Cargando…

Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition

Mutational heterogeneity must be taken into account when reconstructing evolutionary histories, calibrating molecular clocks, and predicting links between genes and disease. Selective pressures and various DNA transactions have been invoked to explain the heterogeneous distribution of genetic variat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lujan, Scott A., Clausen, Anders R., Clark, Alan B., MacAlpine, Heather K., MacAlpine, David M., Malc, Ewa P., Mieczkowski, Piotr A., Burkholder, Adam B., Fargo, David C., Gordenin, Dmitry A., Kunkel, Thomas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25217194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.178335.114
_version_ 1782342327693475840
author Lujan, Scott A.
Clausen, Anders R.
Clark, Alan B.
MacAlpine, Heather K.
MacAlpine, David M.
Malc, Ewa P.
Mieczkowski, Piotr A.
Burkholder, Adam B.
Fargo, David C.
Gordenin, Dmitry A.
Kunkel, Thomas A.
author_facet Lujan, Scott A.
Clausen, Anders R.
Clark, Alan B.
MacAlpine, Heather K.
MacAlpine, David M.
Malc, Ewa P.
Mieczkowski, Piotr A.
Burkholder, Adam B.
Fargo, David C.
Gordenin, Dmitry A.
Kunkel, Thomas A.
author_sort Lujan, Scott A.
collection PubMed
description Mutational heterogeneity must be taken into account when reconstructing evolutionary histories, calibrating molecular clocks, and predicting links between genes and disease. Selective pressures and various DNA transactions have been invoked to explain the heterogeneous distribution of genetic variation between species, within populations, and in tissue-specific tumors. To examine relationships between such heterogeneity and variations in leading- and lagging-strand replication fidelity and mismatch repair, we accumulated 40,000 spontaneous mutations in eight diploid yeast strains in the absence of selective pressure. We found that replicase error rates vary by fork direction, coding state, nucleosome proximity, and sequence context. Further, error rates and DNA mismatch repair efficiency both vary by mismatch type, responsible polymerase, replication time, and replication origin proximity. Mutation patterns implicate replication infidelity as one driver of variation in somatic and germline evolution, suggest mechanisms of mutual modulation of genome stability and composition, and predict future observations in specific cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4216917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42169172015-05-01 Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition Lujan, Scott A. Clausen, Anders R. Clark, Alan B. MacAlpine, Heather K. MacAlpine, David M. Malc, Ewa P. Mieczkowski, Piotr A. Burkholder, Adam B. Fargo, David C. Gordenin, Dmitry A. Kunkel, Thomas A. Genome Res Research Mutational heterogeneity must be taken into account when reconstructing evolutionary histories, calibrating molecular clocks, and predicting links between genes and disease. Selective pressures and various DNA transactions have been invoked to explain the heterogeneous distribution of genetic variation between species, within populations, and in tissue-specific tumors. To examine relationships between such heterogeneity and variations in leading- and lagging-strand replication fidelity and mismatch repair, we accumulated 40,000 spontaneous mutations in eight diploid yeast strains in the absence of selective pressure. We found that replicase error rates vary by fork direction, coding state, nucleosome proximity, and sequence context. Further, error rates and DNA mismatch repair efficiency both vary by mismatch type, responsible polymerase, replication time, and replication origin proximity. Mutation patterns implicate replication infidelity as one driver of variation in somatic and germline evolution, suggest mechanisms of mutual modulation of genome stability and composition, and predict future observations in specific cancers. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4216917/ /pubmed/25217194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.178335.114 Text en © 2014 Lujan et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first six months after the full-issue publication date (see http://genome.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After six months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Lujan, Scott A.
Clausen, Anders R.
Clark, Alan B.
MacAlpine, Heather K.
MacAlpine, David M.
Malc, Ewa P.
Mieczkowski, Piotr A.
Burkholder, Adam B.
Fargo, David C.
Gordenin, Dmitry A.
Kunkel, Thomas A.
Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition
title Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition
title_full Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition
title_fullStr Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition
title_short Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition
title_sort heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4216917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25217194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.178335.114
work_keys_str_mv AT lujanscotta heterogeneouspolymerasefidelityandmismatchrepairbiasgenomevariationandcomposition
AT clausenandersr heterogeneouspolymerasefidelityandmismatchrepairbiasgenomevariationandcomposition
AT clarkalanb heterogeneouspolymerasefidelityandmismatchrepairbiasgenomevariationandcomposition
AT macalpineheatherk heterogeneouspolymerasefidelityandmismatchrepairbiasgenomevariationandcomposition
AT macalpinedavidm heterogeneouspolymerasefidelityandmismatchrepairbiasgenomevariationandcomposition
AT malcewap heterogeneouspolymerasefidelityandmismatchrepairbiasgenomevariationandcomposition
AT mieczkowskipiotra heterogeneouspolymerasefidelityandmismatchrepairbiasgenomevariationandcomposition
AT burkholderadamb heterogeneouspolymerasefidelityandmismatchrepairbiasgenomevariationandcomposition
AT fargodavidc heterogeneouspolymerasefidelityandmismatchrepairbiasgenomevariationandcomposition
AT gordenindmitrya heterogeneouspolymerasefidelityandmismatchrepairbiasgenomevariationandcomposition
AT kunkelthomasa heterogeneouspolymerasefidelityandmismatchrepairbiasgenomevariationandcomposition