluid Management System 2000 |
title | Comparison of two fluid warming devices for maintaining body core temperature during living donor liver transplantation: Level 1 H-1000 vs. Fluid Management System 2000 |
title_full | Comparison of two fluid warming devices for maintaining body core temperature during living donor liver transplantation: Level 1 H-1000 vs. Fluid Management System 2000 |
title_fullStr | Comparison of two fluid warming devices for maintaining body core temperature during living donor liver transplantation: Level 1 H-1000 vs. Fluid Management System 2000 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of two fluid warming devices for maintaining body core temperature during living donor liver transplantation: Level 1 H-1000 vs. Fluid Management System 2000 |
title_short | Comparison of two fluid warming devices for maintaining body core temperature during living donor liver transplantation: Level 1 H-1000 vs. Fluid Management System 2000 |
title_sort | comparison of two fluid warming devices for maintaining body core temperature during living donor liver transplantation: level 1 h-1000 vs. fluid management system 2000 |
topic | Clinical Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25368785 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.67.4.264 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansangbin comparisonoftwofluidwarmingdevicesformaintainingbodycoretemperatureduringlivingdonorlivertransplantationlevel1h1000vsfluidmanagementsystem2000 AT choijunghee comparisonoftwofluidwarmingdevicesformaintainingbodycoretemperatureduringlivingdonorlivertransplantationlevel1h1000vsfluidmanagementsystem2000 AT kojustinsangwook comparisonoftwofluidwarmingdevicesformaintainingbodycoretemperatureduringlivingdonorlivertransplantationlevel1h1000vsfluidmanagementsystem2000 AT gwakmisook comparisonoftwofluidwarmingdevicesformaintainingbodycoretemperatureduringlivingdonorlivertransplantationlevel1h1000vsfluidmanagementsystem2000 AT leesukkoo comparisonoftwofluidwarmingdevicesformaintainingbodycoretemperatureduringlivingdonorlivertransplantationlevel1h1000vsfluidmanagementsystem2000 AT kimgaabsoo comparisonoftwofluidwarmingdevicesformaintainingbodycoretemperatureduringlivingdonorlivertransplantationlevel1h1000vsfluidmanagementsystem2000 |