Cargando…
Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia
OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal birth outcomes and morbidities associated with the intention to give birth in two freestanding midwifery units and two tertiary-level maternity units in New South Wales, Australia. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 494 women who intended to g...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25361840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006252 |
_version_ | 1782342323693158400 |
---|---|
author | Monk, Amy Tracy, Mark Foureur, Maralyn Grigg, Celia Tracy, Sally |
author_facet | Monk, Amy Tracy, Mark Foureur, Maralyn Grigg, Celia Tracy, Sally |
author_sort | Monk, Amy |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal birth outcomes and morbidities associated with the intention to give birth in two freestanding midwifery units and two tertiary-level maternity units in New South Wales, Australia. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 494 women who intended to give birth at freestanding midwifery units and 3157 women who intended to give birth at tertiary-level maternity units. Participants had low risk, singleton pregnancies and were at less than 28(+0) weeks gestation at the time of booking. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were mode of birth, Apgar score of less than 7 at 5 min and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery. Secondary outcomes were onset of labour, analgesia, blood loss, management of third stage of labour, perineal trauma, transfer, neonatal resuscitation, breastfeeding, gestational age at birth, birth weight, severe morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Women who planned to give birth at a freestanding midwifery unit were significantly more likely to have a spontaneous vaginal birth (AOR 1.57; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.06) and significantly less likely to have a caesarean section (AOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.88). There was no significant difference in the AOR of 5 min Apgar scores, however, babies from the freestanding midwifery unit group were significantly less likely to be admitted to neonatal intensive care or special care nursery (AOR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.91). Analysis of secondary outcomes indicated that planning to give birth in a freestanding midwifery unit was associated with similar or reduced odds of intrapartum interventions and similar or improved odds of indicators of neonatal well-being. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the provision of care in freestanding midwifery units as an alternative to tertiary-level maternity units for women with low risk pregnancies at the time of booking. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4216868 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42168682014-11-04 Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia Monk, Amy Tracy, Mark Foureur, Maralyn Grigg, Celia Tracy, Sally BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal birth outcomes and morbidities associated with the intention to give birth in two freestanding midwifery units and two tertiary-level maternity units in New South Wales, Australia. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 494 women who intended to give birth at freestanding midwifery units and 3157 women who intended to give birth at tertiary-level maternity units. Participants had low risk, singleton pregnancies and were at less than 28(+0) weeks gestation at the time of booking. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were mode of birth, Apgar score of less than 7 at 5 min and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery. Secondary outcomes were onset of labour, analgesia, blood loss, management of third stage of labour, perineal trauma, transfer, neonatal resuscitation, breastfeeding, gestational age at birth, birth weight, severe morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Women who planned to give birth at a freestanding midwifery unit were significantly more likely to have a spontaneous vaginal birth (AOR 1.57; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.06) and significantly less likely to have a caesarean section (AOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.88). There was no significant difference in the AOR of 5 min Apgar scores, however, babies from the freestanding midwifery unit group were significantly less likely to be admitted to neonatal intensive care or special care nursery (AOR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.91). Analysis of secondary outcomes indicated that planning to give birth in a freestanding midwifery unit was associated with similar or reduced odds of intrapartum interventions and similar or improved odds of indicators of neonatal well-being. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support the provision of care in freestanding midwifery units as an alternative to tertiary-level maternity units for women with low risk pregnancies at the time of booking. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4216868/ /pubmed/25361840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006252 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Monk, Amy Tracy, Mark Foureur, Maralyn Grigg, Celia Tracy, Sally Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia |
title | Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia |
title_full | Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia |
title_short | Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia |
title_sort | evaluating midwifery units (emu): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in new south wales, australia |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216868/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25361840 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006252 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT monkamy evaluatingmidwiferyunitsemuaprospectivecohortstudyoffreestandingmidwiferyunitsinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT tracymark evaluatingmidwiferyunitsemuaprospectivecohortstudyoffreestandingmidwiferyunitsinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT foureurmaralyn evaluatingmidwiferyunitsemuaprospectivecohortstudyoffreestandingmidwiferyunitsinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT griggcelia evaluatingmidwiferyunitsemuaprospectivecohortstudyoffreestandingmidwiferyunitsinnewsouthwalesaustralia AT tracysally evaluatingmidwiferyunitsemuaprospectivecohortstudyoffreestandingmidwiferyunitsinnewsouthwalesaustralia |