Cargando…

Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal birth outcomes and morbidities associated with the intention to give birth in two freestanding midwifery units and two tertiary-level maternity units in New South Wales, Australia. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 494 women who intended to g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monk, Amy, Tracy, Mark, Foureur, Maralyn, Grigg, Celia, Tracy, Sally
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25361840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006252
_version_ 1782342323693158400
author Monk, Amy
Tracy, Mark
Foureur, Maralyn
Grigg, Celia
Tracy, Sally
author_facet Monk, Amy
Tracy, Mark
Foureur, Maralyn
Grigg, Celia
Tracy, Sally
author_sort Monk, Amy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal birth outcomes and morbidities associated with the intention to give birth in two freestanding midwifery units and two tertiary-level maternity units in New South Wales, Australia. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 494 women who intended to give birth at freestanding midwifery units and 3157 women who intended to give birth at tertiary-level maternity units. Participants had low risk, singleton pregnancies and were at less than 28(+0) weeks gestation at the time of booking. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were mode of birth, Apgar score of less than 7 at 5 min and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery. Secondary outcomes were onset of labour, analgesia, blood loss, management of third stage of labour, perineal trauma, transfer, neonatal resuscitation, breastfeeding, gestational age at birth, birth weight, severe morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Women who planned to give birth at a freestanding midwifery unit were significantly more likely to have a spontaneous vaginal birth (AOR 1.57; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.06) and significantly less likely to have a caesarean section (AOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.88). There was no significant difference in the AOR of 5 min Apgar scores, however, babies from the freestanding midwifery unit group were significantly less likely to be admitted to neonatal intensive care or special care nursery (AOR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.91). Analysis of secondary outcomes indicated that planning to give birth in a freestanding midwifery unit was associated with similar or reduced odds of intrapartum interventions and similar or improved odds of indicators of neonatal well-being. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the provision of care in freestanding midwifery units as an alternative to tertiary-level maternity units for women with low risk pregnancies at the time of booking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4216868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42168682014-11-04 Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia Monk, Amy Tracy, Mark Foureur, Maralyn Grigg, Celia Tracy, Sally BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal birth outcomes and morbidities associated with the intention to give birth in two freestanding midwifery units and two tertiary-level maternity units in New South Wales, Australia. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 494 women who intended to give birth at freestanding midwifery units and 3157 women who intended to give birth at tertiary-level maternity units. Participants had low risk, singleton pregnancies and were at less than 28(+0) weeks gestation at the time of booking. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were mode of birth, Apgar score of less than 7 at 5 min and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery. Secondary outcomes were onset of labour, analgesia, blood loss, management of third stage of labour, perineal trauma, transfer, neonatal resuscitation, breastfeeding, gestational age at birth, birth weight, severe morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Women who planned to give birth at a freestanding midwifery unit were significantly more likely to have a spontaneous vaginal birth (AOR 1.57; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.06) and significantly less likely to have a caesarean section (AOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.88). There was no significant difference in the AOR of 5 min Apgar scores, however, babies from the freestanding midwifery unit group were significantly less likely to be admitted to neonatal intensive care or special care nursery (AOR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.91). Analysis of secondary outcomes indicated that planning to give birth in a freestanding midwifery unit was associated with similar or reduced odds of intrapartum interventions and similar or improved odds of indicators of neonatal well-being. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the provision of care in freestanding midwifery units as an alternative to tertiary-level maternity units for women with low risk pregnancies at the time of booking. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4216868/ /pubmed/25361840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006252 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Monk, Amy
Tracy, Mark
Foureur, Maralyn
Grigg, Celia
Tracy, Sally
Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia
title Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia
title_full Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia
title_fullStr Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia
title_short Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia
title_sort evaluating midwifery units (emu): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in new south wales, australia
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25361840
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006252
work_keys_str_mv AT monkamy evaluatingmidwiferyunitsemuaprospectivecohortstudyoffreestandingmidwiferyunitsinnewsouthwalesaustralia
AT tracymark evaluatingmidwiferyunitsemuaprospectivecohortstudyoffreestandingmidwiferyunitsinnewsouthwalesaustralia
AT foureurmaralyn evaluatingmidwiferyunitsemuaprospectivecohortstudyoffreestandingmidwiferyunitsinnewsouthwalesaustralia
AT griggcelia evaluatingmidwiferyunitsemuaprospectivecohortstudyoffreestandingmidwiferyunitsinnewsouthwalesaustralia
AT tracysally evaluatingmidwiferyunitsemuaprospectivecohortstudyoffreestandingmidwiferyunitsinnewsouthwalesaustralia