Cargando…

The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis

BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). Morbidity, mortality and pathological outcomes may be superior in academic institutions. One explanation may be the involvement of oncology fellowship trained urologists within academic institutions. The literatu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nayak, Jasmir G, Drachenberg, Darrel E, Mau, Elke, Suderman, Derek, Bucher, Oliver, Lambert, Pascal, Quon, Harvey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25339410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-82
_version_ 1782342317816938496
author Nayak, Jasmir G
Drachenberg, Darrel E
Mau, Elke
Suderman, Derek
Bucher, Oliver
Lambert, Pascal
Quon, Harvey
author_facet Nayak, Jasmir G
Drachenberg, Darrel E
Mau, Elke
Suderman, Derek
Bucher, Oliver
Lambert, Pascal
Quon, Harvey
author_sort Nayak, Jasmir G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). Morbidity, mortality and pathological outcomes may be superior in academic institutions. One explanation may be the involvement of oncology fellowship trained urologists within academic institutions. The literature examining pathological outcomes often lacks individual surgeon data. The objective of this study was to compare pathological outcomes following RP between fellowship trained and non-fellowship trained urologists. METHODS: Population-based, retrospective chart review of men diagnosed with PCa between 2003 and 2008, the majority treated with open approach RP (>99%). Pathological outcomes were compared between oncology fellowship trained academic (FTA), non-fellowship trained academic (NFTA) and non-academic (NA) urologists. Relationships with pathological outcomes were examined utilizing multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: 83.1% of eligible patients were included in our analysis resulting in 1075 patients. In multivariable analysis, surgeon group was an independent predictor of positive surgical margin (PSM) (p < 0.0001). NFTA and NA urologists were more likely to have PSM compared to FTA urologists (OR 2.50; 95% CI: 1.44 - 4.35 and OR 2.10; 95% CI: 1.53 - 2.88, respectively). However, the proportion of PSM between NFTA and NA urologists was not significant (p = 0.492). In addition, pathological stage (p = 0.0004), Gleason sum (p < 0.0001), and surgeon volume (p = 0.017) were associated with PSM. Limitations include retrospective design and lack of clinical and functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Uro-oncology fellowship trained surgeons had significantly lower rates of PSM than non-fellowship trained surgeons in this population based cohort. This study demonstrates the importance of surgeon-related variables on pathological outcomes and highlights the value of additional urologic oncology fellowship training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4216843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42168432014-11-04 The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis Nayak, Jasmir G Drachenberg, Darrel E Mau, Elke Suderman, Derek Bucher, Oliver Lambert, Pascal Quon, Harvey BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a common treatment for prostate cancer (PCa). Morbidity, mortality and pathological outcomes may be superior in academic institutions. One explanation may be the involvement of oncology fellowship trained urologists within academic institutions. The literature examining pathological outcomes often lacks individual surgeon data. The objective of this study was to compare pathological outcomes following RP between fellowship trained and non-fellowship trained urologists. METHODS: Population-based, retrospective chart review of men diagnosed with PCa between 2003 and 2008, the majority treated with open approach RP (>99%). Pathological outcomes were compared between oncology fellowship trained academic (FTA), non-fellowship trained academic (NFTA) and non-academic (NA) urologists. Relationships with pathological outcomes were examined utilizing multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: 83.1% of eligible patients were included in our analysis resulting in 1075 patients. In multivariable analysis, surgeon group was an independent predictor of positive surgical margin (PSM) (p < 0.0001). NFTA and NA urologists were more likely to have PSM compared to FTA urologists (OR 2.50; 95% CI: 1.44 - 4.35 and OR 2.10; 95% CI: 1.53 - 2.88, respectively). However, the proportion of PSM between NFTA and NA urologists was not significant (p = 0.492). In addition, pathological stage (p = 0.0004), Gleason sum (p < 0.0001), and surgeon volume (p = 0.017) were associated with PSM. Limitations include retrospective design and lack of clinical and functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Uro-oncology fellowship trained surgeons had significantly lower rates of PSM than non-fellowship trained surgeons in this population based cohort. This study demonstrates the importance of surgeon-related variables on pathological outcomes and highlights the value of additional urologic oncology fellowship training. BioMed Central 2014-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4216843/ /pubmed/25339410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-82 Text en © Nayak et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nayak, Jasmir G
Drachenberg, Darrel E
Mau, Elke
Suderman, Derek
Bucher, Oliver
Lambert, Pascal
Quon, Harvey
The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis
title The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis
title_full The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis
title_fullStr The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis
title_full_unstemmed The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis
title_short The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis
title_sort impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25339410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-82
work_keys_str_mv AT nayakjasmirg theimpactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT drachenbergdarrele theimpactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT mauelke theimpactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT sudermanderek theimpactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT bucheroliver theimpactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT lambertpascal theimpactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT quonharvey theimpactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT nayakjasmirg impactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT drachenbergdarrele impactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT mauelke impactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT sudermanderek impactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT bucheroliver impactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT lambertpascal impactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis
AT quonharvey impactoffellowshiptrainingonpathologicaloutcomesfollowingradicalprostatectomyapopulationbasedanalysis