Cargando…
Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios
In the United States, policy initiatives aimed at increasing sources of renewable energy are advancing bioenergy production, especially in the Midwest region, where agricultural landscapes dominate. While policy directives are focused on renewable fuel production, biodiversity and ecosystem services...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4217732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25365559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110676 |
_version_ | 1782342435480797184 |
---|---|
author | Bennett, Ashley B. Meehan, Timothy D. Gratton, Claudio Isaacs, Rufus |
author_facet | Bennett, Ashley B. Meehan, Timothy D. Gratton, Claudio Isaacs, Rufus |
author_sort | Bennett, Ashley B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the United States, policy initiatives aimed at increasing sources of renewable energy are advancing bioenergy production, especially in the Midwest region, where agricultural landscapes dominate. While policy directives are focused on renewable fuel production, biodiversity and ecosystem services will be impacted by the land-use changes required to meet production targets. Using data from field observations, we developed empirical models for predicting abundance, diversity, and community composition of flower-visiting bees based on land cover. We used these models to explore how bees might respond under two contrasting bioenergy scenarios: annual bioenergy crop production and perennial grassland bioenergy production. In the two scenarios, 600,000 ha of marginal annual crop land or marginal grassland were converted to perennial grassland or annual row crop bioenergy production, respectively. Model projections indicate that expansion of annual bioenergy crop production at this scale will reduce bee abundance by 0 to 71%, and bee diversity by 0 to 28%, depending on location. In contrast, converting annual crops on marginal soil to perennial grasslands could increase bee abundance from 0 to 600% and increase bee diversity between 0 and 53%. Our analysis of bee community composition suggested a similar pattern, with bee communities becoming less diverse under annual bioenergy crop production, whereas bee composition transitioned towards a more diverse community dominated by wild bees under perennial bioenergy crop production. Models, like those employed here, suggest that bioenergy policies have important consequences for pollinator conservation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4217732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42177322014-11-05 Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios Bennett, Ashley B. Meehan, Timothy D. Gratton, Claudio Isaacs, Rufus PLoS One Research Article In the United States, policy initiatives aimed at increasing sources of renewable energy are advancing bioenergy production, especially in the Midwest region, where agricultural landscapes dominate. While policy directives are focused on renewable fuel production, biodiversity and ecosystem services will be impacted by the land-use changes required to meet production targets. Using data from field observations, we developed empirical models for predicting abundance, diversity, and community composition of flower-visiting bees based on land cover. We used these models to explore how bees might respond under two contrasting bioenergy scenarios: annual bioenergy crop production and perennial grassland bioenergy production. In the two scenarios, 600,000 ha of marginal annual crop land or marginal grassland were converted to perennial grassland or annual row crop bioenergy production, respectively. Model projections indicate that expansion of annual bioenergy crop production at this scale will reduce bee abundance by 0 to 71%, and bee diversity by 0 to 28%, depending on location. In contrast, converting annual crops on marginal soil to perennial grasslands could increase bee abundance from 0 to 600% and increase bee diversity between 0 and 53%. Our analysis of bee community composition suggested a similar pattern, with bee communities becoming less diverse under annual bioenergy crop production, whereas bee composition transitioned towards a more diverse community dominated by wild bees under perennial bioenergy crop production. Models, like those employed here, suggest that bioenergy policies have important consequences for pollinator conservation. Public Library of Science 2014-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4217732/ /pubmed/25365559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110676 Text en © 2014 Bennett et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bennett, Ashley B. Meehan, Timothy D. Gratton, Claudio Isaacs, Rufus Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios |
title | Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios |
title_full | Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios |
title_fullStr | Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios |
title_short | Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios |
title_sort | modeling pollinator community response to contrasting bioenergy scenarios |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4217732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25365559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110676 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bennettashleyb modelingpollinatorcommunityresponsetocontrastingbioenergyscenarios AT meehantimothyd modelingpollinatorcommunityresponsetocontrastingbioenergyscenarios AT grattonclaudio modelingpollinatorcommunityresponsetocontrastingbioenergyscenarios AT isaacsrufus modelingpollinatorcommunityresponsetocontrastingbioenergyscenarios |