Cargando…
Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36
We describe and compare four different methods for estimating sample size and power, when the primary outcome of the study is a Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measure. These methods are: 1. assuming a Normal distribution and comparing two means; 2. using a non-parametric method; 3. Whitehead...
Autor principal: | Walters, Stephen J |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC421748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15161494 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-26 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The use of bootstrap methods for analysing health-related quality of life outcomes (particularly the SF-36)
por: Walters, Stephen J, et al.
Publicado: (2004) -
Comparing the reliability and validity of the SF-36 and SF-12 in measuring quality of life among adolescents in China: a large sample cross-sectional study
por: Lin, Yanwei, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Hereditary angioedema: health-related quality of life in Canadian patients as measured by the SF-36
por: Jindal, Nina Lakhani, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Comparison of SF-36 and WHOQoL-BREF in Measuring Quality of Life in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
por: Abbasi-Ghahramanloo, Abbas, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Quality of Life in Mexican Older Adults: Factor Structure of the SF-36 Questionnaire
por: Aguirre, Susana Ivonne, et al.
Publicado: (2022)