Cargando…

Individualising dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: the IDEAL-PCI registry

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of individualising dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in an all-comers population, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. SETTING: Tertiary care single centre registry. PARTICIPANTS: 1008...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Christ, Günter, Siller-Matula, Jolanta M, Francesconi, Marcel, Dechant, Cornelia, Grohs, Katharina, Podczeck-Schweighofer, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25361837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005781
_version_ 1782342323468763136
author Christ, Günter
Siller-Matula, Jolanta M
Francesconi, Marcel
Dechant, Cornelia
Grohs, Katharina
Podczeck-Schweighofer, Andrea
author_facet Christ, Günter
Siller-Matula, Jolanta M
Francesconi, Marcel
Dechant, Cornelia
Grohs, Katharina
Podczeck-Schweighofer, Andrea
author_sort Christ, Günter
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of individualising dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in an all-comers population, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. SETTING: Tertiary care single centre registry. PARTICIPANTS: 1008 consecutive PCI patients with stent implantation, without exclusion criteria. INTERVENTION: Peri-interventional individualisation of DAPT, guided by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), to overcome high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) to ADP-induced (≥50 U) and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced aggregation (>35 U). OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was definite stent thrombosis (ST) at 30 days. The primary safety end point was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding. Secondary end points were probable ST, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death and the combined end point: major cardiac adverse event (MACE). RESULTS: 53% of patients presented with acute coronary syndrome (9% STEMI, 44% non-ST-elevation). HPR to ADP after 600 mg clopidogrel loading occurred in 30% of patients (73±19 U vs 28±11 U; p<0.001) and was treated by prasugrel or ticagrelor (73%), or clopidogrel (27%) reloading (22±12 U; p<0.001). HPR to ADP after prasugrel loading occurred in 2% of patients (82±26 U vs 19±10 U; p<0.001) and was treated with ticagrelor (34±15 U; p=0.02). HPR to AA occurred in 9% of patients with a significant higher proportion in patients with HPR to ADP (22% vs 4%, p<0.001) and was treated with aspirin reloading. Definite ST occurred in 0.09% of patients (n=1); probable ST, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death and MACE occurred in 0.19% (n=2), 0.09% (n=1) and 1.8% (n=18) of patients. TIMI major and minor bleeding did not differ between patients without HPR and individualised patients (2.6% for both). CONCLUSIONS: Individualisation of DAPT with MEA minimises early thrombotic events in an all-comers PCI population to an unreported degree without increasing bleeding. A randomised multicentre trial utilising MEA seems warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01515345.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4216867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42168672014-11-04 Individualising dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: the IDEAL-PCI registry Christ, Günter Siller-Matula, Jolanta M Francesconi, Marcel Dechant, Cornelia Grohs, Katharina Podczeck-Schweighofer, Andrea BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical utility of individualising dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in an all-comers population, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. SETTING: Tertiary care single centre registry. PARTICIPANTS: 1008 consecutive PCI patients with stent implantation, without exclusion criteria. INTERVENTION: Peri-interventional individualisation of DAPT, guided by multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), to overcome high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) to ADP-induced (≥50 U) and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced aggregation (>35 U). OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was definite stent thrombosis (ST) at 30 days. The primary safety end point was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding. Secondary end points were probable ST, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death and the combined end point: major cardiac adverse event (MACE). RESULTS: 53% of patients presented with acute coronary syndrome (9% STEMI, 44% non-ST-elevation). HPR to ADP after 600 mg clopidogrel loading occurred in 30% of patients (73±19 U vs 28±11 U; p<0.001) and was treated by prasugrel or ticagrelor (73%), or clopidogrel (27%) reloading (22±12 U; p<0.001). HPR to ADP after prasugrel loading occurred in 2% of patients (82±26 U vs 19±10 U; p<0.001) and was treated with ticagrelor (34±15 U; p=0.02). HPR to AA occurred in 9% of patients with a significant higher proportion in patients with HPR to ADP (22% vs 4%, p<0.001) and was treated with aspirin reloading. Definite ST occurred in 0.09% of patients (n=1); probable ST, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death and MACE occurred in 0.19% (n=2), 0.09% (n=1) and 1.8% (n=18) of patients. TIMI major and minor bleeding did not differ between patients without HPR and individualised patients (2.6% for both). CONCLUSIONS: Individualisation of DAPT with MEA minimises early thrombotic events in an all-comers PCI population to an unreported degree without increasing bleeding. A randomised multicentre trial utilising MEA seems warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT01515345. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4216867/ /pubmed/25361837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005781 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Christ, Günter
Siller-Matula, Jolanta M
Francesconi, Marcel
Dechant, Cornelia
Grohs, Katharina
Podczeck-Schweighofer, Andrea
Individualising dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: the IDEAL-PCI registry
title Individualising dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: the IDEAL-PCI registry
title_full Individualising dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: the IDEAL-PCI registry
title_fullStr Individualising dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: the IDEAL-PCI registry
title_full_unstemmed Individualising dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: the IDEAL-PCI registry
title_short Individualising dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: the IDEAL-PCI registry
title_sort individualising dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: the ideal-pci registry
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25361837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005781
work_keys_str_mv AT christgunter individualisingdualantiplatelettherapyafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontheidealpciregistry
AT sillermatulajolantam individualisingdualantiplatelettherapyafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontheidealpciregistry
AT francesconimarcel individualisingdualantiplatelettherapyafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontheidealpciregistry
AT dechantcornelia individualisingdualantiplatelettherapyafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontheidealpciregistry
AT grohskatharina individualisingdualantiplatelettherapyafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontheidealpciregistry
AT podczeckschweighoferandrea individualisingdualantiplatelettherapyafterpercutaneouscoronaryinterventiontheidealpciregistry