Cargando…

A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging and Mammography on Patients with BI-RADS 3–5 Microcalcifications

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate the diagnostic value of breast MRI in patients with BI-RADS 3–5 microcalcifications in mammography. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with BI-RADS 3–5 microcalcifications on mammography underwent breast MR exams before surgical biopsy with a hookwire position un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Erni, Li, Jing, Song, Ying, Xue, Mei, Zhou, Chunwu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4218847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25365327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111217
_version_ 1782342486278012928
author Li, Erni
Li, Jing
Song, Ying
Xue, Mei
Zhou, Chunwu
author_facet Li, Erni
Li, Jing
Song, Ying
Xue, Mei
Zhou, Chunwu
author_sort Li, Erni
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate the diagnostic value of breast MRI in patients with BI-RADS 3–5 microcalcifications in mammography. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with BI-RADS 3–5 microcalcifications on mammography underwent breast MR exams before surgical biopsy with a hookwire position under mammographic guidance. Two radiologists reviewed each lesion with BI-RADS by consensus. The diagnostic value of mammography and MRI was compared. RESULTS: Histopathological examination revealed 49 benign lesions and 42 malignant lesions. In the assessments of mammography, 21 lesions (23.1%) were assigned to category 3, 51 lesions (56.0%) to category 4, and 19 lesions (20.9%) to category 5. The area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve for mammography and MR assessment was 0.844, and 0.945, respectively (p<0.05). In cases of category 3 microcalcifications, the specificity of mammography and MR was 100%, and 95.2% (p = 1.000), respectively. In cases of category 4 microcalcifications, the specificity, PPV and accuracy of mammography was 0%, 45.1% and 45.1%; whereas those for MR was 82.1% (p<0.05), 80.8% (P = 0.003) and 86.3% (p<0.05). All microcalcifications of category 5 were correctly diagnosed by mammography and MR. CONCLUSIONS: Breast MRI has the potential to significantly improve the diagnosis of category 4 microcalcifications on mammography. Among mammographic category 4 microcalcifications, about 82% of benign lesions can be degraded to BI-RADS 1∼3 by MRI. However for microcalcifications of category 3 and 5, MR exams do not show significant improvement over mammography.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4218847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42188472014-11-05 A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging and Mammography on Patients with BI-RADS 3–5 Microcalcifications Li, Erni Li, Jing Song, Ying Xue, Mei Zhou, Chunwu PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively investigate the diagnostic value of breast MRI in patients with BI-RADS 3–5 microcalcifications in mammography. METHODS: Eighty-four patients with BI-RADS 3–5 microcalcifications on mammography underwent breast MR exams before surgical biopsy with a hookwire position under mammographic guidance. Two radiologists reviewed each lesion with BI-RADS by consensus. The diagnostic value of mammography and MRI was compared. RESULTS: Histopathological examination revealed 49 benign lesions and 42 malignant lesions. In the assessments of mammography, 21 lesions (23.1%) were assigned to category 3, 51 lesions (56.0%) to category 4, and 19 lesions (20.9%) to category 5. The area under the receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve for mammography and MR assessment was 0.844, and 0.945, respectively (p<0.05). In cases of category 3 microcalcifications, the specificity of mammography and MR was 100%, and 95.2% (p = 1.000), respectively. In cases of category 4 microcalcifications, the specificity, PPV and accuracy of mammography was 0%, 45.1% and 45.1%; whereas those for MR was 82.1% (p<0.05), 80.8% (P = 0.003) and 86.3% (p<0.05). All microcalcifications of category 5 were correctly diagnosed by mammography and MR. CONCLUSIONS: Breast MRI has the potential to significantly improve the diagnosis of category 4 microcalcifications on mammography. Among mammographic category 4 microcalcifications, about 82% of benign lesions can be degraded to BI-RADS 1∼3 by MRI. However for microcalcifications of category 3 and 5, MR exams do not show significant improvement over mammography. Public Library of Science 2014-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4218847/ /pubmed/25365327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111217 Text en © 2014 Li et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Erni
Li, Jing
Song, Ying
Xue, Mei
Zhou, Chunwu
A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging and Mammography on Patients with BI-RADS 3–5 Microcalcifications
title A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging and Mammography on Patients with BI-RADS 3–5 Microcalcifications
title_full A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging and Mammography on Patients with BI-RADS 3–5 Microcalcifications
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging and Mammography on Patients with BI-RADS 3–5 Microcalcifications
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging and Mammography on Patients with BI-RADS 3–5 Microcalcifications
title_short A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging and Mammography on Patients with BI-RADS 3–5 Microcalcifications
title_sort comparative study of the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced breast mr imaging and mammography on patients with bi-rads 3–5 microcalcifications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4218847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25365327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111217
work_keys_str_mv AT lierni acomparativestudyofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedbreastmrimagingandmammographyonpatientswithbirads35microcalcifications
AT lijing acomparativestudyofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedbreastmrimagingandmammographyonpatientswithbirads35microcalcifications
AT songying acomparativestudyofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedbreastmrimagingandmammographyonpatientswithbirads35microcalcifications
AT xuemei acomparativestudyofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedbreastmrimagingandmammographyonpatientswithbirads35microcalcifications
AT zhouchunwu acomparativestudyofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedbreastmrimagingandmammographyonpatientswithbirads35microcalcifications
AT lierni comparativestudyofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedbreastmrimagingandmammographyonpatientswithbirads35microcalcifications
AT lijing comparativestudyofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedbreastmrimagingandmammographyonpatientswithbirads35microcalcifications
AT songying comparativestudyofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedbreastmrimagingandmammographyonpatientswithbirads35microcalcifications
AT xuemei comparativestudyofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedbreastmrimagingandmammographyonpatientswithbirads35microcalcifications
AT zhouchunwu comparativestudyofthediagnosticvalueofcontrastenhancedbreastmrimagingandmammographyonpatientswithbirads35microcalcifications