Cargando…

Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios

In the United States, policy initiatives aimed at increasing sources of renewable energy are advancing bioenergy production, especially in the Midwest region, where agricultural landscapes dominate. While policy directives are focused on renewable fuel production, biodiversity and ecosystem services...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bennett, Ashley B., Meehan, Timothy D., Gratton, Claudio, Isaacs, Rufus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4217732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25365559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110676
_version_ 1782342435480797184
author Bennett, Ashley B.
Meehan, Timothy D.
Gratton, Claudio
Isaacs, Rufus
author_facet Bennett, Ashley B.
Meehan, Timothy D.
Gratton, Claudio
Isaacs, Rufus
author_sort Bennett, Ashley B.
collection PubMed
description In the United States, policy initiatives aimed at increasing sources of renewable energy are advancing bioenergy production, especially in the Midwest region, where agricultural landscapes dominate. While policy directives are focused on renewable fuel production, biodiversity and ecosystem services will be impacted by the land-use changes required to meet production targets. Using data from field observations, we developed empirical models for predicting abundance, diversity, and community composition of flower-visiting bees based on land cover. We used these models to explore how bees might respond under two contrasting bioenergy scenarios: annual bioenergy crop production and perennial grassland bioenergy production. In the two scenarios, 600,000 ha of marginal annual crop land or marginal grassland were converted to perennial grassland or annual row crop bioenergy production, respectively. Model projections indicate that expansion of annual bioenergy crop production at this scale will reduce bee abundance by 0 to 71%, and bee diversity by 0 to 28%, depending on location. In contrast, converting annual crops on marginal soil to perennial grasslands could increase bee abundance from 0 to 600% and increase bee diversity between 0 and 53%. Our analysis of bee community composition suggested a similar pattern, with bee communities becoming less diverse under annual bioenergy crop production, whereas bee composition transitioned towards a more diverse community dominated by wild bees under perennial bioenergy crop production. Models, like those employed here, suggest that bioenergy policies have important consequences for pollinator conservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4217732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42177322014-11-05 Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios Bennett, Ashley B. Meehan, Timothy D. Gratton, Claudio Isaacs, Rufus PLoS One Research Article In the United States, policy initiatives aimed at increasing sources of renewable energy are advancing bioenergy production, especially in the Midwest region, where agricultural landscapes dominate. While policy directives are focused on renewable fuel production, biodiversity and ecosystem services will be impacted by the land-use changes required to meet production targets. Using data from field observations, we developed empirical models for predicting abundance, diversity, and community composition of flower-visiting bees based on land cover. We used these models to explore how bees might respond under two contrasting bioenergy scenarios: annual bioenergy crop production and perennial grassland bioenergy production. In the two scenarios, 600,000 ha of marginal annual crop land or marginal grassland were converted to perennial grassland or annual row crop bioenergy production, respectively. Model projections indicate that expansion of annual bioenergy crop production at this scale will reduce bee abundance by 0 to 71%, and bee diversity by 0 to 28%, depending on location. In contrast, converting annual crops on marginal soil to perennial grasslands could increase bee abundance from 0 to 600% and increase bee diversity between 0 and 53%. Our analysis of bee community composition suggested a similar pattern, with bee communities becoming less diverse under annual bioenergy crop production, whereas bee composition transitioned towards a more diverse community dominated by wild bees under perennial bioenergy crop production. Models, like those employed here, suggest that bioenergy policies have important consequences for pollinator conservation. Public Library of Science 2014-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4217732/ /pubmed/25365559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110676 Text en © 2014 Bennett et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bennett, Ashley B.
Meehan, Timothy D.
Gratton, Claudio
Isaacs, Rufus
Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios
title Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios
title_full Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios
title_fullStr Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios
title_short Modeling Pollinator Community Response to Contrasting Bioenergy Scenarios
title_sort modeling pollinator community response to contrasting bioenergy scenarios
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4217732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25365559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110676
work_keys_str_mv AT bennettashleyb modelingpollinatorcommunityresponsetocontrastingbioenergyscenarios
AT meehantimothyd modelingpollinatorcommunityresponsetocontrastingbioenergyscenarios
AT grattonclaudio modelingpollinatorcommunityresponsetocontrastingbioenergyscenarios
AT isaacsrufus modelingpollinatorcommunityresponsetocontrastingbioenergyscenarios