Cargando…
Flying under the radar: figurative language impairments in focal lesion patients
Despite the prevalent and natural use of metaphor in everyday language, the neural basis of this powerful communication device remains poorly understood. Early studies of brain-injured patients suggested the right hemisphere plays a critical role in metaphor comprehension, but more recent patient an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4217389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25404906 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00871 |
_version_ | 1782342393824018432 |
---|---|
author | Ianni, Geena R. Cardillo, Eileen R. McQuire, Marguerite Chatterjee, Anjan |
author_facet | Ianni, Geena R. Cardillo, Eileen R. McQuire, Marguerite Chatterjee, Anjan |
author_sort | Ianni, Geena R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the prevalent and natural use of metaphor in everyday language, the neural basis of this powerful communication device remains poorly understood. Early studies of brain-injured patients suggested the right hemisphere plays a critical role in metaphor comprehension, but more recent patient and neuroimaging studies do not consistently support this hypothesis. One explanation for this discrepancy is the challenge in designing optimal tasks for brain-injured populations. As traditional aphasia assessments do not assess figurative language comprehension, we designed a new metaphor comprehension task to consider whether impaired metaphor processing is missed by standard clinical assessments. Stimuli consisted of 60 pairs of moderately familiar metaphors and closely matched literal sentences. Sentences were presented visually in a randomized order, followed by four adjective-noun answer choices (target + three foil types). Participants were instructed to select the phrase that best matched the meaning of the sentence. We report the performance of three focal lesion patients and a group of 12 healthy, older controls. Controls performed near ceiling in both conditions, with slightly more accurate performance on literal than metaphoric sentences. While the Western Aphasia Battery (Kertesz, 1982) and the objects and actions naming battery (Druks and Masterson, 2000) indicated minimal to no language difficulty, our metaphor comprehension task indicated three different profiles of metaphor comprehension impairment in the patients’ performance. Single case statistics revealed comparable impairment on metaphoric and literal sentences, disproportionately greater impairment on metaphors than literal sentences, and selective impairment on metaphors. We conclude our task reveals that patients can have selective metaphor comprehension deficits. These deficits are not captured by traditional neuropsychological language assessments, suggesting overlooked communication difficulties. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4217389 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42173892014-11-17 Flying under the radar: figurative language impairments in focal lesion patients Ianni, Geena R. Cardillo, Eileen R. McQuire, Marguerite Chatterjee, Anjan Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Despite the prevalent and natural use of metaphor in everyday language, the neural basis of this powerful communication device remains poorly understood. Early studies of brain-injured patients suggested the right hemisphere plays a critical role in metaphor comprehension, but more recent patient and neuroimaging studies do not consistently support this hypothesis. One explanation for this discrepancy is the challenge in designing optimal tasks for brain-injured populations. As traditional aphasia assessments do not assess figurative language comprehension, we designed a new metaphor comprehension task to consider whether impaired metaphor processing is missed by standard clinical assessments. Stimuli consisted of 60 pairs of moderately familiar metaphors and closely matched literal sentences. Sentences were presented visually in a randomized order, followed by four adjective-noun answer choices (target + three foil types). Participants were instructed to select the phrase that best matched the meaning of the sentence. We report the performance of three focal lesion patients and a group of 12 healthy, older controls. Controls performed near ceiling in both conditions, with slightly more accurate performance on literal than metaphoric sentences. While the Western Aphasia Battery (Kertesz, 1982) and the objects and actions naming battery (Druks and Masterson, 2000) indicated minimal to no language difficulty, our metaphor comprehension task indicated three different profiles of metaphor comprehension impairment in the patients’ performance. Single case statistics revealed comparable impairment on metaphoric and literal sentences, disproportionately greater impairment on metaphors than literal sentences, and selective impairment on metaphors. We conclude our task reveals that patients can have selective metaphor comprehension deficits. These deficits are not captured by traditional neuropsychological language assessments, suggesting overlooked communication difficulties. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4217389/ /pubmed/25404906 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00871 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ianni, Cardillo, McQuire and Chatterjee. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Ianni, Geena R. Cardillo, Eileen R. McQuire, Marguerite Chatterjee, Anjan Flying under the radar: figurative language impairments in focal lesion patients |
title | Flying under the radar: figurative language impairments in focal lesion patients |
title_full | Flying under the radar: figurative language impairments in focal lesion patients |
title_fullStr | Flying under the radar: figurative language impairments in focal lesion patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Flying under the radar: figurative language impairments in focal lesion patients |
title_short | Flying under the radar: figurative language impairments in focal lesion patients |
title_sort | flying under the radar: figurative language impairments in focal lesion patients |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4217389/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25404906 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00871 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iannigeenar flyingundertheradarfigurativelanguageimpairmentsinfocallesionpatients AT cardilloeileenr flyingundertheradarfigurativelanguageimpairmentsinfocallesionpatients AT mcquiremarguerite flyingundertheradarfigurativelanguageimpairmentsinfocallesionpatients AT chatterjeeanjan flyingundertheradarfigurativelanguageimpairmentsinfocallesionpatients |