Cargando…
Electronic data capture in a rural African setting: evaluating experiences with different systems in Malawi
BACKGROUND: As hardware for electronic data capture (EDC), such as smartphones or tablets, becomes cheaper and more widely available, the potential for using such hardware as data capture tools in routine healthcare and research is increasing. OBJECTIVE: We aim to highlight the advantages and disadv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Co-Action Publishing
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25363364 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25878 |
_version_ | 1782342310978125824 |
---|---|
author | King, Carina Hall, Jenny Banda, Masford Beard, James Bird, Jon Kazembe, Peter Fottrell, Ed |
author_facet | King, Carina Hall, Jenny Banda, Masford Beard, James Bird, Jon Kazembe, Peter Fottrell, Ed |
author_sort | King, Carina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As hardware for electronic data capture (EDC), such as smartphones or tablets, becomes cheaper and more widely available, the potential for using such hardware as data capture tools in routine healthcare and research is increasing. OBJECTIVE: We aim to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of four EDC systems being used simultaneously in rural Malawi: two for Android devices (CommCare and ODK Collect), one for PALM and Windows OS (Pendragon), and a custom-built application for Android (Mobile InterVA – MIVA). DESIGN: We report on the personal field and development experience of fieldworkers, project managers, and EDC system developers. RESULTS: Fieldworkers preferred using EDC to paper-based systems, although some struggled with the technology at first. Highlighted features include in-built skip patterns for all systems, and specifically the ‘case’ function that CommCare offers. MIVA as a standalone app required considerably more time and expertise than the other systems to create and could not be customised for our specific research needs; however, it facilitates standardised routine data collection. CommCare and ODK Collect both have user-friendly web-interfaces for form development and good technical support. CommCare requires Internet to build an application and download it to a device, whereas all steps can be done offline with ODK Collect, a desirable feature in low connectivity settings. Pendragon required more complex programming of logic, using a Microsoft Access application, and generally had less technical support. Start-up costs varied between systems, and all were considered more expensive than setting up a paper-based system; however running costs were generally low and therefore thought to be cost-effective over the course of our projects. CONCLUSIONS: EDC offers many opportunities for efficient data collection, but brings some issues requiring consideration when designing a study; the decision of which hardware and software to use should be informed by the aim of data collection, budget, and local circumstances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4216812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Co-Action Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42168122014-11-17 Electronic data capture in a rural African setting: evaluating experiences with different systems in Malawi King, Carina Hall, Jenny Banda, Masford Beard, James Bird, Jon Kazembe, Peter Fottrell, Ed Glob Health Action Methods Forum BACKGROUND: As hardware for electronic data capture (EDC), such as smartphones or tablets, becomes cheaper and more widely available, the potential for using such hardware as data capture tools in routine healthcare and research is increasing. OBJECTIVE: We aim to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of four EDC systems being used simultaneously in rural Malawi: two for Android devices (CommCare and ODK Collect), one for PALM and Windows OS (Pendragon), and a custom-built application for Android (Mobile InterVA – MIVA). DESIGN: We report on the personal field and development experience of fieldworkers, project managers, and EDC system developers. RESULTS: Fieldworkers preferred using EDC to paper-based systems, although some struggled with the technology at first. Highlighted features include in-built skip patterns for all systems, and specifically the ‘case’ function that CommCare offers. MIVA as a standalone app required considerably more time and expertise than the other systems to create and could not be customised for our specific research needs; however, it facilitates standardised routine data collection. CommCare and ODK Collect both have user-friendly web-interfaces for form development and good technical support. CommCare requires Internet to build an application and download it to a device, whereas all steps can be done offline with ODK Collect, a desirable feature in low connectivity settings. Pendragon required more complex programming of logic, using a Microsoft Access application, and generally had less technical support. Start-up costs varied between systems, and all were considered more expensive than setting up a paper-based system; however running costs were generally low and therefore thought to be cost-effective over the course of our projects. CONCLUSIONS: EDC offers many opportunities for efficient data collection, but brings some issues requiring consideration when designing a study; the decision of which hardware and software to use should be informed by the aim of data collection, budget, and local circumstances. Co-Action Publishing 2014-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4216812/ /pubmed/25363364 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25878 Text en © 2014 Carina King et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methods Forum King, Carina Hall, Jenny Banda, Masford Beard, James Bird, Jon Kazembe, Peter Fottrell, Ed Electronic data capture in a rural African setting: evaluating experiences with different systems in Malawi |
title | Electronic data capture in a rural African setting: evaluating experiences with different systems in Malawi |
title_full | Electronic data capture in a rural African setting: evaluating experiences with different systems in Malawi |
title_fullStr | Electronic data capture in a rural African setting: evaluating experiences with different systems in Malawi |
title_full_unstemmed | Electronic data capture in a rural African setting: evaluating experiences with different systems in Malawi |
title_short | Electronic data capture in a rural African setting: evaluating experiences with different systems in Malawi |
title_sort | electronic data capture in a rural african setting: evaluating experiences with different systems in malawi |
topic | Methods Forum |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25363364 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.25878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kingcarina electronicdatacaptureinaruralafricansettingevaluatingexperienceswithdifferentsystemsinmalawi AT halljenny electronicdatacaptureinaruralafricansettingevaluatingexperienceswithdifferentsystemsinmalawi AT bandamasford electronicdatacaptureinaruralafricansettingevaluatingexperienceswithdifferentsystemsinmalawi AT beardjames electronicdatacaptureinaruralafricansettingevaluatingexperienceswithdifferentsystemsinmalawi AT birdjon electronicdatacaptureinaruralafricansettingevaluatingexperienceswithdifferentsystemsinmalawi AT kazembepeter electronicdatacaptureinaruralafricansettingevaluatingexperienceswithdifferentsystemsinmalawi AT fottrelled electronicdatacaptureinaruralafricansettingevaluatingexperienceswithdifferentsystemsinmalawi |